<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Draftcandy #2: DTK Draft #1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/draftcandy-2-dtk-draft-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/draftcandy-2-dtk-draft-1/</link>
	<description>The prime source for Magic the Gathering strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2017 22:21:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: NovaSandler</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/draftcandy-2-dtk-draft-1/comment-page-1/#comment-229535</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NovaSandler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2015 02:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=33586#comment-229535</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thomas: Being a 2 color set is the biggest difference.  It&#039;s a lot easier to stay open in the draft to find which colors are under-drafted.

Tdoggy: Lurker is always going to be good, where Wilds will be good some of the time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thomas: Being a 2 color set is the biggest difference.  It&#8217;s a lot easier to stay open in the draft to find which colors are under-drafted.</p>
<p>Tdoggy: Lurker is always going to be good, where Wilds will be good some of the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tdoggy</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/draftcandy-2-dtk-draft-1/comment-page-1/#comment-229488</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tdoggy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2015 23:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=33586#comment-229488</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gudul lurker is an ok card but shouldn&#039;t evolving wilds be rated more highly because the rares in FR are so good.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gudul lurker is an ok card but shouldn&#8217;t evolving wilds be rated more highly because the rares in FR are so good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/draftcandy-2-dtk-draft-1/comment-page-1/#comment-228959</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2015 16:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=33586#comment-228959</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Awesome vids.  I very much like how you talk through the whys of your decisions, extremely insightful.  The academy might have unfortunately lost Marshall, but between you and Cribbs, I&#039;ll definitely be coming back for more.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome vids.  I very much like how you talk through the whys of your decisions, extremely insightful.  The academy might have unfortunately lost Marshall, but between you and Cribbs, I&#8217;ll definitely be coming back for more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/draftcandy-2-dtk-draft-1/comment-page-1/#comment-228680</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2015 06:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=33586#comment-228680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello,

thanks for the vids. Can you elaborate what you consider the biggest difference (tempo, priorities, style, etc.) between Khans/Fate and this format? Thanks!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>thanks for the vids. Can you elaborate what you consider the biggest difference (tempo, priorities, style, etc.) between Khans/Fate and this format? Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NovaSandler</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/draftcandy-2-dtk-draft-1/comment-page-1/#comment-228627</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NovaSandler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2015 22:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=33586#comment-228627</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think Reduce is fine and was the correct pick over Silumgar&#039;s Scorn.  It was a mental error that I didn&#039;t consider it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Reduce is fine and was the correct pick over Silumgar&#8217;s Scorn.  It was a mental error that I didn&#8217;t consider it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noobeman</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/draftcandy-2-dtk-draft-1/comment-page-1/#comment-228553</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Noobeman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2015 17:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=33586#comment-228553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello Noah,

Can you please elaborate on why you think Reduce in Stature is bad? If I were drafting, I would definitely pick and play it, so I was confused to see you barely even mention it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Noah,</p>
<p>Can you please elaborate on why you think Reduce in Stature is bad? If I were drafting, I would definitely pick and play it, so I was confused to see you barely even mention it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
