<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Anything But: Eye Exam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/anything-but-eye-exam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/anything-but-eye-exam/</link>
	<description>The prime source for Magic the Gathering strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2017 22:21:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gustavo Barroso</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/anything-but-eye-exam/comment-page-1/#comment-58172</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gustavo Barroso]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2013 19:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=24166#comment-58172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excellent! I like the deck, it is fun, but I couldn&#039;t agree more with your text]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent! I like the deck, it is fun, but I couldn&#8217;t agree more with your text</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SKarface</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/anything-but-eye-exam/comment-page-1/#comment-57086</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SKarface]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 17:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=24166#comment-57086</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ok, sorry for spam. I found older list http://www.mtgo-stats.com/decks/43809]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, sorry for spam. I found older list <a href="http://www.mtgo-stats.com/decks/43809" rel="nofollow">http://www.mtgo-stats.com/decks/43809</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SKarface</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/anything-but-eye-exam/comment-page-1/#comment-57085</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SKarface]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 17:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=24166#comment-57085</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would like to give credits to inventor of deck which dominates meta these days: MonoBlue TemporalFissure post. Inventor: Milan Nižňanský alias &quot;reboorn&quot; on modo; &quot;kukuricak&quot; - streaming nick on twitch. He made Top 16 on GP Bochum, several other national success. 
I&#039;m not sure if this is a proof http://www.mtgo-stats.com/decks/46805 - this is his decklist from january 29th. Unfortunately I wasn&#039;t able to find older decklist but the deck was constructed before bans.
I&#039;m just...It&#039;s pity that many people play many different decks and don&#039;t have a clue and are not interested in fact who has invented their deck. This way I would also like to give my best regards to invetor of DelverBlue and Izzet&quot;banned&quot;Storm. :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to give credits to inventor of deck which dominates meta these days: MonoBlue TemporalFissure post. Inventor: Milan Nižňanský alias &#8220;reboorn&#8221; on modo; &#8220;kukuricak&#8221; &#8211; streaming nick on twitch. He made Top 16 on GP Bochum, several other national success.<br />
I&#8217;m not sure if this is a proof <a href="http://www.mtgo-stats.com/decks/46805" rel="nofollow">http://www.mtgo-stats.com/decks/46805</a> &#8211; this is his decklist from january 29th. Unfortunately I wasn&#8217;t able to find older decklist but the deck was constructed before bans.<br />
I&#8217;m just&#8230;It&#8217;s pity that many people play many different decks and don&#8217;t have a clue and are not interested in fact who has invented their deck. This way I would also like to give my best regards to invetor of DelverBlue and Izzet&#8221;banned&#8221;Storm. <img src="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" class="wp-smiley" /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BrunoBrocken</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/anything-but-eye-exam/comment-page-1/#comment-57041</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BrunoBrocken]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 14:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=24166#comment-57041</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@smolensk and @JustSin 

I&#039;m running Artful Dodge (with great succes) because i feel the flashbacks benefits the deck more.
Shadow rift is great to draw a card, but I feel is looses some of it&#039;s benefits in the mirror.
I haven&#039;t played with distortion strike yet but I feel it is inferior to both Shadow Rift and Artful Dodge, because the rebound condition can be taken away.  SR draws you a card and AD can still be flashbacked.

Just my two cents]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@smolensk and @JustSin </p>
<p>I&#8217;m running Artful Dodge (with great succes) because i feel the flashbacks benefits the deck more.<br />
Shadow rift is great to draw a card, but I feel is looses some of it&#8217;s benefits in the mirror.<br />
I haven&#8217;t played with distortion strike yet but I feel it is inferior to both Shadow Rift and Artful Dodge, because the rebound condition can be taken away.  SR draws you a card and AD can still be flashbacked.</p>
<p>Just my two cents</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JustSin</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/anything-but-eye-exam/comment-page-1/#comment-57002</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JustSin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2013 19:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=24166#comment-57002</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[perhaps bearer wasn&#039;t the best example, but I even stated why it wasn&#039;t a great answer vs. Eye Candy, was just trying to make a point about how there are plenty of options to hose the deck :P]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>perhaps bearer wasn&#8217;t the best example, but I even stated why it wasn&#8217;t a great answer vs. Eye Candy, was just trying to make a point about how there are plenty of options to hose the deck <img src="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif" alt=":P" class="wp-smiley" /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deluxeicoff</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/anything-but-eye-exam/comment-page-1/#comment-56946</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[deluxeicoff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 14:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=24166#comment-56946</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ST.Bearer vs. this is bad imo - as for both your points, as well as ap.blessing still works on fiend/clops.

I&#039;ve won quite a bit with it but my version has no burn, heavy blue base/evasion and crimson wisps from my old d.red days - really adds a surprise value to midgame, and in a pinch, you just turn an opps critter red at the end of turn :)

Deck tinkerers - Don&#039;t overlook lavadart/gush either

Great article as always - and thanks for the props :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ST.Bearer vs. this is bad imo &#8211; as for both your points, as well as ap.blessing still works on fiend/clops.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve won quite a bit with it but my version has no burn, heavy blue base/evasion and crimson wisps from my old d.red days &#8211; really adds a surprise value to midgame, and in a pinch, you just turn an opps critter red at the end of turn <img src="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" class="wp-smiley" /> </p>
<p>Deck tinkerers &#8211; Don&#8217;t overlook lavadart/gush either</p>
<p>Great article as always &#8211; and thanks for the props <img src="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" class="wp-smiley" /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JustSin</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/anything-but-eye-exam/comment-page-1/#comment-56942</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JustSin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 12:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=24166#comment-56942</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In order shadow rift is first because it allows the draw, which increases the odds of you finding yet another spell you can cast to increase the size of the fiend/clops, second and third are probably a bit more debatable, but I&#039;d think artful dodge gets second because you get to choose when you use it a second time whereas with distortion strike it will be replayed last turn even if you no longer have a creature to use it on]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In order shadow rift is first because it allows the draw, which increases the odds of you finding yet another spell you can cast to increase the size of the fiend/clops, second and third are probably a bit more debatable, but I&#8217;d think artful dodge gets second because you get to choose when you use it a second time whereas with distortion strike it will be replayed last turn even if you no longer have a creature to use it on</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
