<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Limited Resources: Onslaught Draft and Bonus Modern Vids</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-onslaught-draft-and-bonus-modern-vids/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-onslaught-draft-and-bonus-modern-vids/</link>
	<description>The prime source for Magic the Gathering strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2017 22:21:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-onslaught-draft-and-bonus-modern-vids/comment-page-1/#comment-9646</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[daniel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2012 19:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=17375#comment-9646</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[why oh why did you take the green cycling land over the black!?
awesome videos, very entertaining, and I haven&#039;t got to modern yet.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why oh why did you take the green cycling land over the black!?<br />
awesome videos, very entertaining, and I haven&#8217;t got to modern yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: prehemencie</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-onslaught-draft-and-bonus-modern-vids/comment-page-1/#comment-9605</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[prehemencie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 18:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=17375#comment-9605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You made me feel a bit better about my losses.  On the other hand you would probably get a lot better at the format. In the 5 drafts I did with cube prizes I did horrible every time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You made me feel a bit better about my losses.  On the other hand you would probably get a lot better at the format. In the 5 drafts I did with cube prizes I did horrible every time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oraymw</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-onslaught-draft-and-bonus-modern-vids/comment-page-1/#comment-9598</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oraymw]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2012 06:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=17375#comment-9598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Jack

RE: No removal. - Daru Stinger and Sparksmith are both great removal spells, and it is true that there are several good removal spells in Onslaught. However, remember that is a large set, and OLS is a large set, small set, small set format. Because of this, cards in Onslaught show up very irregularly. On top of this, large sets were created with more cards in those days, which meant that the cards in them became even rarer by the time the whole block was drafted together. Onslaught also has a higher percentage of creatures than most sets, so that you end up with less efficient removal. Finally, while Scourge has several removal spells, most of these are terribly inefficient. 

RE: clearly from someone who read &quot;Legions is all creatures.&quot; I&#039;m going to have to say that you are just dead wrong on this count. I drafted OLS heavily when it was first released, and have drafted it a lot as it has come back periodically. I&#039;ve also sat down and watched many matches of OLS for a series I write for PureMTGO. I am intimately familiar with the set, and it is just silly of you to make this kind of ad hominem argument.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jack</p>
<p>RE: No removal. &#8211; Daru Stinger and Sparksmith are both great removal spells, and it is true that there are several good removal spells in Onslaught. However, remember that is a large set, and OLS is a large set, small set, small set format. Because of this, cards in Onslaught show up very irregularly. On top of this, large sets were created with more cards in those days, which meant that the cards in them became even rarer by the time the whole block was drafted together. Onslaught also has a higher percentage of creatures than most sets, so that you end up with less efficient removal. Finally, while Scourge has several removal spells, most of these are terribly inefficient. </p>
<p>RE: clearly from someone who read &#8220;Legions is all creatures.&#8221; I&#8217;m going to have to say that you are just dead wrong on this count. I drafted OLS heavily when it was first released, and have drafted it a lot as it has come back periodically. I&#8217;ve also sat down and watched many matches of OLS for a series I write for PureMTGO. I am intimately familiar with the set, and it is just silly of you to make this kind of ad hominem argument.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oraymw</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-onslaught-draft-and-bonus-modern-vids/comment-page-1/#comment-9596</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oraymw]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2012 02:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=17375#comment-9596</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Jack
I&#039;ve actually draft OLS hundreds of times, and trust me it is a really bad format. Bombs and no removal.Their&#039;s actually a consensus amongst pros that OLS is the worst set.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jack<br />
I&#8217;ve actually draft OLS hundreds of times, and trust me it is a really bad format. Bombs and no removal.Their&#8217;s actually a consensus amongst pros that OLS is the worst set.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-onslaught-draft-and-bonus-modern-vids/comment-page-1/#comment-9594</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2012 18:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=17375#comment-9594</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OLS wasn&#039;t perfect, but it was actually a very interesting draft format.  How can you say it had no removal with Daru Stinger and Sparksmith at common?

Criticism of OLS here is clearly coming from someone who read &quot;Legions is all creatures&quot; and knows only that one pieces of information about the format. If you&#039;ve never played the format, don&#039;t trash it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OLS wasn&#8217;t perfect, but it was actually a very interesting draft format.  How can you say it had no removal with Daru Stinger and Sparksmith at common?</p>
<p>Criticism of OLS here is clearly coming from someone who read &#8220;Legions is all creatures&#8221; and knows only that one pieces of information about the format. If you&#8217;ve never played the format, don&#8217;t trash it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oraymn</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-onslaught-draft-and-bonus-modern-vids/comment-page-1/#comment-9591</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oraymn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2012 07:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=17375#comment-9591</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Oraymw said: &quot;the format has all the problems that AVR &quot;

Your arguments are all invalid.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Oraymw said: &#8220;the format has all the problems that AVR &#8221;</p>
<p>Your arguments are all invalid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oraymw</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-onslaught-draft-and-bonus-modern-vids/comment-page-1/#comment-9590</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oraymw]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2012 06:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=17375#comment-9590</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Bachster I stopped reading after &quot;stopped watching.&quot; Go dig a hole and sleep in it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Bachster I stopped reading after &#8220;stopped watching.&#8221; Go dig a hole and sleep in it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
