<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Limited Resources: Gatecrash Draft #5</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-gatecrash-draft-5/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-gatecrash-draft-5/</link>
	<description>The prime source for Magic the Gathering strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2017 22:21:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apricio</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-gatecrash-draft-5/comment-page-1/#comment-34616</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Apricio]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 01:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=22531#comment-34616</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with your assertion  knight watch after testing it out my own  vigilince in this format is way better than any other in recent memory.

+2+2 spell:  I feel the only time thats going to be cast is when alpha-ing with the team.  Im comparing it to mark with death in sense that it gives your team evasion.  But without the double ww mana restriction.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with your assertion  knight watch after testing it out my own  vigilince in this format is way better than any other in recent memory.</p>
<p>+2+2 spell:  I feel the only time thats going to be cast is when alpha-ing with the team.  Im comparing it to mark with death in sense that it gives your team evasion.  But without the double ww mana restriction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ijuhgy</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-gatecrash-draft-5/comment-page-1/#comment-34561</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ijuhgy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 23:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=22531#comment-34561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You need 20 red and green creatures before picking it?

Not sure if you understanding drafting, the GTC format, or MtG in general...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You need 20 red and green creatures before picking it?</p>
<p>Not sure if you understanding drafting, the GTC format, or MtG in general&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zj</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-gatecrash-draft-5/comment-page-1/#comment-34383</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[zj]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 18:32:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=22531#comment-34383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think match 2&#039;s confusion is just the opponent misclicking or just plain bad play... funny to see marshall get really confused by opponents not playing as perfectly as he does.

@lame, gruul charm wins games if you are in gruul, but it is definitely not p1p1. you need 20 red and green creatures before picking it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think match 2&#8242;s confusion is just the opponent misclicking or just plain bad play&#8230; funny to see marshall get really confused by opponents not playing as perfectly as he does.</p>
<p>@lame, gruul charm wins games if you are in gruul, but it is definitely not p1p1. you need 20 red and green creatures before picking it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Owin Turdlewold</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-gatecrash-draft-5/comment-page-1/#comment-34156</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Owin Turdlewold]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 10:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=22531#comment-34156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Look who camed off down from he&#039;s high horse!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look who camed off down from he&#8217;s high horse!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Limited Resources</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-gatecrash-draft-5/comment-page-1/#comment-33909</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Limited Resources]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 01:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=22531#comment-33909</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@apricio I like having the one Knight Watch over the 2nd Scorchwalker quite a bit. I am running 17 lands with this deck and getting to 5 mana is not hard at all. 2 2/2 knights with vigilance is a lot more versatile than a 5/1. I have no issue with the +2+2 spell you mentioned, and I can&#039;t figure out why you think that card is comparable to Mark for Death in any reasonable way. 

I don&#039;t like Hellraiser Goblin very much, and prefer to start it in the sideboard and bring it in where it&#039;s really good. I definitely don&#039;t agree that the card is &quot;nuts&quot;. 

@Fluxx I think calling my mulligans &quot;very loose&quot; in that last match is a bit strong. I don&#039;t even agree with the one you brought up. Sure, I can cast 2 Skinbrand Goblins, not the worst ever but pretty close. Any white or red/white spell I draw is dead until I hit at least one plains and even then I have a double-white spell in hand. The hand I ended up keeping is not relevant to the decision you referenced. You have to remember to separate out the decisions based on what we knew at the time. I decided to mulligan that first hand based on the contents of the hand, not based on what I drew in my following hand. I think it&#039;s close, I could have kept but decided not to this time.

@ownage77 Thanks, I liked it too :)

@s2 I don&#039;t remember the exact situation,but yes you are right that if I had Act of Treason&#039;d his guy it would have been smaller for me than for him. Good call, I wish I could have made it relevant on the video :)

@capntopdeck Ah yeah you are correct, thanks for pointing it out.

@frizzell66 I find that people often don&#039;t play enough lands, and I feel like curving out with this deck is important enough to warrant 17. I&#039;m sure I could have gotten away with 16 here, but generally I prefer to err on the side of too many lands, rather than not enough.

About how many drafts I&#039;ve done, I have done 47 of them online, plus however many live, probably like 20?

@neil Ha that was unintentional, but cool :)

@asmodan correct, thanks for pointing it out 

@billthecat I usually just ignore, it&#039;s easier that way :) (good comment though)

@cheftony No, Gruul Charm does not get any love P1P1, it&#039;s not even on the radar.

@someoneorother but owls bring knowledge and feathers

@jim Couldn&#039;t agree more Jim. I play my style, and even if it doesn&#039;t match every viewers, they can join me on my mini-journey and see if we both can&#039;t learn something from it. Baffles me too man.

@jim not sure what happened here lol]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@apricio I like having the one Knight Watch over the 2nd Scorchwalker quite a bit. I am running 17 lands with this deck and getting to 5 mana is not hard at all. 2 2/2 knights with vigilance is a lot more versatile than a 5/1. I have no issue with the +2+2 spell you mentioned, and I can&#8217;t figure out why you think that card is comparable to Mark for Death in any reasonable way. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t like Hellraiser Goblin very much, and prefer to start it in the sideboard and bring it in where it&#8217;s really good. I definitely don&#8217;t agree that the card is &#8220;nuts&#8221;. </p>
<p>@Fluxx I think calling my mulligans &#8220;very loose&#8221; in that last match is a bit strong. I don&#8217;t even agree with the one you brought up. Sure, I can cast 2 Skinbrand Goblins, not the worst ever but pretty close. Any white or red/white spell I draw is dead until I hit at least one plains and even then I have a double-white spell in hand. The hand I ended up keeping is not relevant to the decision you referenced. You have to remember to separate out the decisions based on what we knew at the time. I decided to mulligan that first hand based on the contents of the hand, not based on what I drew in my following hand. I think it&#8217;s close, I could have kept but decided not to this time.</p>
<p>@ownage77 Thanks, I liked it too <img src="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" class="wp-smiley" /> </p>
<p>@s2 I don&#8217;t remember the exact situation,but yes you are right that if I had Act of Treason&#8217;d his guy it would have been smaller for me than for him. Good call, I wish I could have made it relevant on the video <img src="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" class="wp-smiley" /> </p>
<p>@capntopdeck Ah yeah you are correct, thanks for pointing it out.</p>
<p>@frizzell66 I find that people often don&#8217;t play enough lands, and I feel like curving out with this deck is important enough to warrant 17. I&#8217;m sure I could have gotten away with 16 here, but generally I prefer to err on the side of too many lands, rather than not enough.</p>
<p>About how many drafts I&#8217;ve done, I have done 47 of them online, plus however many live, probably like 20?</p>
<p>@neil Ha that was unintentional, but cool <img src="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" class="wp-smiley" /> </p>
<p>@asmodan correct, thanks for pointing it out </p>
<p>@billthecat I usually just ignore, it&#8217;s easier that way <img src="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" class="wp-smiley" />  (good comment though)</p>
<p>@cheftony No, Gruul Charm does not get any love P1P1, it&#8217;s not even on the radar.</p>
<p>@someoneorother but owls bring knowledge and feathers</p>
<p>@jim Couldn&#8217;t agree more Jim. I play my style, and even if it doesn&#8217;t match every viewers, they can join me on my mini-journey and see if we both can&#8217;t learn something from it. Baffles me too man.</p>
<p>@jim not sure what happened here lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: @ Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-gatecrash-draft-5/comment-page-1/#comment-33347</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[@ Jim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 06:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=22531#comment-33347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[*don&#039;t *I *Marshall *don&#039;t *Travis *Woo *I *I *I]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*don&#8217;t *I *Marshall *don&#8217;t *Travis *Woo *I *I *I</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-gatecrash-draft-5/comment-page-1/#comment-33242</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 01:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=22531#comment-33242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hate it when people dont watch the whole thing because they disagree with an early pick. I have learnt a lot from watching people with different play styles from mine, i draft like marshall so dont often get it here, but travis woo often makes picks and decks i cringe at then i love watching the wins he takes and i learn from it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate it when people dont watch the whole thing because they disagree with an early pick. I have learnt a lot from watching people with different play styles from mine, i draft like marshall so dont often get it here, but travis woo often makes picks and decks i cringe at then i love watching the wins he takes and i learn from it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
