Comments on: Dime a Dozen #61: Krark-Clan 2-Mans

By: najay1

najay1 — Thu, 29 Jan 2015 01:02:58 +0000

Interesting videos, the deck is certainly interesting and I do really like Krak-Clan in Affinity, but I find that the best card with it is Flayer Husk and the lack of it in this list is quite strange. Not only is flayer husk a great card just regularly in Affinity, the ability to wipe any 1/1s and deal 1 damage each turn is fantastic and helps shore up some of Affinities worst match-ups. I would at least take out 1 land and the terrarions for the Flayers.

Either way, thanks for the content!

By: placeholder

placeholder — Mon, 19 Jan 2015 07:54:26 +0000

@slug360 how can you make a claim of racial equality after your frankly disgusting comments on the LR draft? http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-holiday-cube-2/ It’s pretty clear you’ve got issues, and you’re long-winded, faux-polite rhetoric does little to hide your biases. It’s clear you don’t like Jason’s work. Whatever. Walk away. You’re actively trying to make this place unpleasant for him, and succeeding in making it pretty unpleasant all around.

Jason, man, I can’t believe how toxic the internet can be. As Bryan Stevenson says “Keep your eye on the prize, hold on.”

By: slug360

slug360 — Sat, 17 Jan 2015 09:37:38 +0000

Foolish fool? What a commanding grasp you have of the language, Burt.

“I like seeing rogue or rogue-ish decks” and then you talk about how you enjoyed the videos of the quirky obscure new deck in Pauper that is Affinity. Truly a pioneering decklist.

By: burt

burt — Sat, 17 Jan 2015 09:20:09 +0000

Slug is a foolish fool. I like vids, I prefer if the player wins but you don’t have to, I like seeing rogue or rogue-ish decks.

By: deluxeicoff

deluxeicoff — Sat, 17 Jan 2015 03:00:14 +0000

Doesn’t work for me – when I go to root menu and select ‘articles’ his isn’t there, just on the front page.

By: deluxeicoff

deluxeicoff — Sat, 17 Jan 2015 01:58:57 +0000

SLug – I see your point, but in defense of JM, he never labeled it an ‘article’ – think of it like the various video coverage of GP’s round/round coverage etc…,

I’m a fan of the written word as well. Additionally, it’s hard for me to NOT ‘auto-label’ these efforts as ‘lazy’ – (at least from a writers perspective), but that’s like me getting mad that my bicycle doesn’t get good gas mileage! Bikes don’t use gas, and this effort never said it was an ‘article.’ I feel your criticism would hold a lot more water if he claimed it was an ‘article’ – but he never did as far as I can see…correct me if I’m wrong. Had he labeled it a ‘video diary’ or something like that, would you have a problem with it then?

I’m on neither side…but from an outsiders perspective, you really seem like your gunning personally for him…whether this is accurate or not, the perception is there.

By: Balarasse

Balarasse — Fri, 16 Jan 2015 20:07:37 +0000

Jason,
Thanks for the vids.

Slug,
Please use the energy you spend on your comments to write pauper articles.
I would be glad to read/watch them.
“Criticizing is always easy, it’s the doing that’s difficult” (Philippe Destouches)

Cheers!