<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dime a Dozen #58: Weenie Roast</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/dime-a-dozen-58-weenie-roast/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/dime-a-dozen-58-weenie-roast/</link>
	<description>The prime source for Magic the Gathering strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2017 22:21:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Moore</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/dime-a-dozen-58-weenie-roast/comment-page-1/#comment-212820</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Moore]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2014 23:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=32025#comment-212820</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[xiaosha - Thanks for the comment! In my opinion the cons outweigh the pros. 

Acolyte doesn&#039;t completely blank Skred, it occasionally blanks Skred when we can afford to keep up mana and make the assumption that they&#039;re holding it. That line also assumes we have a creature better than Acolyte on the table that we want to protect, so why not just play creatures better than Acolyte altogether? 

The creature matchups need to be fought on the board, and a 1/1 for two mana is a terrible rate that doesn&#039;t fight a single creature in their deck.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>xiaosha &#8211; Thanks for the comment! In my opinion the cons outweigh the pros. </p>
<p>Acolyte doesn&#8217;t completely blank Skred, it occasionally blanks Skred when we can afford to keep up mana and make the assumption that they&#8217;re holding it. That line also assumes we have a creature better than Acolyte on the table that we want to protect, so why not just play creatures better than Acolyte altogether? </p>
<p>The creature matchups need to be fought on the board, and a 1/1 for two mana is a terrible rate that doesn&#8217;t fight a single creature in their deck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xiaosha</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/dime-a-dozen-58-weenie-roast/comment-page-1/#comment-212748</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[xiaosha]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2014 18:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=32025#comment-212748</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[R1: How is bringing in Crimson Acolyte bad? It completely blanks the Skreds, and foils Tribal Flames some of the time. The protection extends to other creatures too. And, it&#039;s a weenie like the rest.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>R1: How is bringing in Crimson Acolyte bad? It completely blanks the Skreds, and foils Tribal Flames some of the time. The protection extends to other creatures too. And, it&#8217;s a weenie like the rest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
