<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Keeping it Casual: EDH Bad Romance Dragons</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/keeping-it-casual-edh-bad-romance-dragons/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/keeping-it-casual-edh-bad-romance-dragons/</link>
	<description>The prime source for Magic the Gathering strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2017 22:21:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ACP</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/keeping-it-casual-edh-bad-romance-dragons/comment-page-1/#comment-2720</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ACP]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 13:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=9212#comment-2720</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow some bad play. Were your drunk or just drunk on table crushing?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow some bad play. Were your drunk or just drunk on table crushing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ShardFenix</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/keeping-it-casual-edh-bad-romance-dragons/comment-page-1/#comment-2669</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShardFenix]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 01:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=9212#comment-2669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As far as the Teeg deck, it&#039;s my favorite as far as flavorwise and some of the cards in it.  Unfortunately its also possibly the worst though I think it could be fun to use a deck like that.  The Teeg deck is my second most recent deck, so it is still very very fresh and probably needs a lot of tweaking.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as the Teeg deck, it&#8217;s my favorite as far as flavorwise and some of the cards in it.  Unfortunately its also possibly the worst though I think it could be fun to use a deck like that.  The Teeg deck is my second most recent deck, so it is still very very fresh and probably needs a lot of tweaking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ShardFenix</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/keeping-it-casual-edh-bad-romance-dragons/comment-page-1/#comment-2668</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShardFenix]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 01:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=9212#comment-2668</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So far i havent had any issues mana-wise.  37 is on the lighter side i think but im also a slightly riskier player.  I just finished building an Intet, the Dreamer deck today which runs 40 lands and about 5ish mana sources and honestly it could probably drop a land.  A lot of the numbers in correct land counts for Commander depends on risk/reward and what you can play comfortably with.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So far i havent had any issues mana-wise.  37 is on the lighter side i think but im also a slightly riskier player.  I just finished building an Intet, the Dreamer deck today which runs 40 lands and about 5ish mana sources and honestly it could probably drop a land.  A lot of the numbers in correct land counts for Commander depends on risk/reward and what you can play comfortably with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordanxn</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/keeping-it-casual-edh-bad-romance-dragons/comment-page-1/#comment-2665</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jordanxn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 00:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=9212#comment-2665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I vote Teeg for the next deck. G/W Prison sounds interesting.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I vote Teeg for the next deck. G/W Prison sounds interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nathones</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/keeping-it-casual-edh-bad-romance-dragons/comment-page-1/#comment-2664</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nathones]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 23:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=9212#comment-2664</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like Karrthus.  My only problem with your build is I don&#039;t believe it plays enough mana sources.  37 lands with about 8 mana accel doesn&#039;t seem consistent enough to me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Karrthus.  My only problem with your build is I don&#8217;t believe it plays enough mana sources.  37 lands with about 8 mana accel doesn&#8217;t seem consistent enough to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Travis R. Chance</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/keeping-it-casual-edh-bad-romance-dragons/comment-page-1/#comment-2660</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Travis R. Chance]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 17:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=9212#comment-2660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What about my fav multi-player dragon: [card]Taurean Mauler[/card]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about my fav multi-player dragon: <a href="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/wp-content/plugins/mtgo-wp-mtg-helper/mtg_helper_cardfinder.php?find=Taurean+Mauler&width=223&height=310" class="jTip" name="Taurean Mauler">Taurean Mauler</a><img src='http://gatherer.wizards.com/Handlers/Image.ashx?size=small&type=card&name=Taurean Mauler&options=' style='display:none;width:1px;height:1px;' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Plejades</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/keeping-it-casual-edh-bad-romance-dragons/comment-page-1/#comment-2658</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Plejades]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 10:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=9212#comment-2658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice article/video. I like the setup where a video decktech and game is supported by written information and a decklist. Dragons are a big favorite of many casual players and this will hopefully give some incentives to try out a new format for some of them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article/video. I like the setup where a video decktech and game is supported by written information and a decklist. Dragons are a big favorite of many casual players and this will hopefully give some incentives to try out a new format for some of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
