Comments on: 100%: Salad Days

By: Travis R. Chance

Travis R. Chance — Tue, 23 Mar 2010 22:55:09 +0000

Good points. I tend to build around what I perceive as “optimal overall synergy,” but admittedly things slip by unnoticed here and there.

By: Zeitgeist

Zeitgeist — Mon, 22 Mar 2010 00:34:16 +0000

On the topic of Survival, it’s hardly ever card disadvantage; the example you gave ends up the same way if you just play out the lackluster guy and it gets killed off, except you’ve set yourself back a grand total of G. (And I guess a card because of having Survival in play, but if the argument is that the Survival effect isn’t worth the card you lose to have it available, I definitely can’t agree there.)

If nothing else, I feel like it should probably be in the board for the same matchups where you board in Genesis or other long-game cards. (It’s also another way to search up your Magus of the Moon where Pact and Natural Order won’t.)

By: Travis R. Chance

Travis R. Chance — Sat, 13 Mar 2010 06:21:05 +0000

Hmm. I dunno about the Rean comment? You yourself were quite the open dejector of the LD portion of the deck as well as the land cyclers initially. I only point this out as a point of pride and extensive testing; I don’t feel that in any way the builds I have shared are “conventional,” though, of course, they have the typical trappings with regard to dump and slizz to bring homies back to life.

But yeah, FTK came in like two days after this vid was made, as the deck has zilcho removal. Seriously, this thing can house decks with greedy mana bases and outclasses a lot of dude-based decks by virtue of sheer burliness. Def give it a try; I have won a few 2-mans.

By: platipus10

platipus10 — Sat, 13 Mar 2010 05:18:06 +0000

I might have seen you play the FTK I can’t remember, I just noticed that it wasn’t in the list above, so I figured that it might have been my FTK that was in play at one point.

What i am fully waiting for now are all the people that will copy this deck to play in the Qs. I already frequently will see people with your UW and have played against what appeared to be your reanimator a few times, but that is more difficult to tell since many reanimator bases would be similar.

By: Travis R. Chance

Travis R. Chance — Sat, 13 Mar 2010 03:00:57 +0000

F games! And I added FTK, but you know that bc I played against you last night (nice try, plat), and Harmonize is not good in a deck with an actual curve that isn’t farting elves or one drops out. I hate that card, forevs! If it ain’t got legs, I don’t want it! Also, this is a fun deck. Relax, animaniacs!

By: Robin Russell (RoninX)

Robin Russell (RoninX) — Fri, 12 Mar 2010 23:45:20 +0000

C’mon man give us a game or two along with the awesome (and exhaustive) deck techs.

PS – happy birthday!

By: Hovertical

Hovertical — Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:21:23 +0000

I don’t agree with your lack of Harmonize when you really don’t have any card draw…Not to mention the card is SIICK. But its a nice deck brah