<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Anything But: The First Five</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/anything-but-the-first-five/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/anything-but-the-first-five/</link>
	<description>The prime source for Magic the Gathering strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2017 22:21:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/anything-but-the-first-five/comment-page-1/#comment-11176</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 21:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=19034#comment-11176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very sad to see the competitive corner snuffed by some pointless policy wizards decided to adopt.  Anyway, have you considered lengthening the amount of time between competitive metagame analysis?  Even if you pooled data for 2 months at a time and just gave us an update on how a new set had effected the meta with a number crunch to back it up I think it would be better than nothing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very sad to see the competitive corner snuffed by some pointless policy wizards decided to adopt.  Anyway, have you considered lengthening the amount of time between competitive metagame analysis?  Even if you pooled data for 2 months at a time and just gave us an update on how a new set had effected the meta with a number crunch to back it up I think it would be better than nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JustSin</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/anything-but-the-first-five/comment-page-1/#comment-11107</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JustSin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2012 03:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=19034#comment-11107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[thanks for the input... I really do like arrester and hope something good can come from it]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for the input&#8230; I really do like arrester and hope something good can come from it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deluxeicoff</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/anything-but-the-first-five/comment-page-1/#comment-11098</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[deluxeicoff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2012 20:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=19034#comment-11098</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Suggestion:  REALITY ACID should be in the azorius deck - crazy good in that style.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Suggestion:  REALITY ACID should be in the azorius deck &#8211; crazy good in that style.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deluxeicoff</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/anything-but-the-first-five/comment-page-1/#comment-11097</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[deluxeicoff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2012 20:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=19034#comment-11097</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At first glance, &quot;Detain&quot; seemed weak, but for any fans of tempo - it&#039;s a real threat.  Hopefully the next few sets will further this mechanic.  It plays like an oblivion ring that targets something new each time and for only a turn - powerful stuff.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At first glance, &#8220;Detain&#8221; seemed weak, but for any fans of tempo &#8211; it&#8217;s a real threat.  Hopefully the next few sets will further this mechanic.  It plays like an oblivion ring that targets something new each time and for only a turn &#8211; powerful stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JustSin</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/anything-but-the-first-five/comment-page-1/#comment-11084</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JustSin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2012 16:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=19034#comment-11084</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[thanks for the comments

@Pixywing: I tried my best to add the disclaimer that these were mostly casual, which is something I do like to write about as often as competitive Pauper... what you miss in this article is the behind the scenes part where I worked on this for three weeks.  Not only did I have to create five decks that I liked, but I also had to put together commentary and gameplay videos and that took an INCREDIBLE amount of time.  Most of these decks were completely trashed and rebuilt at least once. What goes into coming up with a solid rogue deck meant for competitive play is a lot of testing and tweaking and if I did that for each of these decks it would have taken forever... in order to save some time I left out sideboards and working for competitive (because I think some of them don&#039;t hold ground as competitive) and tried to give a little bit of a discussion on what you might be able to do if you wanted to try yourself to make them more competitive]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for the comments</p>
<p>@Pixywing: I tried my best to add the disclaimer that these were mostly casual, which is something I do like to write about as often as competitive Pauper&#8230; what you miss in this article is the behind the scenes part where I worked on this for three weeks.  Not only did I have to create five decks that I liked, but I also had to put together commentary and gameplay videos and that took an INCREDIBLE amount of time.  Most of these decks were completely trashed and rebuilt at least once. What goes into coming up with a solid rogue deck meant for competitive play is a lot of testing and tweaking and if I did that for each of these decks it would have taken forever&#8230; in order to save some time I left out sideboards and working for competitive (because I think some of them don&#8217;t hold ground as competitive) and tried to give a little bit of a discussion on what you might be able to do if you wanted to try yourself to make them more competitive</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pixywing</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/anything-but-the-first-five/comment-page-1/#comment-11080</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pixywing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2012 16:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=19034#comment-11080</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Really wish you took these to dailies rather than play bad people in the just for run room or at least do a 2 man.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really wish you took these to dailies rather than play bad people in the just for run room or at least do a 2 man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ownage77</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/anything-but-the-first-five/comment-page-1/#comment-11069</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ownage77]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2012 11:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=19034#comment-11069</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice decks an video. Thank you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice decks an video. Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
