<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Limited Resources: New Spring Cube Draft #2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-new-spring-cube-draft-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-new-spring-cube-draft-2/</link>
	<description>The prime source for Magic the Gathering strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2017 22:21:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kezzerdrix</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-new-spring-cube-draft-2/comment-page-1/#comment-92701</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kezzerdrix]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2014 09:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=28516#comment-92701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[cube is a joke with this prize structure, don&#039;t play it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cube is a joke with this prize structure, don&#8217;t play it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-new-spring-cube-draft-2/comment-page-1/#comment-92592</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2014 18:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=28516#comment-92592</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There was some power there. Decks 2 &amp; 3 were no joke, and I&#039;m really curious what the decks looked like you didn&#039;t play against. My guess is someone tried for a combo like storm or reanimator and seriously just failed at it.

I like Tradewind Rider how you like man-o-war, just one of those cards that&#039;s a personal favorite. It&#039;s too bad he didn&#039;t get much action, and I&#039;ve never really been able to make him work in cube.

Thanks for more cube, wish it&#039;d stick around longer.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was some power there. Decks 2 &amp; 3 were no joke, and I&#8217;m really curious what the decks looked like you didn&#8217;t play against. My guess is someone tried for a combo like storm or reanimator and seriously just failed at it.</p>
<p>I like Tradewind Rider how you like man-o-war, just one of those cards that&#8217;s a personal favorite. It&#8217;s too bad he didn&#8217;t get much action, and I&#8217;ve never really been able to make him work in cube.</p>
<p>Thanks for more cube, wish it&#8217;d stick around longer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ronchaw</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-new-spring-cube-draft-2/comment-page-1/#comment-92403</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ronchaw]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2014 23:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=28516#comment-92403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Extremely sloppy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Extremely sloppy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Junx</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-new-spring-cube-draft-2/comment-page-1/#comment-92153</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Junx]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2014 16:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=28516#comment-92153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Human. Werewolf. Ninja.  Closed the video, uninstalled MTGO, burned my binder.  MTG is done.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Human. Werewolf. Ninja.  Closed the video, uninstalled MTGO, burned my binder.  MTG is done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-new-spring-cube-draft-2/comment-page-1/#comment-92151</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2014 16:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=28516#comment-92151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nature&#039;s Lore gets Savannah, doesn&#039;t it?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nature&#8217;s Lore gets Savannah, doesn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: April King</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-new-spring-cube-draft-2/comment-page-1/#comment-92079</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[April King]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2014 12:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=28516#comment-92079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think M1G2, the turn that you cast GSZ for 1 (to get a Mystic), you should have played a lot more aggressively.  If you had cast GSZ for 2, you could have gotten a Goyf and then Phantasmal Imaged the Goyf.  Instead of 3/3, 3/3, and 1/1, you would have had a 3/3, 3/3, 2/3, and 2/3.  Just a creature and planeswalker away from having a pair of 4/5s after that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think M1G2, the turn that you cast GSZ for 1 (to get a Mystic), you should have played a lot more aggressively.  If you had cast GSZ for 2, you could have gotten a Goyf and then Phantasmal Imaged the Goyf.  Instead of 3/3, 3/3, and 1/1, you would have had a 3/3, 3/3, 2/3, and 2/3.  Just a creature and planeswalker away from having a pair of 4/5s after that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MMogg</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-new-spring-cube-draft-2/comment-page-1/#comment-92069</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MMogg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2014 12:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=28516#comment-92069</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marshall played a similar, but better and more potent version of this deck on his most recent GatheringMagic video.  Worth checking out.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marshall played a similar, but better and more potent version of this deck on his most recent GatheringMagic video.  Worth checking out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
