<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Focus on the Pro Tour: The New Extended (and Some Newly Found Scars)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/focus-on-the-pro-tour-the-new-extended-and-some-newly-found-scars/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/focus-on-the-pro-tour-the-new-extended-and-some-newly-found-scars/</link>
	<description>The prime source for Magic the Gathering strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2017 22:21:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carmen</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/focus-on-the-pro-tour-the-new-extended-and-some-newly-found-scars/comment-page-1/#comment-72328</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carmen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2013 23:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=9334#comment-72328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Best of luck!I really hope you are able to tlcake this series, provide the numerous MTGOers out there in your same shoes with a sense of shared experience (valuable in overcoming the frustration) *and* meet your goals.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Best of luck!I really hope you are able to tlcake this series, provide the numerous MTGOers out there in your same shoes with a sense of shared experience (valuable in overcoming the frustration) *and* meet your goals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: juggernaut1002</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/focus-on-the-pro-tour-the-new-extended-and-some-newly-found-scars/comment-page-1/#comment-2732</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[juggernaut1002]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 17:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=9334#comment-2732</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[T1 - Memnite, Orinthopter, Mox, plains, Steel Overseer.  Seems good.

Elspeth looks ridiculous.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>T1 &#8211; Memnite, Orinthopter, Mox, plains, Steel Overseer.  Seems good.</p>
<p>Elspeth looks ridiculous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KillerOwen</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/focus-on-the-pro-tour-the-new-extended-and-some-newly-found-scars/comment-page-1/#comment-2713</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KillerOwen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 22:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=9334#comment-2713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ Cody: The Vintage decks I play don&#039;t run any chrome since they are week compared to the power, and I never use any artifact lands unless I&#039;m running like Tezz. Mox might be a 1 of but I wouldn&#039;t be going crazy for it. In Vintage you want to play your artifacts and be able to use them right away Opal won&#039;t guarantee that. I expect some decks to run it especial decks like MUD, but I will hold off for now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Cody: The Vintage decks I play don&#8217;t run any chrome since they are week compared to the power, and I never use any artifact lands unless I&#8217;m running like Tezz. Mox might be a 1 of but I wouldn&#8217;t be going crazy for it. In Vintage you want to play your artifacts and be able to use them right away Opal won&#8217;t guarantee that. I expect some decks to run it especial decks like MUD, but I will hold off for now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neros</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/focus-on-the-pro-tour-the-new-extended-and-some-newly-found-scars/comment-page-1/#comment-2712</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neros]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 21:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=9334#comment-2712</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you so much for the spoilers. Look seeing the text with a picture of it as well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you so much for the spoilers. Look seeing the text with a picture of it as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cody</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/focus-on-the-pro-tour-the-new-extended-and-some-newly-found-scars/comment-page-1/#comment-2711</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cody]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 19:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=9334#comment-2711</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@KillerOwen Mox derp counts itself for the metalcraft activation, so you really only need two other artifacts. Between having a few artifact lands, playing the original moxen and possibly diamond or chrome, lotus, sol ring and perhaps a few other cheap artifacts, it seems it could be cast with relative ease. The fact that it&#039;s legendary is just lazy design though.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@KillerOwen Mox derp counts itself for the metalcraft activation, so you really only need two other artifacts. Between having a few artifact lands, playing the original moxen and possibly diamond or chrome, lotus, sol ring and perhaps a few other cheap artifacts, it seems it could be cast with relative ease. The fact that it&#8217;s legendary is just lazy design though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KillerOwen</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/focus-on-the-pro-tour-the-new-extended-and-some-newly-found-scars/comment-page-1/#comment-2710</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KillerOwen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 18:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=9334#comment-2710</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Venser and Elspeth will definitely be awesome cards, but as for the mox I&#039;m not sure it&#039;ll be Vintage playable. I have played plenty of Vintage games where I didn&#039;t have 3 mox or arties out on the battlefield making the mox a dead card. It&#039;ll definitely be good in an affinity deck though. If it wasn&#039;t Legendary I would consider using it in Vintage since 4 of those + 5 mox + lotus + petal = at least 11 artifacts a good chance of getting 3, but sadly its not :( oh well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Venser and Elspeth will definitely be awesome cards, but as for the mox I&#8217;m not sure it&#8217;ll be Vintage playable. I have played plenty of Vintage games where I didn&#8217;t have 3 mox or arties out on the battlefield making the mox a dead card. It&#8217;ll definitely be good in an affinity deck though. If it wasn&#8217;t Legendary I would consider using it in Vintage since 4 of those + 5 mox + lotus + petal = at least 11 artifacts a good chance of getting 3, but sadly its not <img src="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif" alt=":(" class="wp-smiley" />  oh well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zage</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/focus-on-the-pro-tour-the-new-extended-and-some-newly-found-scars/comment-page-1/#comment-2709</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zage]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 18:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=9334#comment-2709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wonder how good a 0 mana 1/1 is. Probably not good enough, but it&#039;s very interesting that they&#039;re trying a 0-mana creature that&#039;s not 0/x.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder how good a 0 mana 1/1 is. Probably not good enough, but it&#8217;s very interesting that they&#8217;re trying a 0-mana creature that&#8217;s not 0/x.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
