<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Limited Resources: Magic Online CUBE Draft</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-magic-online-cube-draft/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-magic-online-cube-draft/</link>
	<description>The prime source for Magic the Gathering strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2017 22:21:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: huffy henry</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-magic-online-cube-draft/comment-page-1/#comment-64923</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[huffy henry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Oct 2013 23:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=26334#comment-64923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know this is not the right spot for this comment, but based on the discussion, I&#039;ll post it anyway.

I have held out from using the beta for two reasons: 1) I become irate when I get screwed in a draft because of instability (read: crash) and 2) the horizontal layout of the turn phases is AWFUL. I know I will get &quot;used&quot; to 2) in the future, but I find it much less intuitive and when I&#039;m thinking about game phases, triggers, and stops, it means I am not focusing on decisions as much as I should.

However, I decided to give the beta a shot again in the past week because everyone keeps claiming 1) has been remedied greatly. So I hop in a Cube draft, despite the horrid payouts because I&#039;m looking for relatively easy QP. First draft I pop into at 7 players in the queue, the Beta crashes. I restart the game. I expect the Beta to be a much faster load. Instead, it sits on &quot;loading your decks&quot; for far too long. By the time I&#039;m back in the game, it&#039;s pick 5. I have four cards of different colors...I try to make the best of it. The kicker comes in pack two when I see a second copy of one of the first four cards autopicked for me. I pause, think, &quot;this is singleton, but there is copy #2.&quot; As fate would have it, that card fit into the deck I salvaged, so I snapped up copy #2. When I get to dekcbuilding, I go through my pile, submit with two copies of the card. I get an error that tells me that my deck cannot be submitted, restart and try again. Three minutes left with deckbuilding, I quickly get everything back in there, only to find I only have 1 copy of the card now. And no extra card in its slot. I am simply a card short, including this playable card.

Then I won the draft anyway.

Psyche. Lost quickly and submitted a reimbursement request.

Yes, I submitted feedback, so don&#039;t tell me about how this is the wrong spot. I am into helping them out. I have noticed a lot of positives from the beta players on this site and I wanted to add my experience. All I seem to see is &quot;V3 looks like it was coded in 1991&quot; and &quot;Beta looks great.&quot; Well, sure, the cards in the beta look nice, but I cannot play it at the moment thanks to incidents like this one. I mean, I like pretty as much as the next guy, but I&#039;d prefer to have simple, uninterrupted gameplay. I still vehemently stick to the horizontal turn phase tracker as garbage, as well. Plus, the life total, hand count, library count area is abysmally small. That is simply bad design.

So to all the anti-anti-beta people around, it&#039;s not all roses.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know this is not the right spot for this comment, but based on the discussion, I&#8217;ll post it anyway.</p>
<p>I have held out from using the beta for two reasons: 1) I become irate when I get screwed in a draft because of instability (read: crash) and 2) the horizontal layout of the turn phases is AWFUL. I know I will get &#8220;used&#8221; to 2) in the future, but I find it much less intuitive and when I&#8217;m thinking about game phases, triggers, and stops, it means I am not focusing on decisions as much as I should.</p>
<p>However, I decided to give the beta a shot again in the past week because everyone keeps claiming 1) has been remedied greatly. So I hop in a Cube draft, despite the horrid payouts because I&#8217;m looking for relatively easy QP. First draft I pop into at 7 players in the queue, the Beta crashes. I restart the game. I expect the Beta to be a much faster load. Instead, it sits on &#8220;loading your decks&#8221; for far too long. By the time I&#8217;m back in the game, it&#8217;s pick 5. I have four cards of different colors&#8230;I try to make the best of it. The kicker comes in pack two when I see a second copy of one of the first four cards autopicked for me. I pause, think, &#8220;this is singleton, but there is copy #2.&#8221; As fate would have it, that card fit into the deck I salvaged, so I snapped up copy #2. When I get to dekcbuilding, I go through my pile, submit with two copies of the card. I get an error that tells me that my deck cannot be submitted, restart and try again. Three minutes left with deckbuilding, I quickly get everything back in there, only to find I only have 1 copy of the card now. And no extra card in its slot. I am simply a card short, including this playable card.</p>
<p>Then I won the draft anyway.</p>
<p>Psyche. Lost quickly and submitted a reimbursement request.</p>
<p>Yes, I submitted feedback, so don&#8217;t tell me about how this is the wrong spot. I am into helping them out. I have noticed a lot of positives from the beta players on this site and I wanted to add my experience. All I seem to see is &#8220;V3 looks like it was coded in 1991&#8243; and &#8220;Beta looks great.&#8221; Well, sure, the cards in the beta look nice, but I cannot play it at the moment thanks to incidents like this one. I mean, I like pretty as much as the next guy, but I&#8217;d prefer to have simple, uninterrupted gameplay. I still vehemently stick to the horizontal turn phase tracker as garbage, as well. Plus, the life total, hand count, library count area is abysmally small. That is simply bad design.</p>
<p>So to all the anti-anti-beta people around, it&#8217;s not all roses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kezzerdrix</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-magic-online-cube-draft/comment-page-1/#comment-64874</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kezzerdrix]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Oct 2013 14:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=26334#comment-64874</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@kezzerdrix: With that logic, noone should ever complain about anything but the most pressing matters.

Your argument is bad and you should feel bad.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@kezzerdrix: With that logic, noone should ever complain about anything but the most pressing matters.</p>
<p>Your argument is bad and you should feel bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: entropy101</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-magic-online-cube-draft/comment-page-1/#comment-64795</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[entropy101]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2013 23:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=26334#comment-64795</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[this might sound counter intuitive but thoughtseize is still ok against mono red, while its dead late game a turn one thought seize can save you damage, taking a sulphuric vortex, shrine of burning rage, goblin guide or an ash zealot is awesome even turning fire blast in to shock is fine, messing up their curve saves you life long term, I use the same logic when thinking about snuff out, for example if you killed the hero the turn he played it, before he attacks with it you would have lost 4 life instead of loosing 6(4+battle cry) and there would have be one less creature to deal with next turn next turn leaving you alive at 4 life giving you another draw step. While it likely didn&#039;t matter it was still the correct play (IMHO).
I think the worst card in your deck vs mono red was the gravebourn muse because it costs 4 and deals repeatable damage]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this might sound counter intuitive but thoughtseize is still ok against mono red, while its dead late game a turn one thought seize can save you damage, taking a sulphuric vortex, shrine of burning rage, goblin guide or an ash zealot is awesome even turning fire blast in to shock is fine, messing up their curve saves you life long term, I use the same logic when thinking about snuff out, for example if you killed the hero the turn he played it, before he attacks with it you would have lost 4 life instead of loosing 6(4+battle cry) and there would have be one less creature to deal with next turn next turn leaving you alive at 4 life giving you another draw step. While it likely didn&#8217;t matter it was still the correct play (IMHO).<br />
I think the worst card in your deck vs mono red was the gravebourn muse because it costs 4 and deals repeatable damage</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: @Kezzerdrix</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-magic-online-cube-draft/comment-page-1/#comment-64792</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[@Kezzerdrix]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2013 22:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=26334#comment-64792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I mean, I&#039;m just going to be honest here. From a designer perspective, both clients are, in my opinion, terrible. I have to balance my distaste w/ my general enjoyment of Magic and the ease and  convenience of online play. But I mean, of all the crusades to have, the crusade of &quot;Make Wizards design a better client&quot;... like, couldn&#039;t you find better things to do with your time? 

It would be like me going to the local supermarket and protesting the fruit display section. Who really cares?

I think most people are disgruntled at you because they do not even give the client some seconds of thought and here we have one guy posting every week about it. You could be protesting how your government treats prisoners, or something. Instead we have a weekly discussion on a video game client. No one cares. It&#039;s just not that important. Let it go.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I mean, I&#8217;m just going to be honest here. From a designer perspective, both clients are, in my opinion, terrible. I have to balance my distaste w/ my general enjoyment of Magic and the ease and  convenience of online play. But I mean, of all the crusades to have, the crusade of &#8220;Make Wizards design a better client&#8221;&#8230; like, couldn&#8217;t you find better things to do with your time? </p>
<p>It would be like me going to the local supermarket and protesting the fruit display section. Who really cares?</p>
<p>I think most people are disgruntled at you because they do not even give the client some seconds of thought and here we have one guy posting every week about it. You could be protesting how your government treats prisoners, or something. Instead we have a weekly discussion on a video game client. No one cares. It&#8217;s just not that important. Let it go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kezzerdrix</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-magic-online-cube-draft/comment-page-1/#comment-64781</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kezzerdrix]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2013 19:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=26334#comment-64781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marshal tweeted earlier that the beta was &quot;full of bugs&quot; but he states that he will continue to use it. Oh the irony.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marshal tweeted earlier that the beta was &#8220;full of bugs&#8221; but he states that he will continue to use it. Oh the irony.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kezzerdrix</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-magic-online-cube-draft/comment-page-1/#comment-64724</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kezzerdrix]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2013 05:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=26334#comment-64724</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Because he should be more honest about it, instead of pretending to like the beta, which no living entity yet has.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because he should be more honest about it, instead of pretending to like the beta, which no living entity yet has.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SomeGuy</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-magic-online-cube-draft/comment-page-1/#comment-64684</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SomeGuy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2013 22:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=26334#comment-64684</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If Wizards offered to pay me to play MTGO on a turnip I would do it in a heartbeat. I&#039;m pretty sure anyone here would. Who cares?

The only difference between a &quot;sellout&quot; and any other person is opportunity. Getting paid to do something you enjoy should be everyone&#039;s goal in life. Why begrudge anyone for it?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Wizards offered to pay me to play MTGO on a turnip I would do it in a heartbeat. I&#8217;m pretty sure anyone here would. Who cares?</p>
<p>The only difference between a &#8220;sellout&#8221; and any other person is opportunity. Getting paid to do something you enjoy should be everyone&#8217;s goal in life. Why begrudge anyone for it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
