And Fluxx, you post up that RtR video, I’ll be first in line to watch it.

First of all to Chris, since it is the strongest and most direct.
If I didnt care about this show or website I wouldnt have commented, giving negative feedback is not being a ‘jerk’, there is only so much room to give positive feedback in a simple reply. Anonomity is an old argument, but non-relevant. I have been using this handle for 14 years now everywhere on the internet (or Fluxje), and will be using this handle for all the years to come.
In fact I used the ‘fluxje’ handle for my youtube channel, I have been a commentator myself in the past for SCBW about 4 years ago. Not only that but I will take you up on your offer, and make a RTR draft video next week.

Now for the content itself:
The biggest problem lies in you two dualcasting. For a dualcast to be succesfull, you need to adherit to ONE very important rule. There has to be a host, and a guest (even if that gues always returns). Talkshows and debates are setup like this for a reason.

The host is there to direct the draft, the conversations, and have the strength of will to cut the conversation when needed. The guest is there to give insight, feedback, or a fresh perspective.
Right now you two dont supplement eachother, nor do you guys bring out good debates.

The best example is the start of the Tempest draft. You guys overlook half the pack, including the rare. The rare in fact is a complete bomb in limited. Rolling thunder might be the pick still over coffer queen, but at least discuss it. Same goes with p2-5, and the evaluation of the cards.

Now eating is a complete nogo. If you want to eat, do it during intermissions, or one of you walk away to get a quick bite.
Bubsy made a perfect example what is wrong with this series, and the series you guys brought out before. I can faintly remember a SoM/NP draft where a woman accompanied you. The only thing that stuck with me about that draft was it contained an orgy of voices, and me turning it off after 7 minutes.

I would like to say, though, that there was some legitimacy to Fluxx’s statement. I appreciate the defense, but it’s really not necessary. These comments are here for people to sound off in any (appropriate) way they want.

I enjoy and appreciate the content you bring to the game. Thanks for taking the time to record and produce the videos.

And Fluxx,

Here’s a link to BBExpress, a free video recorder: http://www.bbsoftware.co.uk/
And here’s a link to Audacity, a free audio recorder: audacity.sourceforge.net/
And finally, here’s a place to put your videos up for free: http://www.youtube.com

So, if you think you can do it better, put up or shut up. Constructive criticism is one thing, but being a jerk because of anonymity is another. But maybe if you complain loud enough, they’ll refund the money you paid to get this content.

-Chris
Host, Pauper to the People
MTGCast.com

“So we’re taking the Pacifism?” “Gallantry is also good, it’s like a Pacifism but you get to draw a card *smack, smack*” “Uhh, kind of.”

“Lowland Giant?” “I like dudes!” “Yeah, me too!” “Am I right in thinking that {Random card} is a removal spell?” “It’s kind of a removal spell.” “I think we should take it, ha!”

Figure out what your deck needs, then draft accordingly. Stop being different just to be different.