<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dime a Dozen #21: Let’s Brew Pauper with Dragon’s Maze</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/dime-a-dozen-21-lets-brew-pauper-with-dragons-maze/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/dime-a-dozen-21-lets-brew-pauper-with-dragons-maze/</link>
	<description>The prime source for Magic the Gathering strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2017 22:21:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Moore</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/dime-a-dozen-21-lets-brew-pauper-with-dragons-maze/comment-page-1/#comment-54922</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Moore]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 21:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=23468#comment-54922</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Greystone - It&#039;s a good time to be a Fiend fan. I appreciate the comment!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greystone &#8211; It&#8217;s a good time to be a Fiend fan. I appreciate the comment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greystone</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/dime-a-dozen-21-lets-brew-pauper-with-dragons-maze/comment-page-1/#comment-54896</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greystone]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 11:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=23468#comment-54896</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Love the Wee Fiend deck, and I can&#039;t help but think after our lengthly discussion that it was posted &#039;just for Me&#039;. lol  Can&#039;t wait for this set to drop online so I can take My version of that puppy and start kicking some tail!

Side note:  Built My own WW deck last night, very fun to play!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love the Wee Fiend deck, and I can&#8217;t help but think after our lengthly discussion that it was posted &#8216;just for Me&#8217;. lol  Can&#8217;t wait for this set to drop online so I can take My version of that puppy and start kicking some tail!</p>
<p>Side note:  Built My own WW deck last night, very fun to play!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Moore</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/dime-a-dozen-21-lets-brew-pauper-with-dragons-maze/comment-page-1/#comment-54728</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Moore]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 08:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=23468#comment-54728</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tom the Scud - I don&#039;t think Alchemy is better in this deck. Never going to flash it back, and being an instant barely helps this strategy at all. I could be wrong though!

Kragg - I really appreciate your support, and your observations!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom the Scud &#8211; I don&#8217;t think Alchemy is better in this deck. Never going to flash it back, and being an instant barely helps this strategy at all. I could be wrong though!</p>
<p>Kragg &#8211; I really appreciate your support, and your observations!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kragg</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/dime-a-dozen-21-lets-brew-pauper-with-dragons-maze/comment-page-1/#comment-54725</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kragg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 07:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=23468#comment-54725</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well done Jason, and greetings for your well-written article. I do agree that DGM won&#039;t be enough shaking for the Classic metagame, except maybe for a couple of cards like nivix cyclop (which may get izzet fiend tier 1?) and maybe drawn in filth or wake the reflections. there are also good cards for classic pauper, but i doubt they will be so good to reach high competitive lvl.

Even tho&#039; I don&#039;t think your dimir tortured may be the best way to deal with pilfered plans, I do apreciate a lot your efforts in finding a good home for a new boros aggro deck. Even in your previous article, i found rly good ideas about a boros aggro build, and I&#039;m sure we may found a competitive build.

Thanks once more for your articles, and keep up the good job!

Cheers
Giulio Taddei (iKragg on MTGO)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well done Jason, and greetings for your well-written article. I do agree that DGM won&#8217;t be enough shaking for the Classic metagame, except maybe for a couple of cards like nivix cyclop (which may get izzet fiend tier 1?) and maybe drawn in filth or wake the reflections. there are also good cards for classic pauper, but i doubt they will be so good to reach high competitive lvl.</p>
<p>Even tho&#8217; I don&#8217;t think your dimir tortured may be the best way to deal with pilfered plans, I do apreciate a lot your efforts in finding a good home for a new boros aggro deck. Even in your previous article, i found rly good ideas about a boros aggro build, and I&#8217;m sure we may found a competitive build.</p>
<p>Thanks once more for your articles, and keep up the good job!</p>
<p>Cheers<br />
Giulio Taddei (iKragg on MTGO)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom the Scud</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/dime-a-dozen-21-lets-brew-pauper-with-dragons-maze/comment-page-1/#comment-54721</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom the Scud]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 02:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=23468#comment-54721</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On pilfered plans in a TE deck, I just don&#039;t see a reason to use it over [card]Forbidden Alchemy[/card] - yeah plus one card, but you lose the ability to choose, and trade instant for sorcery. And I often find Alchemy nearly uncastable in my own Dimir TE build due to the mana cost, even so.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On pilfered plans in a TE deck, I just don&#8217;t see a reason to use it over <a href="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/wp-content/plugins/mtgo-wp-mtg-helper/mtg_helper_cardfinder.php?find=Forbidden+Alchemy&width=223&height=310" class="jTip" name="Forbidden Alchemy">Forbidden Alchemy</a> &#8211; yeah plus one card, but you lose the ability to choose, and trade instant for sorcery. And I often find Alchemy nearly uncastable in my own Dimir TE build due to the mana cost, even so.<img src='http://gatherer.wizards.com/Handlers/Image.ashx?size=small&type=card&name=Forbidden Alchemy&options=' style='display:none;width:1px;height:1px;' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Moore</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/dime-a-dozen-21-lets-brew-pauper-with-dragons-maze/comment-page-1/#comment-54709</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Moore]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 19:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=23468#comment-54709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[^
Above comment is in fact me :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^<br />
Above comment is in fact me <img src="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" class="wp-smiley" /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Moore</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/dime-a-dozen-21-lets-brew-pauper-with-dragons-maze/comment-page-1/#comment-54708</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Moore]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 19:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=23468#comment-54708</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tom the Scud - Ah yes, there we go. Not sure either.

mathisje - They might be better in the board. I&#039;m worried that playing Blessing, Growth and Probe will put us too low on life (maybe it won&#039;t). If so, I&#039;d 100% play Blessing over Growth. 

manicfold - Very true. 

Cyrulean - Yeah, the list gets narrower with 4x more guys.

Vermiis - Great suggestions, and I appreciate the support!

Warboss - We&#039;ll see if you&#039;re right about Strings and Clues (I&#039;m not convinced). The pump spell loses a lot of utility being sorcery speed. 

JS Bangs - Glad you could add some input!

BobBoberson - I don&#039;t think so. It doesn&#039;t do enough to impact a game. 

MiFraDeLa88 - That sounds pretty neat! As for Stings in Post, not sure that would cut it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom the Scud &#8211; Ah yes, there we go. Not sure either.</p>
<p>mathisje &#8211; They might be better in the board. I&#8217;m worried that playing Blessing, Growth and Probe will put us too low on life (maybe it won&#8217;t). If so, I&#8217;d 100% play Blessing over Growth. </p>
<p>manicfold &#8211; Very true. </p>
<p>Cyrulean &#8211; Yeah, the list gets narrower with 4x more guys.</p>
<p>Vermiis &#8211; Great suggestions, and I appreciate the support!</p>
<p>Warboss &#8211; We&#8217;ll see if you&#8217;re right about Strings and Clues (I&#8217;m not convinced). The pump spell loses a lot of utility being sorcery speed. </p>
<p>JS Bangs &#8211; Glad you could add some input!</p>
<p>BobBoberson &#8211; I don&#8217;t think so. It doesn&#8217;t do enough to impact a game. </p>
<p>MiFraDeLa88 &#8211; That sounds pretty neat! As for Stings in Post, not sure that would cut it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
