<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Beggars CAN Be Choosers: A Monthly Metagame-Focused View of a Deck</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/beggars-can-be-choosers-a-monthly-metagame-focused-view-of-a-deck/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/beggars-can-be-choosers-a-monthly-metagame-focused-view-of-a-deck/</link>
	<description>The prime source for Magic the Gathering strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2017 22:21:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: toxic fungus</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/beggars-can-be-choosers-a-monthly-metagame-focused-view-of-a-deck/comment-page-1/#comment-4683</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[toxic fungus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 13:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=12021#comment-4683</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ranth: Thanks for the thoughts on replays, any ideas are very useful (and that last one is a good one!)

SaiDes: I would love to bring these decks into the most competetive formats I can, for the sake of this series. My main issues with these is scheduling. I will look into heading into more Dailies/PRE&#039;s where possible. My issues are that I have children to get to sleep every night, and this severely limits the events I can enter with realistic hopes to be &quot;present&quot; for. I do try to look around for those events that I can fit inot the schedule, but they are more difficult to time than you might imagine :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ranth: Thanks for the thoughts on replays, any ideas are very useful (and that last one is a good one!)</p>
<p>SaiDes: I would love to bring these decks into the most competetive formats I can, for the sake of this series. My main issues with these is scheduling. I will look into heading into more Dailies/PRE&#8217;s where possible. My issues are that I have children to get to sleep every night, and this severely limits the events I can enter with realistic hopes to be &#8220;present&#8221; for. I do try to look around for those events that I can fit inot the schedule, but they are more difficult to time than you might imagine <img src="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" class="wp-smiley" /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SaiDes</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/beggars-can-be-choosers-a-monthly-metagame-focused-view-of-a-deck/comment-page-1/#comment-4682</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SaiDes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 12:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=12021#comment-4682</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Also, maybe it would be good to test out the decks in a PRE? They are generally very competetive and will allow for a better range of competetive opponents than just in the tourney practice room.
The whole article doesn&#039;t have to be centered into a PRE but maybe you could build a deck and discuss it and then take it for a spin in one of the weekly PRE tournaments and then write about the results in that way?
Just a thought!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, maybe it would be good to test out the decks in a PRE? They are generally very competetive and will allow for a better range of competetive opponents than just in the tourney practice room.<br />
The whole article doesn&#8217;t have to be centered into a PRE but maybe you could build a deck and discuss it and then take it for a spin in one of the weekly PRE tournaments and then write about the results in that way?<br />
Just a thought!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ranth</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/beggars-can-be-choosers-a-monthly-metagame-focused-view-of-a-deck/comment-page-1/#comment-4680</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ranth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 19:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=12021#comment-4680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh your plan on how to deal with the replay issue is fine. I was mainly commenting on that to let people know the how it happens even if we dont know the exact of the why.

 However if you plan to make notes ect right after games you can catch the replay on the &quot;completed games&quot; in the tourney pratice room it might take a little searching but if you&#039;re quick you&#039;ll be able to catch them even if the server didnt save the game to you &quot;recently played&quot; games list. I hope that helps.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh your plan on how to deal with the replay issue is fine. I was mainly commenting on that to let people know the how it happens even if we dont know the exact of the why.</p>
<p> However if you plan to make notes ect right after games you can catch the replay on the &#8220;completed games&#8221; in the tourney pratice room it might take a little searching but if you&#8217;re quick you&#8217;ll be able to catch them even if the server didnt save the game to you &#8220;recently played&#8221; games list. I hope that helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toxic fungus</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/beggars-can-be-choosers-a-monthly-metagame-focused-view-of-a-deck/comment-page-1/#comment-4679</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[toxic fungus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 18:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=12021#comment-4679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ranth: Thanks very much for the detailed comments, I greatly appreciate it, and think it really benefits the readers as well! To address your points:
1) Yes, I will almost always be doing this, this month was just tough time-wise. You are correct.

2) Honestly, the board here is taken from decklists of winning goblins decks (mostly, I had to fudge a few cards for lack of owning them, like the 2 pyroblasts). I do think the Gorilla Shaman&#039;s are warranted, but agree about the anti aggro stuff. I will certainly look into adjusting it as I move forward.

3) The thunderbolt was there, again, due to a lack of a fourth chain lightning, and the fact that I love Thunderbolt. I will try to tighten up these lists in the future so they are as close to perfect as possible, with no cards missing due to my own collection. i can and will be buying the needed cards. Again, this month was a bit nuts. 

I appreciate the concerns wrt the replays, but feel that in most cases my notes (made after matches), my screencaps, and my replays when available, will be plenty to reconstruct game-states for discussion. I do appreciate everyone&#039;s comments as to how to best handle this, so feel free to comment if you have an idea.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ranth: Thanks very much for the detailed comments, I greatly appreciate it, and think it really benefits the readers as well! To address your points:<br />
1) Yes, I will almost always be doing this, this month was just tough time-wise. You are correct.</p>
<p>2) Honestly, the board here is taken from decklists of winning goblins decks (mostly, I had to fudge a few cards for lack of owning them, like the 2 pyroblasts). I do think the Gorilla Shaman&#8217;s are warranted, but agree about the anti aggro stuff. I will certainly look into adjusting it as I move forward.</p>
<p>3) The thunderbolt was there, again, due to a lack of a fourth chain lightning, and the fact that I love Thunderbolt. I will try to tighten up these lists in the future so they are as close to perfect as possible, with no cards missing due to my own collection. i can and will be buying the needed cards. Again, this month was a bit nuts. </p>
<p>I appreciate the concerns wrt the replays, but feel that in most cases my notes (made after matches), my screencaps, and my replays when available, will be plenty to reconstruct game-states for discussion. I do appreciate everyone&#8217;s comments as to how to best handle this, so feel free to comment if you have an idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ranth</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/beggars-can-be-choosers-a-monthly-metagame-focused-view-of-a-deck/comment-page-1/#comment-4678</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ranth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 16:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=12021#comment-4678</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice to see another player trying their feet into the pauper pools!
I got a few comments here so please bear with me on this wall i&#039;m about to drop.

#1) ALWAYS play matches when in the tournament room as it is sideboards that make the primary difference between a casual deck/game and a tourney one.

#2) Your sideboard looks to be completely geared toward anti aggro (affinity maybe?)
Perhaps you could explain the card choices in it to us?
Personally i&#039;d change it to look like 

4 Pyroblast (good vs storm AND MuC)
4 Raze (yes you sacrifice a land for this but this can be beating vs both storm decks)
4 Seismic Shudder
3 Flaring Pain ( This is for against any deck with pro red effects such as WW or Slivers)

The reason i suggest these changes are because goblins is one of the best aggro decks in the format usually you can just keep the pressure up and win most races so I see little reason to have your sideboard slow that plan down just to slow your opponent down at the same time? 

Now Storm is your main bogey man here ans that&#039;s what I have chose to focus on.
Nailing a rav bounce land or sac land can at times set the storm decks back a turn or two giving you enough time to get those last points of damage in. In some cases it just flat shuts them down if you&#039;re lucky.

Thunderbolt used to be a red deck staple so its fine but as others have mentioned it would not be a first choice nowdays personally since MuC is not as common as it once was.

Lastly the reason that not all the games are recorded is because for some reason when either your or your opponent concede a game MTGO has a high chance of just not recording it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice to see another player trying their feet into the pauper pools!<br />
I got a few comments here so please bear with me on this wall i&#8217;m about to drop.</p>
<p>#1) ALWAYS play matches when in the tournament room as it is sideboards that make the primary difference between a casual deck/game and a tourney one.</p>
<p>#2) Your sideboard looks to be completely geared toward anti aggro (affinity maybe?)<br />
Perhaps you could explain the card choices in it to us?<br />
Personally i&#8217;d change it to look like </p>
<p>4 Pyroblast (good vs storm AND MuC)<br />
4 Raze (yes you sacrifice a land for this but this can be beating vs both storm decks)<br />
4 Seismic Shudder<br />
3 Flaring Pain ( This is for against any deck with pro red effects such as WW or Slivers)</p>
<p>The reason i suggest these changes are because goblins is one of the best aggro decks in the format usually you can just keep the pressure up and win most races so I see little reason to have your sideboard slow that plan down just to slow your opponent down at the same time? </p>
<p>Now Storm is your main bogey man here ans that&#8217;s what I have chose to focus on.<br />
Nailing a rav bounce land or sac land can at times set the storm decks back a turn or two giving you enough time to get those last points of damage in. In some cases it just flat shuts them down if you&#8217;re lucky.</p>
<p>Thunderbolt used to be a red deck staple so its fine but as others have mentioned it would not be a first choice nowdays personally since MuC is not as common as it once was.</p>
<p>Lastly the reason that not all the games are recorded is because for some reason when either your or your opponent concede a game MTGO has a high chance of just not recording it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toxic fungus</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/beggars-can-be-choosers-a-monthly-metagame-focused-view-of-a-deck/comment-page-1/#comment-4661</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[toxic fungus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 12:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=12021#comment-4661</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[milegyenanevem: Yeah, I&#039;ve always liked banding just to completely mess with my opponents, who never understand it correctly :)
 
Goblins have the suberb advantage of being bigger for the same cost, in general, as well as having synergies that make blocking really a nightmare for the opponent. Give it a go, and let us know what you think back here if you get a chance.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>milegyenanevem: Yeah, I&#8217;ve always liked banding just to completely mess with my opponents, who never understand it correctly <img src="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" class="wp-smiley" /> </p>
<p>Goblins have the suberb advantage of being bigger for the same cost, in general, as well as having synergies that make blocking really a nightmare for the opponent. Give it a go, and let us know what you think back here if you get a chance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: milegyenanevem</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/beggars-can-be-choosers-a-monthly-metagame-focused-view-of-a-deck/comment-page-1/#comment-4660</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[milegyenanevem]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 07:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=12021#comment-4660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, my very first deck contained four of Benalish Hero, Icatian Infantry, Tundra Wolves :) Those little guys could band together, but I still hope the Goblins will prove to be more effective.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, my very first deck contained four of Benalish Hero, Icatian Infantry, Tundra Wolves <img src="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" class="wp-smiley" />  Those little guys could band together, but I still hope the Goblins will prove to be more effective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
