<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Common Denominator: &#8220;Green/White Aggro&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/common-denominator-greenwhite-aggro/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/common-denominator-greenwhite-aggro/</link>
	<description>The prime source for Magic the Gathering strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2017 22:21:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zage</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/common-denominator-greenwhite-aggro/comment-page-1/#comment-1420</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zage]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 14:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=7039#comment-1420</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Too bad you got two concessions and at least one pretty weak opponent, but it was a fun video to watch regardless. 

Next time I would personally prefer to see matches in the tournament practice room though, as there is less of a chance you face the weak decks and also because the opponents are more likely to fight for their chances instead of conceding when they still have a shot.

Maybe matches instead of single games, too.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too bad you got two concessions and at least one pretty weak opponent, but it was a fun video to watch regardless. </p>
<p>Next time I would personally prefer to see matches in the tournament practice room though, as there is less of a chance you face the weak decks and also because the opponents are more likely to fight for their chances instead of conceding when they still have a shot.</p>
<p>Maybe matches instead of single games, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin Russell (RoninX)</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/common-denominator-greenwhite-aggro/comment-page-1/#comment-1166</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robin Russell (RoninX)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 17:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=7039#comment-1166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You had 3 mana up when you cast the outlander, that is why he didn&#039;t mana leak it.

People in the casual room often only seem interested in playing if their decks are &quot;working&quot; regardless of whether a game is out of reach or not, but two have people concede two perfectly winnable games in a row while you are recording is a real bummer.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You had 3 mana up when you cast the outlander, that is why he didn&#8217;t mana leak it.</p>
<p>People in the casual room often only seem interested in playing if their decks are &#8220;working&#8221; regardless of whether a game is out of reach or not, but two have people concede two perfectly winnable games in a row while you are recording is a real bummer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ranth</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/common-denominator-greenwhite-aggro/comment-page-1/#comment-1149</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ranth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 23:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=7039#comment-1149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I apoligize if i didnt say it in the video this is one of My casual fun decks that has competitive roots swap a few cards around however and you got a deck that can really post up some nice results. And yes Strands isnt the solve all to storm but really its pretty much that and holy light in green/white]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I apoligize if i didnt say it in the video this is one of My casual fun decks that has competitive roots swap a few cards around however and you got a deck that can really post up some nice results. And yes Strands isnt the solve all to storm but really its pretty much that and holy light in green/white</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CSeraph</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/common-denominator-greenwhite-aggro/comment-page-1/#comment-1145</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CSeraph]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 17:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=7039#comment-1145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The deck seems very strong against the meta. Few comments:

I don&#039;t think prismatic strands is adequate vs. storm, but your colours may not have better hate.

Mourning Thrull seems extremely weak. I&#039;m sure you can find a better card in its slot.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The deck seems very strong against the meta. Few comments:</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think prismatic strands is adequate vs. storm, but your colours may not have better hate.</p>
<p>Mourning Thrull seems extremely weak. I&#8217;m sure you can find a better card in its slot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ranth</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/common-denominator-greenwhite-aggro/comment-page-1/#comment-1139</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ranth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 22:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=7039#comment-1139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yep i&#039;m aware of that and that&#039;s why putting two cloaks on a single critter can get pretty insane.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep i&#8217;m aware of that and that&#8217;s why putting two cloaks on a single critter can get pretty insane.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: inneutral</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/common-denominator-greenwhite-aggro/comment-page-1/#comment-1137</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[inneutral]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 17:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=7039#comment-1137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A purely technical point, but Armadillo Cloak does not use the lifelink keyword either (evidently wizards wanted to preserve the option of cloaking your enemy&#039;s fattie!), so even if morning thrull had lifelink, it would still give you 6 life when cloaked (15 when double cloaked).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A purely technical point, but Armadillo Cloak does not use the lifelink keyword either (evidently wizards wanted to preserve the option of cloaking your enemy&#8217;s fattie!), so even if morning thrull had lifelink, it would still give you 6 life when cloaked (15 when double cloaked).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
