<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Limited Resources: Magic 2015 Draft #2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-magic-2015-draft-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-magic-2015-draft-2/</link>
	<description>The prime source for Magic the Gathering strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2017 22:21:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonah</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-magic-2015-draft-2/comment-page-1/#comment-181345</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2014 20:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=30798#comment-181345</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How do you pass Boonweaver Giant 3 times drafting an aura deck, with Burning Anger -- the second best Giant target -- already in your board? Yes, 7 is a lot of mana. But I&#039;ll pay 7 for a creature that basically taps to kill any reasonably sized creature or to deal 4 to my opponent&#039;s face!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you pass Boonweaver Giant 3 times drafting an aura deck, with Burning Anger &#8212; the second best Giant target &#8212; already in your board? Yes, 7 is a lot of mana. But I&#8217;ll pay 7 for a creature that basically taps to kill any reasonably sized creature or to deal 4 to my opponent&#8217;s face!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hascow</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-magic-2015-draft-2/comment-page-1/#comment-181020</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hascow]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2014 14:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=30798#comment-181020</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There may be an element of hindsight in it, but I was shocked when he went for the Plate Mail in the first place. I was expecting an Into the Void or just tapping down the opponent&#039;s creatures. Equipping and swinging didn&#039;t even occur to me, because there was just way too much that could go wrong.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There may be an element of hindsight in it, but I was shocked when he went for the Plate Mail in the first place. I was expecting an Into the Void or just tapping down the opponent&#8217;s creatures. Equipping and swinging didn&#8217;t even occur to me, because there was just way too much that could go wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Roads</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-magic-2015-draft-2/comment-page-1/#comment-180999</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam Roads]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2014 13:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=30798#comment-180999</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#039;s an element of hindsight in all the posters who call Marshall on the naturalised armour. Marshall took a view that a gamble with a big upside was preferable to a cautious, safer choice.

Plenty of football pundits blame the headcoach who goes for it on 4th down. Even when it fails, that doesn&#039;t make it a mistake.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s an element of hindsight in all the posters who call Marshall on the naturalised armour. Marshall took a view that a gamble with a big upside was preferable to a cautious, safer choice.</p>
<p>Plenty of football pundits blame the headcoach who goes for it on 4th down. Even when it fails, that doesn&#8217;t make it a mistake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-magic-2015-draft-2/comment-page-1/#comment-180824</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2014 20:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=30798#comment-180824</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[*weak*]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*weak*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-magic-2015-draft-2/comment-page-1/#comment-180823</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2014 20:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=30798#comment-180823</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I saw a green deck with 7 possible hunt the wreaks]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw a green deck with 7 possible hunt the wreaks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-magic-2015-draft-2/comment-page-1/#comment-180537</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2014 16:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=30798#comment-180537</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Sanctified Charges were really bad for this deck, with only 12 creatures it doesn&#039;t do much good. This deck was going to get beat by a better deck and showed that.

Running into Naturalize really was a bad move, like said before. Any other play would have been better in that case. But, sometimes it is good to learn from others (and our own) mistakes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Sanctified Charges were really bad for this deck, with only 12 creatures it doesn&#8217;t do much good. This deck was going to get beat by a better deck and showed that.</p>
<p>Running into Naturalize really was a bad move, like said before. Any other play would have been better in that case. But, sometimes it is good to learn from others (and our own) mistakes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ricky</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-magic-2015-draft-2/comment-page-1/#comment-180248</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ricky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2014 18:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=30798#comment-180248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@magikado, if you get an awkward draw with a deck like this, it isn&#039;t JUST luck. This is a really awkward deck, with low power/low toughness guys, and very little way to finish the game.
Marshall, haven&#039;t I heard you talk about &#039;using two bad cards to make one good card&#039; on the podcast? IMO 2x Heliod&#039;s Pilgrim and Opressive Rays/Divine Favor is exactly that^2. You get a 1/2 on the board for 3 mana, and a marginal aura in your hand. That combination doesn&#039;t win games.
You&#039;d have been much better with the Coral Barriers and the Seraph. Multiple bodies =  more power for the Seraph, more convokers to get it on the board with.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@magikado, if you get an awkward draw with a deck like this, it isn&#8217;t JUST luck. This is a really awkward deck, with low power/low toughness guys, and very little way to finish the game.<br />
Marshall, haven&#8217;t I heard you talk about &#8216;using two bad cards to make one good card&#8217; on the podcast? IMO 2x Heliod&#8217;s Pilgrim and Opressive Rays/Divine Favor is exactly that^2. You get a 1/2 on the board for 3 mana, and a marginal aura in your hand. That combination doesn&#8217;t win games.<br />
You&#8217;d have been much better with the Coral Barriers and the Seraph. Multiple bodies =  more power for the Seraph, more convokers to get it on the board with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
