<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Limited Resources: M12 Draft #5</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-m12-draft-5/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-m12-draft-5/</link>
	<description>The prime source for Magic the Gathering strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2017 22:21:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: vaarsuvius</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-m12-draft-5/comment-page-1/#comment-6075</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vaarsuvius]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 20:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=13809#comment-6075</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Marshall, for somebody with such analytical play style you surely suck at math  ;P   (hinting at the awkward overrun calculation.)   imho it should be clear it was enough, but if you don&#039;t see such things immediately at least don;t use the worst method possible  to work it out.

You added the + 3 to each creature individually out loud, then tried to add them up.  Instead start with: &quot;ok I have 10 (or 11) creatures, that is 30  (33) + 4+3+4+5+5+ etc etc]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Marshall, for somebody with such analytical play style you surely suck at math  ;P   (hinting at the awkward overrun calculation.)   imho it should be clear it was enough, but if you don&#8217;t see such things immediately at least don;t use the worst method possible  to work it out.</p>
<p>You added the + 3 to each creature individually out loud, then tried to add them up.  Instead start with: &#8220;ok I have 10 (or 11) creatures, that is 30  (33) + 4+3+4+5+5+ etc etc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marshall</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-m12-draft-5/comment-page-1/#comment-5978</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marshall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 17:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=13809#comment-5978</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the comments guys. 

Ya apparently passing that Spinner a few videos ago has caught up to me as I failed to recognize the &quot;at beginning of end step&quot; vs &quot;at end of turn&quot; thing. I am not sure how much it would have changed my line of play had I seen it, but I&#039;m sure it would have. 

@Disco - I like your logic there for sure. Especially on the already mana-intensive Arbalest Elite. I really like the Alabaster Mage in green decks since activating it once is pretty easy and can be 4+ life. 

@Steve - I agree, I saw it when I watched the video later and while the Wurm is a fine finisher vs an aggro deck, the trick is being alive at that point which usually means not holding 7-drops in hand all game :) 

@apricio - I can&#039;t remember the exact spot you are referring to but probably to diversify a bit, and for curve reasons.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comments guys. </p>
<p>Ya apparently passing that Spinner a few videos ago has caught up to me as I failed to recognize the &#8220;at beginning of end step&#8221; vs &#8220;at end of turn&#8221; thing. I am not sure how much it would have changed my line of play had I seen it, but I&#8217;m sure it would have. </p>
<p>@Disco &#8211; I like your logic there for sure. Especially on the already mana-intensive Arbalest Elite. I really like the Alabaster Mage in green decks since activating it once is pretty easy and can be 4+ life. </p>
<p>@Steve &#8211; I agree, I saw it when I watched the video later and while the Wurm is a fine finisher vs an aggro deck, the trick is being alive at that point which usually means not holding 7-drops in hand all game <img src="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" class="wp-smiley" />  </p>
<p>@apricio &#8211; I can&#8217;t remember the exact spot you are referring to but probably to diversify a bit, and for curve reasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: QuicksilverJohny</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-m12-draft-5/comment-page-1/#comment-5971</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[QuicksilverJohny]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 01:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=13809#comment-5971</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In match two, game 2: You could have been using Arachnus Spinner during his end step, allowing you to swing in and leave Spinner up.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In match two, game 2: You could have been using Arachnus Spinner during his end step, allowing you to swing in and leave Spinner up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: apricio</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-m12-draft-5/comment-page-1/#comment-5968</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[apricio]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 21:11:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=13809#comment-5968</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why did you take pegasus over a 3rd giant spider?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why did you take pegasus over a 3rd giant spider?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-m12-draft-5/comment-page-1/#comment-5967</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 18:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=13809#comment-5967</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Game 3 I would&#039;ve preferred taking out the 7 drop wurm over the 3 drop Benalish Veteran.  Otherwise a very nice draft, deck was pretty sweet.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Game 3 I would&#8217;ve preferred taking out the 7 drop wurm over the 3 drop Benalish Veteran.  Otherwise a very nice draft, deck was pretty sweet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Disco</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-m12-draft-5/comment-page-1/#comment-5965</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Disco]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 07:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=13809#comment-5965</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting decision on the last two cuts.

I definitely keep Hunter&#039;s Insight in due to double Cudgel Troll.  That combo is a pretty nasty beating as nobody ever blocks the first swing of a Troll.

However the last two cuts I make with your deck are Arbalest Elite and Alabaster Mage.  The reason has nothing to do with power level, as they&#039;re obviously better cards than some of the green guys- it&#039;s the fact that they are mana intensive as all get-out and rarely get activated in a fast format.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting decision on the last two cuts.</p>
<p>I definitely keep Hunter&#8217;s Insight in due to double Cudgel Troll.  That combo is a pretty nasty beating as nobody ever blocks the first swing of a Troll.</p>
<p>However the last two cuts I make with your deck are Arbalest Elite and Alabaster Mage.  The reason has nothing to do with power level, as they&#8217;re obviously better cards than some of the green guys- it&#8217;s the fact that they are mana intensive as all get-out and rarely get activated in a fast format.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vanwilder</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-m12-draft-5/comment-page-1/#comment-5964</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vanwilder]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 03:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=13809#comment-5964</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey, great vids

In game one, any thought to playing the angel making the stormfront indestructible so then you have the angel out and a great blocker?

I really dont like activating the spider on his turn on the angel, but i guess if you are that scared of a trick its good.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, great vids</p>
<p>In game one, any thought to playing the angel making the stormfront indestructible so then you have the angel out and a great blocker?</p>
<p>I really dont like activating the spider on his turn on the angel, but i guess if you are that scared of a trick its good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
