Comments on: Limited Resources: Innistrad Draft #4

By: Feldmarschal

Feldmarschal — Fri, 18 Nov 2011 22:21:01 +0000

Very thankfull for such kind of videos! Learning a lot from you guys, just keep going

By: SteveS

SteveS — Tue, 15 Nov 2011 21:12:43 +0000

Also, it’s worth pointing out that your deck ends up with something like a half-dozen targets for Ghoulraiser, and when you saw the first one you knew that it probably would – given that most of the good blue creatures (Skaab, Mauler, Stitched Drake) are Zombies, either Ghoulraiser will be pretty decent or your deck will likely be horrible anyway. You couldn’t _know_ that you were going to pick up multiple Skaabs, but it was actually pretty likely.

By: SteveS

SteveS — Tue, 15 Nov 2011 20:48:55 +0000

I was surprised to hear you guys not even mention Runechanter’s Pike in pack 1, pick 3. The packs weren’t great for the plan, as it turns out, but in the blue decks particularly it’s typically at least +2/+0 and first strike, and sometimes it just goes huge. It might not be the pick over Interloper but it’s at least in the discussion.

By: cubic feat

cubic feat — Tue, 15 Nov 2011 03:33:42 +0000

FINALLY some Loucks!

I’ve been waiting forever for a vid featuring LR proper, and man did this ever deliver! The more discussion the better! Also, Loucks you are god damn funny.

It’s crabberin’ time.

By: Jules Verne

Jules Verne — Tue, 15 Nov 2011 00:55:12 +0000

Because of the nature of how you convey stuff – good conversations around individual cards and all the other stuff that belongs to a draft-format/block: I really think your style is better served with Retro-Comment draft Vids, which you did some of earlier. Live Vids put such a stress-factor on both game-play (25 mts clock) and the conversation around it (which really is the “show of the show”). Its like we “only get 80 percent” of your capabilities in both those areas when you try combine both at same time.

Looking at the game-play factor alone, which IS the most fundamental part of MtG play, you know how stupidly relevant even the smallest things can be – and keeping that area 99.99 percent happy(noone is perfect) must be pretty darn hard when you are an extra guy participating in conversation.

Yes Ive seen some of Simon Goertzens draft vids and think he runs pretty good monologues, but his(and LSVs, PVs, CWoods*s) vids do still NOT beat the draft-vids were used to from LimResources, also the live ones.But as I said I just think your style is better served with Retro-Drafts.

But, Keep em comming (no matter what kind of vids they are) =).

By: Juzaba

Juzaba — Mon, 14 Nov 2011 21:30:11 +0000

I wish we had been able to hear your conversation about whether or not to play following Round One. There’s no downside to running the tape a bit longer and talking it out, and any recap in Round Two eats away your time. Besides, it’s much more interesting to see the decision process in action than to just hear the justification afterwards.

By: Eldmore

Eldmore — Sat, 12 Nov 2011 17:25:04 +0000

Evil Twin suicide was the most awesome tech play I’ve seen in a while.
There was a bit too much discussion for my taste.