<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Innistrad-Dark Ascension Prerelease Sealed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/innistrad-dark-ascension-prerelease-sealed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/innistrad-dark-ascension-prerelease-sealed/</link>
	<description>The prime source for Magic the Gathering strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2017 22:21:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/innistrad-dark-ascension-prerelease-sealed/comment-page-1/#comment-7589</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Henry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 04:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=15453#comment-7589</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Those pizza toppings sound like the ultimate recipe for bad breath.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those pizza toppings sound like the ultimate recipe for bad breath.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: knx</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/innistrad-dark-ascension-prerelease-sealed/comment-page-1/#comment-7584</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[knx]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=15453#comment-7584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[R1G3 : why not killblock the immerwolf with the 2/2 flasher, remove the 5/7 from combat (why on earth take the 4/4 there) and you can return the werewolves to wolves again next turn... think you might have missed a win there]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>R1G3 : why not killblock the immerwolf with the 2/2 flasher, remove the 5/7 from combat (why on earth take the 4/4 there) and you can return the werewolves to wolves again next turn&#8230; think you might have missed a win there</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sidereal</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/innistrad-dark-ascension-prerelease-sealed/comment-page-1/#comment-7549</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sidereal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 22:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=15453#comment-7549</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, Elbrus is pretty weak, but he also can&#039;t be blocked by a 1/1 flier as suggested early on.  More likely to be Victim of Nighted or Smight the Monstroused after all the work setting him up.

It was a weakish pool, but not the worst.  It did have good mill synergy.  Looking at a Champion of the Parish and an Into the Maw that you can&#039;t even play is why I don&#039;t like Sealed.  In my first sealed event for the new set I had to send a Huntmaster of the Fells straight to the unplayable pile.  Lame.

I have no idea why so many people windmill-reject Intangible Virtue, even in decks where it&#039;s good.  I promise that there are cards in a typical sealed deck doing much worse than giving all of your spirit and zombie tokens +1/+1.  Not saying it was great for your pool, but it&#039;s always worth a look.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Elbrus is pretty weak, but he also can&#8217;t be blocked by a 1/1 flier as suggested early on.  More likely to be Victim of Nighted or Smight the Monstroused after all the work setting him up.</p>
<p>It was a weakish pool, but not the worst.  It did have good mill synergy.  Looking at a Champion of the Parish and an Into the Maw that you can&#8217;t even play is why I don&#8217;t like Sealed.  In my first sealed event for the new set I had to send a Huntmaster of the Fells straight to the unplayable pile.  Lame.</p>
<p>I have no idea why so many people windmill-reject Intangible Virtue, even in decks where it&#8217;s good.  I promise that there are cards in a typical sealed deck doing much worse than giving all of your spirit and zombie tokens +1/+1.  Not saying it was great for your pool, but it&#8217;s always worth a look.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: geo</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/innistrad-dark-ascension-prerelease-sealed/comment-page-1/#comment-7533</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[geo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 16:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=15453#comment-7533</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I totally agree, I played in a sealed, and my pool was terrible.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree, I played in a sealed, and my pool was terrible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PlanetWalls</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/innistrad-dark-ascension-prerelease-sealed/comment-page-1/#comment-7524</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PlanetWalls]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 07:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=15453#comment-7524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Physics, I actually like your build quite a bit, but I might play an extra Plains and cut an Island.  I especially like how it makes use of the Scarecrows and Ghostly Possession more effectively than my build did.  I would like to test out Chill of Foreboding to see how effective it is.  Five is not very good as far as milling goes, and the flashback is pretty expensive.  It&#039;s an interesting situational spell.

Glad you liked the pointless mindgame against that guy.  I worked pretty hard on something that probably didn&#039;t matter anyway because the opponent likely had his face caught in a bag of Doritos and couldn&#039;t see the screen.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Physics, I actually like your build quite a bit, but I might play an extra Plains and cut an Island.  I especially like how it makes use of the Scarecrows and Ghostly Possession more effectively than my build did.  I would like to test out Chill of Foreboding to see how effective it is.  Five is not very good as far as milling goes, and the flashback is pretty expensive.  It&#8217;s an interesting situational spell.</p>
<p>Glad you liked the pointless mindgame against that guy.  I worked pretty hard on something that probably didn&#8217;t matter anyway because the opponent likely had his face caught in a bag of Doritos and couldn&#8217;t see the screen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Physics</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/innistrad-dark-ascension-prerelease-sealed/comment-page-1/#comment-7522</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Physics]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 03:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=15453#comment-7522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While I echo the sentiment above that this is quite a weak pool overall, I believe U/W &quot;All-in&quot; mill has the best chance to get there.
White*6
1 Mausoleum Guard
1 Hollowhenge Spirit
1 Elgaud Inquisitor
1 Voiceless Spirit
1 Midnight Guard
1 Ghostly Possession
Blue *12
1 Increasing Confusion
1 Geralfs Mindcrusher
1 Skaab Goliath
1 Soul Seizer
1 Nephalia Seakite
1 Claustrophobia
1 Lantern Spirit
1 Divination
1 Chill of Foreboding
1 Chant of the Skifsang
1 Thought Scour
1 Sensory Deprivation
artifact*5
1 Ghoulcallers Bell
1 Blazing Torch
1 Butcher&#039;s Cleaver
2 One-Eyed Scarecrow

The idea here is that you you combine mill with self mill (through bell and chill of foreboding and thought scour) that you can consistently find your increasing confusion if you dont draw it. You have reasonable &#039;removal&#039; in a mill type deck with chant, sensory dep, torch, claustrophopia, and ghostly possession. Your one-eyed scarecrows would be helpful against your opponents nonexistant fliers, and perhaps more importantly random stuff like immerwolf. Overall you get reasonable blockers and tricks with your white 4 drops, and reasonable win cons if mill fails with cleaver and goliath. Thoughts?

Also: loved the &#039;oops I forgot to play claustrophobia precombat just kidding play Ill blow you out with a combat trick play&#039;. Was the most educational moment for me of the series.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I echo the sentiment above that this is quite a weak pool overall, I believe U/W &#8220;All-in&#8221; mill has the best chance to get there.<br />
White*6<br />
1 Mausoleum Guard<br />
1 Hollowhenge Spirit<br />
1 Elgaud Inquisitor<br />
1 Voiceless Spirit<br />
1 Midnight Guard<br />
1 Ghostly Possession<br />
Blue *12<br />
1 Increasing Confusion<br />
1 Geralfs Mindcrusher<br />
1 Skaab Goliath<br />
1 Soul Seizer<br />
1 Nephalia Seakite<br />
1 Claustrophobia<br />
1 Lantern Spirit<br />
1 Divination<br />
1 Chill of Foreboding<br />
1 Chant of the Skifsang<br />
1 Thought Scour<br />
1 Sensory Deprivation<br />
artifact*5<br />
1 Ghoulcallers Bell<br />
1 Blazing Torch<br />
1 Butcher&#8217;s Cleaver<br />
2 One-Eyed Scarecrow</p>
<p>The idea here is that you you combine mill with self mill (through bell and chill of foreboding and thought scour) that you can consistently find your increasing confusion if you dont draw it. You have reasonable &#8216;removal&#8217; in a mill type deck with chant, sensory dep, torch, claustrophopia, and ghostly possession. Your one-eyed scarecrows would be helpful against your opponents nonexistant fliers, and perhaps more importantly random stuff like immerwolf. Overall you get reasonable blockers and tricks with your white 4 drops, and reasonable win cons if mill fails with cleaver and goliath. Thoughts?</p>
<p>Also: loved the &#8216;oops I forgot to play claustrophobia precombat just kidding play Ill blow you out with a combat trick play&#8217;. Was the most educational moment for me of the series.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/innistrad-dark-ascension-prerelease-sealed/comment-page-1/#comment-7519</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 22:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=15453#comment-7519</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your pool wasn&#039;t great, but I&#039;ve seen worse - your build wasn&#039;t awful and you were fairly rich in tempo and evasion (including that 7 mana equipment was a mistake). Your color greedy opponent&#039;s deck really came together in R1 and you could never get ahead to use your tempo effectively. R2 should have been yours if not for play mistakes. R3 Your opponent&#039;s deck was awful, but you still almost threw away G1 by not using sensory dep aggessively enough. R4 your opponents draws seemed mediocre and he made some play mistakes - not sure your deck was better as RW, but it won you 1 pack so... woot?

Lo, a 2-2 finish. Could have been a 3-1, but at least you learned something about the format.

As far as Increasing Confusion goes:
By no means is it fireball. It is a very different card. I don&#039;t have a problem with it in this deck at all. Mainly because it gives you the old &quot;orthogonal&quot; victory condition at the very low cost of one card slot. Even if someone is milling *you* it gives you a chance to counter-mill them back, no matter how many horned turntles and rats they try and hide behind. Are their some matchups where it should come out? Of course. Are you sometimes going to kick yourself when you draw it? Yes. But it also has the ability to win otherwise unwinnable games.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your pool wasn&#8217;t great, but I&#8217;ve seen worse &#8211; your build wasn&#8217;t awful and you were fairly rich in tempo and evasion (including that 7 mana equipment was a mistake). Your color greedy opponent&#8217;s deck really came together in R1 and you could never get ahead to use your tempo effectively. R2 should have been yours if not for play mistakes. R3 Your opponent&#8217;s deck was awful, but you still almost threw away G1 by not using sensory dep aggessively enough. R4 your opponents draws seemed mediocre and he made some play mistakes &#8211; not sure your deck was better as RW, but it won you 1 pack so&#8230; woot?</p>
<p>Lo, a 2-2 finish. Could have been a 3-1, but at least you learned something about the format.</p>
<p>As far as Increasing Confusion goes:<br />
By no means is it fireball. It is a very different card. I don&#8217;t have a problem with it in this deck at all. Mainly because it gives you the old &#8220;orthogonal&#8221; victory condition at the very low cost of one card slot. Even if someone is milling *you* it gives you a chance to counter-mill them back, no matter how many horned turntles and rats they try and hide behind. Are their some matchups where it should come out? Of course. Are you sometimes going to kick yourself when you draw it? Yes. But it also has the ability to win otherwise unwinnable games.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
