<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Beggars CAN be Choosers: A Metagame-Focused View of a Deck</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/beggars-can-be-choosers-a-metagame-focused-view-of-a-deck-of-the-month/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/beggars-can-be-choosers-a-metagame-focused-view-of-a-deck-of-the-month/</link>
	<description>The prime source for Magic the Gathering strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2017 22:21:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: gamemaster32</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/beggars-can-be-choosers-a-metagame-focused-view-of-a-deck-of-the-month/comment-page-1/#comment-4523</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gamemaster32]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2011 15:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=11856#comment-4523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excellent debut. Keep it up!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent debut. Keep it up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: middleman_35</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/beggars-can-be-choosers-a-metagame-focused-view-of-a-deck-of-the-month/comment-page-1/#comment-4481</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[middleman_35]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 21:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=11856#comment-4481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Firstly, I really like the idea of this series.  Internet Pauper writing has been a little stagnant of late, nice to see a new, regular feature with a fresh perspective.

General tips:
-If notes + time are giving you problems, have you tried playing and then note-taking from your replays?
-The 2-man Queues are terrible EV at the moment as the price of M11 packs is so low.  If you can manage the time committment Daily Events are much better (bonus: QPs!)
- Drop by the pdcmagic Classic forums at http://forums.pdcmagic.com/viewforum.php?f=6.  We&#039;re a friendly bunch (mostly) and there&#039;s some good metagame information and general deck information.

Deck tips:
-This is quite a hard deck to pick up for your first foray into the format, though it is IMO one of the top two decks atm, the other being Affinity.  It requires quite a lot of practice, which as you noticed can be quite hard to get as a lot of people in Tournament Practice dislike playing against the deck.
-The deck is combo, but plays quite differently against different opponents.  Sometimes you&#039;re going to want to go for it on turn 3-4, other times you&#039;re going to want to attrition them with draw spells every turn, other times you&#039;re going to want to save up for one big turn, etc.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firstly, I really like the idea of this series.  Internet Pauper writing has been a little stagnant of late, nice to see a new, regular feature with a fresh perspective.</p>
<p>General tips:<br />
-If notes + time are giving you problems, have you tried playing and then note-taking from your replays?<br />
-The 2-man Queues are terrible EV at the moment as the price of M11 packs is so low.  If you can manage the time committment Daily Events are much better (bonus: QPs!)<br />
- Drop by the pdcmagic Classic forums at <a href="http://forums.pdcmagic.com/viewforum.php?f=6" rel="nofollow">http://forums.pdcmagic.com/viewforum.php?f=6</a>.  We&#8217;re a friendly bunch (mostly) and there&#8217;s some good metagame information and general deck information.</p>
<p>Deck tips:<br />
-This is quite a hard deck to pick up for your first foray into the format, though it is IMO one of the top two decks atm, the other being Affinity.  It requires quite a lot of practice, which as you noticed can be quite hard to get as a lot of people in Tournament Practice dislike playing against the deck.<br />
-The deck is combo, but plays quite differently against different opponents.  Sometimes you&#8217;re going to want to go for it on turn 3-4, other times you&#8217;re going to want to attrition them with draw spells every turn, other times you&#8217;re going to want to save up for one big turn, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toxic fungus</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/beggars-can-be-choosers-a-metagame-focused-view-of-a-deck-of-the-month/comment-page-1/#comment-4477</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[toxic fungus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 13:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=11856#comment-4477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[weefunkster: I am not equipped, nor do I have the time, to make videos for this series. Thanks for your interest though!

Mark: Thanks for the info on the GW matchup. I agree that this whole experiment will have difficulty with &quot;learning&quot; the deck and the matchups very well. But that is part of the experience, right? I appreciate the offer of playtesting, and I may take you up on that (and I&#039;ll check out PDC further). I kind of want to go in a little cold though, since that is what I am trying to represent.... I think. What do you guys think? Should I discuss and research the matchups more? Or go in cold and see what happens?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>weefunkster: I am not equipped, nor do I have the time, to make videos for this series. Thanks for your interest though!</p>
<p>Mark: Thanks for the info on the GW matchup. I agree that this whole experiment will have difficulty with &#8220;learning&#8221; the deck and the matchups very well. But that is part of the experience, right? I appreciate the offer of playtesting, and I may take you up on that (and I&#8217;ll check out PDC further). I kind of want to go in a little cold though, since that is what I am trying to represent&#8230;. I think. What do you guys think? Should I discuss and research the matchups more? Or go in cold and see what happens?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/beggars-can-be-choosers-a-metagame-focused-view-of-a-deck-of-the-month/comment-page-1/#comment-4474</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 11:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=11856#comment-4474</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great series concept, I think this makes a lot of sense for those new to pauper. 

After you have some experience with the match-up, GW cloak is a lot closer than you make it seem, since the only relevant creature is the Ledgewalker, and if you&#039;re comboing you have plenty of 1/1 fliers to block it, even if it has rancor (as they can&#039;t really attack into a cloud), since you can just bounce the cloaks. This of course requires that you keep an appropriate hand, but that&#039;s part of the learning process of playing a combo deck. The biggest flaw of the deck is that the combo, while very powerful, doesn&#039;t actually win the game on the spot and, depending on what they have, they might still be in it if you too many storm enablers. Also, it&#039;s very complicated to play well against the field and requires a good understanding of the metagame to know which hands are keepable, which doesn&#039;t make it newbie friendly.  

If you&#039;re interested in getting playtest partners who won&#039;t accused you of cheating/play awkward decks, feel free to contact myself (Brussky on MTGO) or any of the regulars on the PDC forums, I&#039;m sure a lot of people would jump at the chance to play pauper.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great series concept, I think this makes a lot of sense for those new to pauper. </p>
<p>After you have some experience with the match-up, GW cloak is a lot closer than you make it seem, since the only relevant creature is the Ledgewalker, and if you&#8217;re comboing you have plenty of 1/1 fliers to block it, even if it has rancor (as they can&#8217;t really attack into a cloud), since you can just bounce the cloaks. This of course requires that you keep an appropriate hand, but that&#8217;s part of the learning process of playing a combo deck. The biggest flaw of the deck is that the combo, while very powerful, doesn&#8217;t actually win the game on the spot and, depending on what they have, they might still be in it if you too many storm enablers. Also, it&#8217;s very complicated to play well against the field and requires a good understanding of the metagame to know which hands are keepable, which doesn&#8217;t make it newbie friendly.  </p>
<p>If you&#8217;re interested in getting playtest partners who won&#8217;t accused you of cheating/play awkward decks, feel free to contact myself (Brussky on MTGO) or any of the regulars on the PDC forums, I&#8217;m sure a lot of people would jump at the chance to play pauper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: weefunkster</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/beggars-can-be-choosers-a-metagame-focused-view-of-a-deck-of-the-month/comment-page-1/#comment-4470</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[weefunkster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 02:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=11856#comment-4470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Could you maybe make videos with commentary on the next article? Ive been looking for videos of people playing this deck and found a few but they dont have voice overs]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could you maybe make videos with commentary on the next article? Ive been looking for videos of people playing this deck and found a few but they dont have voice overs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: juggernaut1002</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/beggars-can-be-choosers-a-metagame-focused-view-of-a-deck-of-the-month/comment-page-1/#comment-4469</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[juggernaut1002]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 22:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=11856#comment-4469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excellent first article.  I look forward to this series.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent first article.  I look forward to this series.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pk</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/beggars-can-be-choosers-a-metagame-focused-view-of-a-deck-of-the-month/comment-page-1/#comment-4467</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 17:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=11856#comment-4467</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I noticed at one point to chose to draw.  This deck (and every popular pauper deck in the current meta) wants to play first.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed at one point to chose to draw.  This deck (and every popular pauper deck in the current meta) wants to play first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
