<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Limited Resources: Shards Block Draft</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-shards-block-draft/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-shards-block-draft/</link>
	<description>The prime source for Magic the Gathering strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2017 22:21:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RED_NED</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-shards-block-draft/comment-page-1/#comment-7043</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RED_NED]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 04:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=14888#comment-7043</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Would it have been worth bringing in thought hemorrhage for the branching bolts? 
Ive never played shards draft so i dunno if the 4 casting cost is too prohibitive or not.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would it have been worth bringing in thought hemorrhage for the branching bolts?<br />
Ive never played shards draft so i dunno if the 4 casting cost is too prohibitive or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rion</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-shards-block-draft/comment-page-1/#comment-7036</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rion]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 06:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=14888#comment-7036</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now I feel the need to go force bant again. Love exalted far too much.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now I feel the need to go force bant again. Love exalted far too much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darric</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-shards-block-draft/comment-page-1/#comment-7035</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Darric]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 02:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=14888#comment-7035</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[M2G2 - Having seen that he had two Branching Bolts already, I&#039;d have played around it.

You had Kathari Bomber against his Sanctum Gargoyle and Jund Hackblade. I would Dark Temper the Gargoyle, then swing in with the Bomber. You end up with 2 goblins which can trade with the Hackblade and he takes a little damage. Then don&#039;t unearth the Bombers until he&#039;s tapped out. He shouldn&#039;t get a chance to 2 for 1 you.

Your way played into Bolt too much and missed a couple of points of damage. You may have wanted to keep the Dark Temper for something bigger, but you had Battlemage and Bituminous Blast in hand.

Did you see a different line that didn&#039;t pan out or did you just not see this one?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>M2G2 &#8211; Having seen that he had two Branching Bolts already, I&#8217;d have played around it.</p>
<p>You had Kathari Bomber against his Sanctum Gargoyle and Jund Hackblade. I would Dark Temper the Gargoyle, then swing in with the Bomber. You end up with 2 goblins which can trade with the Hackblade and he takes a little damage. Then don&#8217;t unearth the Bombers until he&#8217;s tapped out. He shouldn&#8217;t get a chance to 2 for 1 you.</p>
<p>Your way played into Bolt too much and missed a couple of points of damage. You may have wanted to keep the Dark Temper for something bigger, but you had Battlemage and Bituminous Blast in hand.</p>
<p>Did you see a different line that didn&#8217;t pan out or did you just not see this one?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elliott</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-shards-block-draft/comment-page-1/#comment-7033</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Elliott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 10:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=14888#comment-7033</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Really? Stun Sniper, double Branching Bolt, Path, Dark Temper? Must be nice.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really? Stun Sniper, double Branching Bolt, Path, Dark Temper? Must be nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SonataGuardian</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-shards-block-draft/comment-page-1/#comment-7031</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SonataGuardian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 18:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=14888#comment-7031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have the absolute worst timing. Sorry for messing up the start of the Round 1 Video!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have the absolute worst timing. Sorry for messing up the start of the Round 1 Video!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russian Hot Nipple</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/limited-resources-shards-block-draft/comment-page-1/#comment-7029</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Russian Hot Nipple]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 08:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=14888#comment-7029</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey, Marsh! I would love to see more draft action with Jon Louks , you two make such a good team )]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, Marsh! I would love to see more draft action with Jon Louks , you two make such a good team )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
