Comments on: Dime a Dozen #11: The War Isn’t Over

By: Jason Moore

Jason Moore — Tue, 11 Dec 2012 13:31:36 +0000

Wait, it looks like there wasn’t a second Strands in my graveyard at that point T_T

By: Jason Moore

Jason Moore — Mon, 10 Dec 2012 01:34:37 +0000

Tom the Scud – I think you’re saying that on my final turn I should’ve attacked with Unicorn rather than Traveler (so that I would have “two” creatures available for Strands flashback)? If so, then I can definitely see the merit in that play.

Anonymous – Sounds like you’re talking about M4, not M3.

You’re correct if you meant that I could play Bonesplitter, bounce it with Skyfisher and play it again. I don’t think I would’ve made that play even if I had caught it though.

As for your second comment, I’m not sure I understand. Are you talking about 31:55 into the video? Can I not flashback Prismatic Strands by tapping Armorer in response to the Witch activation? Let me know.

Thanks guys!

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 09 Dec 2012 23:40:10 +0000

On the turn in M3G1 when you said “can I cast 3 spells this turn? no”, you had 4 mana and both bonesplitter and skyfisher in hand so the answer was “yes” :).

Also, was I missing somethign with why your opponent didn’t witches in response to your flaring pain late in M3G2 when you double blocked the dead reveller? That would have put him to one, but his reveller would have survived and your board would have looked much worse.

By: Tom the Scud

Tom the Scud — Sun, 09 Dec 2012 08:43:34 +0000

M1G3 You were probably better off leaving the doomed traveler back for flashback purposes since you’d still have an untapped thingy even if he killed the traveler.

I think I also would have sideboarded in some standard bearers against storm to help protect your unicorns.

By: Lantis

Lantis — Thu, 06 Dec 2012 11:40:03 +0000

@deluxeicoff

No offense, but you need Ranger + Archer to nullify efect of one armorer. Sure, you having these 2 specific cards on the board, and me not having journey or second armorer is very good for you adn pretty much over for my falcons/hawks, but considering a) there are other creatures in my deck resilient to archer-ranger combo (and even more those creatures with armorer on the table) and b) Scattershot Archer comes usually up to second/third game from the sideboard, i’ll take those odds every day.

By: redsquare

redsquare — Thu, 06 Dec 2012 02:40:22 +0000

@1smashmouthFAN:
He is playing a pauper deck, which means only commons, which conflicts with Thragtusk’s rarity.
Also, this might get in the way of the whole “Monowhite” thing. Not that I think Thragtusk is bad though.

By: #1smashmouthFAN

#1smashmouthFAN — Thu, 06 Dec 2012 00:59:20 +0000

u should play thragtusk over loyal cathar.