<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Limited Resources: M11 Sealed #1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-m11-sealed-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-m11-sealed-1/</link>
	<description>The prime source for Magic the Gathering strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2017 22:21:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared (Baalzamon)</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-m11-sealed-1/comment-page-1/#comment-2771</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jared (Baalzamon)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Sep 2010 04:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=8988#comment-2771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just watched this for first time (just pool and not games so far) and winced when I saw this pool. I would have gone another way though as when my pools bad I usually try and play aggro as that at least lets you apply pressure to punish your opponents bad/clunky draws. I&#039;d have gone BWr or BUr as the black gives plentiful two drops which you can support with expanses and if you play seer+vamp with double act of treason you actually gain access to some unconditional removal. Also I&#039;d say manic vandals fine as a maindeck splash here as he will almost always have a target in m11 sealed and you need the blowout potential (I&#039;d also play deathmark main here).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just watched this for first time (just pool and not games so far) and winced when I saw this pool. I would have gone another way though as when my pools bad I usually try and play aggro as that at least lets you apply pressure to punish your opponents bad/clunky draws. I&#8217;d have gone BWr or BUr as the black gives plentiful two drops which you can support with expanses and if you play seer+vamp with double act of treason you actually gain access to some unconditional removal. Also I&#8217;d say manic vandals fine as a maindeck splash here as he will almost always have a target in m11 sealed and you need the blowout potential (I&#8217;d also play deathmark main here).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LaoChe</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-m11-sealed-1/comment-page-1/#comment-2663</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LaoChe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 21:44:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=8988#comment-2663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ah, never mind. Stormtide Leviathan has crazy good defensive rules text.

Just some thoughts:
- I think, at the time of this sealed, you under-rate Solemn Offering/Naturalize. I think in every game you played, there was a viable target game 1, and it certainly should have been sideboarded in against those Whispersilk Cloak and r3 opponent decks.
- I suspect the mana base is wrong. By playing double-white cards and only 3 Plains, you were leaning entirely on your Cultivates and Terramorphics to get you to WW, but at the same time, you weren&#039;t then able to use your Cultivates to fix your Blue. I think you could have gotten away with a LOT less Green, and more W. Before you hit submit on your final mana base, i was thinking, 4/6/4, but now i think it&#039;s more like 5/6/4 and one fewer Terramorphic Expanse.  6 pieces of mana fixing in one deck is a LOT! The WW requirement off your fixing warps your decision-making in-game, and forced you to make awkward decisions like fetch double Plains in match 3. It also constricts your ability to play Blinding Mage + your WW bomb.

Of course, general commiseration on the extremely low quality of the card pool.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, never mind. Stormtide Leviathan has crazy good defensive rules text.</p>
<p>Just some thoughts:<br />
- I think, at the time of this sealed, you under-rate Solemn Offering/Naturalize. I think in every game you played, there was a viable target game 1, and it certainly should have been sideboarded in against those Whispersilk Cloak and r3 opponent decks.<br />
- I suspect the mana base is wrong. By playing double-white cards and only 3 Plains, you were leaning entirely on your Cultivates and Terramorphics to get you to WW, but at the same time, you weren&#8217;t then able to use your Cultivates to fix your Blue. I think you could have gotten away with a LOT less Green, and more W. Before you hit submit on your final mana base, i was thinking, 4/6/4, but now i think it&#8217;s more like 5/6/4 and one fewer Terramorphic Expanse.  6 pieces of mana fixing in one deck is a LOT! The WW requirement off your fixing warps your decision-making in-game, and forced you to make awkward decisions like fetch double Plains in match 3. It also constricts your ability to play Blinding Mage + your WW bomb.</p>
<p>Of course, general commiseration on the extremely low quality of the card pool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LaoChe</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-m11-sealed-1/comment-page-1/#comment-2661</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LaoChe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 20:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=8988#comment-2661</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Match 2, Game 1, why did you play a Ajani over Prized Unicorn? Doesn&#039;t the Unicorn just give you the win as long as you untap with it and Air Servant?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Match 2, Game 1, why did you play a Ajani over Prized Unicorn? Doesn&#8217;t the Unicorn just give you the win as long as you untap with it and Air Servant?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: starwarer</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-m11-sealed-1/comment-page-1/#comment-2481</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[starwarer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 17:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=8988#comment-2481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Match 2, I would have sided into a Merfolk package, with the Merfolk Spies and the Sovereign. Also the Excommunicates. Basically turn into a lean, mean aggro machine (against this opponent anyway).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Match 2, I would have sided into a Merfolk package, with the Merfolk Spies and the Sovereign. Also the Excommunicates. Basically turn into a lean, mean aggro machine (against this opponent anyway).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nathones</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-m11-sealed-1/comment-page-1/#comment-2471</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nathones]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 20:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=8988#comment-2471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would keep the siren in your deck.  She is quasi removal that you can throw into your fatties]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would keep the siren in your deck.  She is quasi removal that you can throw into your fatties</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HamDog</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-m11-sealed-1/comment-page-1/#comment-2465</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[HamDog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 02:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=8988#comment-2465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obviously I meant upkeep step!! But I guess it&#039;s true you&#039;re never going to play on your untap step either :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously I meant upkeep step!! But I guess it&#8217;s true you&#8217;re never going to play on your untap step either <img src="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" class="wp-smiley" /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HamDog</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-m11-sealed-1/comment-page-1/#comment-2464</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[HamDog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 01:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=8988#comment-2464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can I just say I&#039;m 100% with Marshall on the whole untap step stop thing. Especially in limited, there is just never a reason you&#039;re going to play anything on the untap step.  Just try it and you&#039;ll never go back!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can I just say I&#8217;m 100% with Marshall on the whole untap step stop thing. Especially in limited, there is just never a reason you&#8217;re going to play anything on the untap step.  Just try it and you&#8217;ll never go back!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
