<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Common Sense: Weighing in on Removal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/common-sense-weighing-in-on-removal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/common-sense-weighing-in-on-removal/</link>
	<description>The prime source for Magic the Gathering strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2017 22:21:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Afraidman</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/common-sense-weighing-in-on-removal/comment-page-1/#comment-6538</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Afraidman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 20:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=14635#comment-6538</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;re face is kinda freaking me out.  You look like Kenneth from 30 Rock as a cannibal youth.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re face is kinda freaking me out.  You look like Kenneth from 30 Rock as a cannibal youth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neros</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/common-sense-weighing-in-on-removal/comment-page-1/#comment-6528</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neros]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 09:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=14635#comment-6528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Love the list. Its got the same kind of idea I have done with a few of my casual decks and it has works wonders if it gets going in time. Can&#039;t wait for the mulligan article as I find that to be one of the toughest things to figure out correctly.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love the list. Its got the same kind of idea I have done with a few of my casual decks and it has works wonders if it gets going in time. Can&#8217;t wait for the mulligan article as I find that to be one of the toughest things to figure out correctly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deluxeicoff</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/common-sense-weighing-in-on-removal/comment-page-1/#comment-6526</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[deluxeicoff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 08:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=14635#comment-6526</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great rundown - my particular &quot;Deluxered&quot; storm deck (mtgstats.com) uses seal of fire and lava-darts, (often forgotten to be flashed-back while tapped out) vs. Echoing Decay style removal.  One just has to redirect a synergistic spell to negate blacks main answer.  Neat to see black/white again, but 4x Orzhov seems REALLY slow and bad imo.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great rundown &#8211; my particular &#8220;Deluxered&#8221; storm deck (mtgstats.com) uses seal of fire and lava-darts, (often forgotten to be flashed-back while tapped out) vs. Echoing Decay style removal.  One just has to redirect a synergistic spell to negate blacks main answer.  Neat to see black/white again, but 4x Orzhov seems REALLY slow and bad imo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
