<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Anything But: A &#8216;Month&#8217; in Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/anything-but-a-month-in-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/anything-but-a-month-in-review/</link>
	<description>The prime source for Magic the Gathering strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2017 22:21:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ernesto Laprise</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/anything-but-a-month-in-review/comment-page-1/#comment-62339</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ernesto Laprise]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2013 07:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=22272#comment-62339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Believe it or not  unlike the Brits in The most beneficial Exotic Marigold Hotel, who want to leave England  I might enjoy to retire to England. I really like that country!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Believe it or not  unlike the Brits in The most beneficial Exotic Marigold Hotel, who want to leave England  I might enjoy to retire to England. I really like that country!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OwlRaider</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/anything-but-a-month-in-review/comment-page-1/#comment-57443</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[OwlRaider]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2013 11:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=22272#comment-57443</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now that we&#039;re a bit into the post BnR meta we can clearly see that Temporal Fissures has become the go-to option for all combo decks, taking the place of both Empty the Warrens+Grapeshot storm decks as well as Infect which was a pseudo combo deck. There are a lot of different versions of this deck, like Mono Blue Stormpost, Familiar Storm, Simic Stormpost, etc. We also see a rise in all the other non Fissure 8 post strategies like Izzet Post, Dimir Post and even Green Post, and these decks have some variety too within them. The 2 go-to decks for aggro players are still Stompy and Affinity. MUC, Delver Blue, White Weenie, Goblins, etc aren&#039;t dead but aren&#039;t seeing as much play as they used to, but are still very much contenders. The 2 newest decks to become major contenders are Elves and Delver Fiend(I suspect that&#039;s what you meant when you used the term WeeFiend). Elves has become a surprisingly strong aggro deck that can also play the long game thanks to various creature tricks and numbers and the potential massive life gain from the likes of Wellwisher. Delver Fiend is the only combo deck that&#039;s left that still aims to kill the opponent fast rather than just bounce all his permanents back and slowly beat him down with Mulldrifters or whatever.

Overall, while Temporal Fissures and the 8 post engine are still somewhat oppressive, all the other decks that weren&#039;t directly affected by the BnR are still alive, as are many rogue decks. So on the 1 hand we have 2 archetypes that dominate the field, on the other hand we have tremendous variety outside of these 2 archetypes. Also both archetypes consist of a variety of decks themselves, though all of the different varieties within each archetype work in the same way pretty much. So looking into the health of the format, there are 2 ways to look at it. The first is that there&#039;s a very high chance of facing either the 8 post engine or Temporal Fissures, oftentimes both in the same deck. The second is that you can still be very competitive without playing either Temporal Fissures or 8 post, or even pick 1 of these powerhouses and make your own version using said powerhouse. Whether this is considered healthy or not is up to each individual&#039;s point of view.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that we&#8217;re a bit into the post BnR meta we can clearly see that Temporal Fissures has become the go-to option for all combo decks, taking the place of both Empty the Warrens+Grapeshot storm decks as well as Infect which was a pseudo combo deck. There are a lot of different versions of this deck, like Mono Blue Stormpost, Familiar Storm, Simic Stormpost, etc. We also see a rise in all the other non Fissure 8 post strategies like Izzet Post, Dimir Post and even Green Post, and these decks have some variety too within them. The 2 go-to decks for aggro players are still Stompy and Affinity. MUC, Delver Blue, White Weenie, Goblins, etc aren&#8217;t dead but aren&#8217;t seeing as much play as they used to, but are still very much contenders. The 2 newest decks to become major contenders are Elves and Delver Fiend(I suspect that&#8217;s what you meant when you used the term WeeFiend). Elves has become a surprisingly strong aggro deck that can also play the long game thanks to various creature tricks and numbers and the potential massive life gain from the likes of Wellwisher. Delver Fiend is the only combo deck that&#8217;s left that still aims to kill the opponent fast rather than just bounce all his permanents back and slowly beat him down with Mulldrifters or whatever.</p>
<p>Overall, while Temporal Fissures and the 8 post engine are still somewhat oppressive, all the other decks that weren&#8217;t directly affected by the BnR are still alive, as are many rogue decks. So on the 1 hand we have 2 archetypes that dominate the field, on the other hand we have tremendous variety outside of these 2 archetypes. Also both archetypes consist of a variety of decks themselves, though all of the different varieties within each archetype work in the same way pretty much. So looking into the health of the format, there are 2 ways to look at it. The first is that there&#8217;s a very high chance of facing either the 8 post engine or Temporal Fissures, oftentimes both in the same deck. The second is that you can still be very competitive without playing either Temporal Fissures or 8 post, or even pick 1 of these powerhouses and make your own version using said powerhouse. Whether this is considered healthy or not is up to each individual&#8217;s point of view.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cosik</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/anything-but-a-month-in-review/comment-page-1/#comment-23176</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cosik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 16:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=22272#comment-23176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have to agree with the current state of the format.  I was a white weenie player in dailys before the bannings enjoying my storm and infect matchups and now with delver and post being such a large part of the format I really haven&#039;t found something I enjoy running in dailys.  I always have been a bit of a deck builder but haven&#039;t really struck on a idea that functions to well thus far.

Anyway though great article as always and I to hope that someone busts up the format any day now with something new and exciting.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with the current state of the format.  I was a white weenie player in dailys before the bannings enjoying my storm and infect matchups and now with delver and post being such a large part of the format I really haven&#8217;t found something I enjoy running in dailys.  I always have been a bit of a deck builder but haven&#8217;t really struck on a idea that functions to well thus far.</p>
<p>Anyway though great article as always and I to hope that someone busts up the format any day now with something new and exciting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JustSin</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/anything-but-a-month-in-review/comment-page-1/#comment-22110</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JustSin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2013 22:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=22272#comment-22110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.wizards.com/Magic/Digital/MagicOnlineTourn.aspx?x=mtg/digital/magiconline/tourn/4910580

no direct link, scroll down a bit it was by goldenloveninja 3-1]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.wizards.com/Magic/Digital/MagicOnlineTourn.aspx?x=mtg/digital/magiconline/tourn/4910580" rel="nofollow">http://www.wizards.com/Magic/Digital/MagicOnlineTourn.aspx?x=mtg/digital/magiconline/tourn/4910580</a></p>
<p>no direct link, scroll down a bit it was by goldenloveninja 3-1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe_</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/anything-but-a-month-in-review/comment-page-1/#comment-22098</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe_]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2013 20:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=22272#comment-22098</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d like to take a look at the Azorius Trinket build.  Can you post the link to the daily the deck placed in?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to take a look at the Azorius Trinket build.  Can you post the link to the daily the deck placed in?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JustSin</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/anything-but-a-month-in-review/comment-page-1/#comment-21836</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JustSin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 20:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=22272#comment-21836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[it has been proposed before, but you need the man power and trust that everyone who volunteers would stick with it]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it has been proposed before, but you need the man power and trust that everyone who volunteers would stick with it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MiFraDeLa88</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/anything-but-a-month-in-review/comment-page-1/#comment-21810</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MiFraDeLa88]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 17:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=22272#comment-21810</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was thinking, and wouldn&#039;t it be cool to start some sort of collaborative data-mining project with as many people as possible involved?  It must be a lot of work watching all the replays from a daily event, but if a group of people did it we could actually get a much more statistically significant sample of the metagame.  It would be very cool to see a matchup table with real data like the one you presented, but with many more data points.  Also, being able to track how the matchup table changes with something like the introduction of a new card to the format (like electrickery) would be pretty sweet.  

If enough people were involved, it may actually be possible to start breaking each person&#039;s work into rounds rather than full events.  Let me know if you would be interested in something like that and I&#039;m on board.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was thinking, and wouldn&#8217;t it be cool to start some sort of collaborative data-mining project with as many people as possible involved?  It must be a lot of work watching all the replays from a daily event, but if a group of people did it we could actually get a much more statistically significant sample of the metagame.  It would be very cool to see a matchup table with real data like the one you presented, but with many more data points.  Also, being able to track how the matchup table changes with something like the introduction of a new card to the format (like electrickery) would be pretty sweet.  </p>
<p>If enough people were involved, it may actually be possible to start breaking each person&#8217;s work into rounds rather than full events.  Let me know if you would be interested in something like that and I&#8217;m on board.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
