<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LoadingReadyRun Draft #23: Borzhov</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/loadingreadyrun-draft-23/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/loadingreadyrun-draft-23/</link>
	<description>The prime source for Magic the Gathering strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2017 22:21:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr_Zaius</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/loadingreadyrun-draft-23/comment-page-1/#comment-24786</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dr_Zaius]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 22:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=22346#comment-24786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Eyeball Draft -- alternately picking cards with the most and fewest visible eyeballs.  Defining &#039;visible&#039; leaves room for interpretation.

Contaminated Ground could find a place in the no attack/extort deck.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Eyeball Draft &#8212; alternately picking cards with the most and fewest visible eyeballs.  Defining &#8216;visible&#8217; leaves room for interpretation.</p>
<p>Contaminated Ground could find a place in the no attack/extort deck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: knx</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/loadingreadyrun-draft-23/comment-page-1/#comment-24720</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[knx]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 17:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=22346#comment-24720</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think you (and everyone else) misses something on the cackling perimeters : they need you to tap a gate to do 1 damage.  SO : there is NO point in having more then one, cause they all need to be activated by tapping them first and then a gate, so eacht gate can only be used once each turn no matter how many perimeters you own.
Or do I read the card wrong ?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you (and everyone else) misses something on the cackling perimeters : they need you to tap a gate to do 1 damage.  SO : there is NO point in having more then one, cause they all need to be activated by tapping them first and then a gate, so eacht gate can only be used once each turn no matter how many perimeters you own.<br />
Or do I read the card wrong ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wat</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/loadingreadyrun-draft-23/comment-page-1/#comment-23978</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 19:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=22346#comment-23978</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How is 2 black sources enough? You could easily play 2 swamps and the gate, without ruining your mana base.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is 2 black sources enough? You could easily play 2 swamps and the gate, without ruining your mana base.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ertzi</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/loadingreadyrun-draft-23/comment-page-1/#comment-23895</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ertzi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 14:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=22346#comment-23895</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This was only the second LRR I stopped watching after the first video. I am not angry or anything, and I will now calmly explain why I stopped watching.

You have to ask yourselves, what is your purpose? What was different about this compared to the million other straight-up &quot;drafting good decks&quot; drafts out there? Nothing, and this is sad, because I have seen your funny hats videos.

I believe that the purpose of this series is more to be funny than trying to draft good decks, which would make this draft a failure. I&#039;m sorry but if I want to watch competent play, I will watch Simon or LSV. You guys are supposed to be wacky, so please at least try. I want you to try to draft off-beat, strange decks. That is why I personally watch you guys. The moment you simply start drafting regular decks I will stop watching.

You also chose to go with Boros, which is the most boring guild by leaps and bounds. I still love you guys, but this was a total failure as a part of the LRR comedy draft series.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was only the second LRR I stopped watching after the first video. I am not angry or anything, and I will now calmly explain why I stopped watching.</p>
<p>You have to ask yourselves, what is your purpose? What was different about this compared to the million other straight-up &#8220;drafting good decks&#8221; drafts out there? Nothing, and this is sad, because I have seen your funny hats videos.</p>
<p>I believe that the purpose of this series is more to be funny than trying to draft good decks, which would make this draft a failure. I&#8217;m sorry but if I want to watch competent play, I will watch Simon or LSV. You guys are supposed to be wacky, so please at least try. I want you to try to draft off-beat, strange decks. That is why I personally watch you guys. The moment you simply start drafting regular decks I will stop watching.</p>
<p>You also chose to go with Boros, which is the most boring guild by leaps and bounds. I still love you guys, but this was a total failure as a part of the LRR comedy draft series.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: headshotcatcher</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/loadingreadyrun-draft-23/comment-page-1/#comment-23621</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[headshotcatcher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 21:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=22346#comment-23621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You guys should do a draft where you can never pick the same colours twice in a row, so if you take a red/white card first pick, you can&#039;t take another red or white card the second pick :D

Or one where the first pick (or the rare) of every first pick declares the colours youn can pick from that pack :D So if you pick aurelia first pack you have to only pick red and white cards that entire pack, but if theres a rubblehulk in the second pack you can only take red and green cards for that entire pack :D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys should do a draft where you can never pick the same colours twice in a row, so if you take a red/white card first pick, you can&#8217;t take another red or white card the second pick <img src="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif" alt=":D" class="wp-smiley" /> </p>
<p>Or one where the first pick (or the rare) of every first pick declares the colours youn can pick from that pack <img src="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif" alt=":D" class="wp-smiley" />  So if you pick aurelia first pack you have to only pick red and white cards that entire pack, but if theres a rubblehulk in the second pack you can only take red and green cards for that entire pack <img src="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif" alt=":D" class="wp-smiley" /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/loadingreadyrun-draft-23/comment-page-1/#comment-23425</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 09:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=22346#comment-23425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Impatient draft:

You MUST play a card or attack every turn, regardless of how bad a play it seems to be. You&#039;ll probably have to get a bunch of cheap spells to guarantee you can do SOMETHING every turn.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Impatient draft:</p>
<p>You MUST play a card or attack every turn, regardless of how bad a play it seems to be. You&#8217;ll probably have to get a bunch of cheap spells to guarantee you can do SOMETHING every turn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thor_Odinson</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/loadingreadyrun-draft-23/comment-page-1/#comment-23352</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thor_Odinson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 05:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=22346#comment-23352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you guys want to draft a 5-colour deck, here&#039;s a guide to getting one that can win games: http://www.starcitygames.com/article/25711_First-Picking-Prophetic-Prism.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you guys want to draft a 5-colour deck, here&#8217;s a guide to getting one that can win games: <a href="http://www.starcitygames.com/article/25711_First-Picking-Prophetic-Prism.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.starcitygames.com/article/25711_First-Picking-Prophetic-Prism.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
