<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Building Blocks: Geist Vengeance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/building-blocks-geist-vengeance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/building-blocks-geist-vengeance/</link>
	<description>The prime source for Magic the Gathering strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2017 22:21:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee McLeod</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/building-blocks-geist-vengeance/comment-page-1/#comment-7321</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lee McLeod]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=15362#comment-7321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Griff: You&#039;re right! Man, I played terribly in these videos.

@Anon: Both! I have a bad habit of selling cards I&#039;ll need later in the future for cards I need immediately for bad Modern brews. These brews never work out (ESPER HEARTLESS SUMMONING, YEAH!) and I end up having to buy back the cards I sold for the full amount. I&#039;m trying to get out of that, hence why I needed to &#039;finish&#039; a playset of Garruks before I built up to Dark Ascension. 

I know cards are cheap during release week and that cards get significantly cheaper when they rotate out of Standard, but that&#039;s the extent of my economy knowledge. I don&#039;t try to speculate on anything because I&#039;m terrible at it and am sure that I will just buy 300 of a flop. I try to watch cards prices, and if they are going down and I need them, I&#039;ll buy them. But I don&#039;t know what causes these trends; I just try to keep an eye on them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Griff: You&#8217;re right! Man, I played terribly in these videos.</p>
<p>@Anon: Both! I have a bad habit of selling cards I&#8217;ll need later in the future for cards I need immediately for bad Modern brews. These brews never work out (ESPER HEARTLESS SUMMONING, YEAH!) and I end up having to buy back the cards I sold for the full amount. I&#8217;m trying to get out of that, hence why I needed to &#8216;finish&#8217; a playset of Garruks before I built up to Dark Ascension. </p>
<p>I know cards are cheap during release week and that cards get significantly cheaper when they rotate out of Standard, but that&#8217;s the extent of my economy knowledge. I don&#8217;t try to speculate on anything because I&#8217;m terrible at it and am sure that I will just buy 300 of a flop. I try to watch cards prices, and if they are going down and I need them, I&#8217;ll buy them. But I don&#8217;t know what causes these trends; I just try to keep an eye on them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/building-blocks-geist-vengeance/comment-page-1/#comment-7317</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 21:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=15362#comment-7317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lee, love the videos, a question:

You were talking about buying Garruks, but in a previous video said you own a playset of Innistrad.  Which is it?  :p

Also, as the resident block man on here, do you dabble in MTGO economy/finance at all?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lee, love the videos, a question:</p>
<p>You were talking about buying Garruks, but in a previous video said you own a playset of Innistrad.  Which is it?  :p</p>
<p>Also, as the resident block man on here, do you dabble in MTGO economy/finance at all?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Royal</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/building-blocks-geist-vengeance/comment-page-1/#comment-7313</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Royal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=15362#comment-7313</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good evening, ladies. I heard www.blockdeconstructed.com mentioned and, well, I just had to drop a line. :-)

Delver of Secrets: The original version had 4, but he eventually was cut. The format is heavy on Geistflame, Devil&#039;s Play, Dead Weight, removal in general, and the Planeswalkers also eat up creatures. He just wasn&#039;t worth the while.

Thanks for the namedrop. And, the deck is by no means easy to play - there&#039;s a lot of math going on with all the burn and Devil&#039;s Play, and you have to know when to push your creatures, and when to sit back and play lands for the burn. The Sideboard is also precise, and if you don&#039;t know the plans, then it&#039;ll still run, but with some kinks in it. ;] On the plus side, as Toasty points out and is generally the case with rogue decks, your opponents were confused and misplayed.

I didn&#039;t watch the videos, but Kyle: Paraselene is part of the Sideboard plan against U/R Stalker. The full Sideboarding details can be found a few pages down at themtgodojo.com - everything is a bit out of date, but it ought to give you the general idea. I&#039;ve mainly been playing BUG the past few weeks, but I think that Watchkeep is still underrated and I think that this style of deck (URx Tempo) will be much more popular with Dark Ascension.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good evening, ladies. I heard <a href="http://www.blockdeconstructed.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.blockdeconstructed.com</a> mentioned and, well, I just had to drop a line. <img src="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":-)" class="wp-smiley" /> </p>
<p>Delver of Secrets: The original version had 4, but he eventually was cut. The format is heavy on Geistflame, Devil&#8217;s Play, Dead Weight, removal in general, and the Planeswalkers also eat up creatures. He just wasn&#8217;t worth the while.</p>
<p>Thanks for the namedrop. And, the deck is by no means easy to play &#8211; there&#8217;s a lot of math going on with all the burn and Devil&#8217;s Play, and you have to know when to push your creatures, and when to sit back and play lands for the burn. The Sideboard is also precise, and if you don&#8217;t know the plans, then it&#8217;ll still run, but with some kinks in it. ;] On the plus side, as Toasty points out and is generally the case with rogue decks, your opponents were confused and misplayed.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t watch the videos, but Kyle: Paraselene is part of the Sideboard plan against U/R Stalker. The full Sideboarding details can be found a few pages down at themtgodojo.com &#8211; everything is a bit out of date, but it ought to give you the general idea. I&#8217;ve mainly been playing BUG the past few weeks, but I think that Watchkeep is still underrated and I think that this style of deck (URx Tempo) will be much more popular with Dark Ascension.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/building-blocks-geist-vengeance/comment-page-1/#comment-7302</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kyle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=15362#comment-7302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why would you not board in Paraselene against the UR deck match 3? You seem to scoop to +x/+2 on Invisible Stalker.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would you not board in Paraselene against the UR deck match 3? You seem to scoop to +x/+2 on Invisible Stalker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Griff</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/building-blocks-geist-vengeance/comment-page-1/#comment-7295</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Griff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=15362#comment-7295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Round 3 G2 you devils play the wolf for 3 (He hasn&#039;t got the mana for the activation of the Gavony Township) and do 2 to Garruk, this seems bad when reversed you would have once again cleared his board.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Round 3 G2 you devils play the wolf for 3 (He hasn&#8217;t got the mana for the activation of the Gavony Township) and do 2 to Garruk, this seems bad when reversed you would have once again cleared his board.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheCrippler250</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/building-blocks-geist-vengeance/comment-page-1/#comment-7291</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TheCrippler250]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 19:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=15362#comment-7291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ha ha, fair enough. If it gives me headaches there is always text to speech and pretending he&#039;s a robot. Thanks again.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha ha, fair enough. If it gives me headaches there is always text to speech and pretending he&#8217;s a robot. Thanks again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee McLeod</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/building-blocks-geist-vengeance/comment-page-1/#comment-7289</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lee McLeod]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=15362#comment-7289</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@TheCrippler250: He used to blog on themtgodojo.com , but he said in the last daily that he&#039;s moving away from it and towards blockdeconstructed.com. Warning: Royal is not known for his web development skills.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@TheCrippler250: He used to blog on themtgodojo.com , but he said in the last daily that he&#8217;s moving away from it and towards blockdeconstructed.com. Warning: Royal is not known for his web development skills.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
