<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Limited Resources: BTT Draft #4</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-btt-draft-4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-btt-draft-4/</link>
	<description>The prime source for Magic the Gathering strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2017 22:21:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy LeHomme</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-btt-draft-4/comment-page-1/#comment-87112</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guy LeHomme]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2014 03:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=28411#comment-87112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Also, is there a reason why Na&#039;vi Jake is advertising 20% off MTG Madness?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, is there a reason why Na&#8217;vi Jake is advertising 20% off MTG Madness?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy LeHomme</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-btt-draft-4/comment-page-1/#comment-87111</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guy LeHomme]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2014 03:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=28411#comment-87111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The odds of the last opponent having Pinnacle of Rage and attacking for exact damage in that particular situation was WAY more unlikely than Marshall having 1 of 3 single blue responses for the cure, of which Marshall didn&#039;t get full value anyway.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The odds of the last opponent having Pinnacle of Rage and attacking for exact damage in that particular situation was WAY more unlikely than Marshall having 1 of 3 single blue responses for the cure, of which Marshall didn&#8217;t get full value anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-btt-draft-4/comment-page-1/#comment-86920</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[alex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2014 22:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=28411#comment-86920</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Plus he himself had 2 cards that could be described as &quot;the only thing you could have!!~&quot; in Drown in Sorrow and Pinnacle of Rage, both of which are uncommon while Retraction Helix is common. And 2 Pharika&#039;s Cure. He definitely got luckier than Marshall in those games.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Plus he himself had 2 cards that could be described as &#8220;the only thing you could have!!~&#8221; in Drown in Sorrow and Pinnacle of Rage, both of which are uncommon while Retraction Helix is common. And 2 Pharika&#8217;s Cure. He definitely got luckier than Marshall in those games.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prehemencie</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-btt-draft-4/comment-page-1/#comment-86775</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Prehemencie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2014 20:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=28411#comment-86775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Salty and quite wrong, there was also lost in a labyrinth and Triton tactics.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Salty and quite wrong, there was also lost in a labyrinth and Triton tactics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dudester</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-btt-draft-4/comment-page-1/#comment-86753</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dudester]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2014 15:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=28411#comment-86753</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What a salty dude on Game 3. I don&#039;t understand how magic players can complain when their opponent has an answer to their spells; that&#039;s what the game is all about.

I was also surprised Nyx smith didn&#039;t get a mention. Did work for me every time i used it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a salty dude on Game 3. I don&#8217;t understand how magic players can complain when their opponent has an answer to their spells; that&#8217;s what the game is all about.</p>
<p>I was also surprised Nyx smith didn&#8217;t get a mention. Did work for me every time i used it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nice Videos</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-btt-draft-4/comment-page-1/#comment-86569</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nice Videos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2014 00:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=28411#comment-86569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marshall, love the videos, please keep them coming. Wondering on your take on this. Do you think it would have been correct to take some more 2 drops? I didn&#039;t write down the decisions, but I know there were some picks pack 3 before the battlewise hoplite wheeled where you had an opportunity to take some 2 drops (I think snarecatcher and priest), but you took some more powerful cards at higher costs instead. It seemed to me your deck&#039;s largest weakness was a lack of tempo, and even though you had some sweet cards, the sweet expensive removal in black and red allowed your first and third round opponents to get a jump on you. Do you think just developing tempo in W/U with more low drops would have given you a better opportunity to win? Do you think we could extract this and say more broadly for W/U in this block, two drops are key?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marshall, love the videos, please keep them coming. Wondering on your take on this. Do you think it would have been correct to take some more 2 drops? I didn&#8217;t write down the decisions, but I know there were some picks pack 3 before the battlewise hoplite wheeled where you had an opportunity to take some 2 drops (I think snarecatcher and priest), but you took some more powerful cards at higher costs instead. It seemed to me your deck&#8217;s largest weakness was a lack of tempo, and even though you had some sweet cards, the sweet expensive removal in black and red allowed your first and third round opponents to get a jump on you. Do you think just developing tempo in W/U with more low drops would have given you a better opportunity to win? Do you think we could extract this and say more broadly for W/U in this block, two drops are key?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fuck intros</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-btt-draft-4/comment-page-1/#comment-86563</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fuck intros]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 22:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=28411#comment-86563</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WHO the fuck is pixxel my ass? these introductions suck]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WHO the fuck is pixxel my ass? these introductions suck</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
