<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LoadingReadyRun Draft #28: Going for Gold in GTC!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/loadingreadyrun-draft-28-going-for-gold-in-gtc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/loadingreadyrun-draft-28-going-for-gold-in-gtc/</link>
	<description>The prime source for Magic the Gathering strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2017 22:21:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/loadingreadyrun-draft-28-going-for-gold-in-gtc/comment-page-1/#comment-55339</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 10:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=23598#comment-55339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I appreciate you taking fixing and attempting to make a playable deck rather than a pile of unsynergistic cards.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate you taking fixing and attempting to make a playable deck rather than a pile of unsynergistic cards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BC</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/loadingreadyrun-draft-28-going-for-gold-in-gtc/comment-page-1/#comment-55243</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 00:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=23598#comment-55243</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[James, you seem like a pretty cool guy, but I&#039;m going to level with you: You really phoned this one in. When you&#039;re co-commentating with Graham, you usually have some constructive comments or try and make the deck have a good shot at winning. You knew going into this the deck was going to have difficult mana, yet you did not even try to optimize your land colors prior to starting. You would have been able to at least cast some spells more often if you had bothered to take a few of the minutes given to you by the client and really crunch out a good mana base in terms of basic lands.

You can do better. I&#039;ve seen you do it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James, you seem like a pretty cool guy, but I&#8217;m going to level with you: You really phoned this one in. When you&#8217;re co-commentating with Graham, you usually have some constructive comments or try and make the deck have a good shot at winning. You knew going into this the deck was going to have difficult mana, yet you did not even try to optimize your land colors prior to starting. You would have been able to at least cast some spells more often if you had bothered to take a few of the minutes given to you by the client and really crunch out a good mana base in terms of basic lands.</p>
<p>You can do better. I&#8217;ve seen you do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maestro</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/loadingreadyrun-draft-28-going-for-gold-in-gtc/comment-page-1/#comment-55203</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maestro]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 06:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=23598#comment-55203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with whoever else said it wasn&#039;t that fun to watch - these videos need Graham&#039;s style of not caring about the quality of the deck as much as the amusing result of the ridiculous rules put in place and just having a good time with it. James makes it too clear that he&#039;s in it to win it rather than to give us what we came to watch: entertainingly-made decks with amusing commentary.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with whoever else said it wasn&#8217;t that fun to watch &#8211; these videos need Graham&#8217;s style of not caring about the quality of the deck as much as the amusing result of the ridiculous rules put in place and just having a good time with it. James makes it too clear that he&#8217;s in it to win it rather than to give us what we came to watch: entertainingly-made decks with amusing commentary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: #2Fan</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/loadingreadyrun-draft-28-going-for-gold-in-gtc/comment-page-1/#comment-55187</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[#2Fan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 00:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=23598#comment-55187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There were so many times during draft when I was shouting &#039;Pick the prism&#039;. In a 5-color deck, a prism will do so much more work than any one guildgate.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There were so many times during draft when I was shouting &#8216;Pick the prism&#8217;. In a 5-color deck, a prism will do so much more work than any one guildgate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JP</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/loadingreadyrun-draft-28-going-for-gold-in-gtc/comment-page-1/#comment-55173</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JP]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 19:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=23598#comment-55173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I usually love the LRR videos, but this one was kind of unenjoyable. For one, making up rules and ignoring the theme of a theme draft kind of defeats the purpose. For another, commenting the whole time about how horrible the deck is and how you have no chance is simply not fun to watch. We love seeing you go up against impossible odds and at least having fun and doing interesting things even if we all know you can&#039;t win. And finally, I&#039;m no MtG expert, but even I had several &quot;What is he thinking?&quot; moments during these videos.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I usually love the LRR videos, but this one was kind of unenjoyable. For one, making up rules and ignoring the theme of a theme draft kind of defeats the purpose. For another, commenting the whole time about how horrible the deck is and how you have no chance is simply not fun to watch. We love seeing you go up against impossible odds and at least having fun and doing interesting things even if we all know you can&#8217;t win. And finally, I&#8217;m no MtG expert, but even I had several &#8220;What is he thinking?&#8221; moments during these videos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: knx</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/loadingreadyrun-draft-28-going-for-gold-in-gtc/comment-page-1/#comment-55168</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[knx]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 18:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=23598#comment-55168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[when playing 5 colors and 2 verdant havens (and the untapguys) ALWAYS have at least 8 green mana sources !!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>when playing 5 colors and 2 verdant havens (and the untapguys) ALWAYS have at least 8 green mana sources !!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maestro</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/loadingreadyrun-draft-28-going-for-gold-in-gtc/comment-page-1/#comment-55163</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maestro]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 17:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=23598#comment-55163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think so - his opponent was at 5 life the first turn the Paladin could attack. Trading it off would remove another extorter, forcing him to chump the Wurm with his Gutter Skulk, bringing him down to one creature. Until he drew a way to kill the Wurm, he&#039;d be on auto-chump from then on with any creatures he could get down.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think so &#8211; his opponent was at 5 life the first turn the Paladin could attack. Trading it off would remove another extorter, forcing him to chump the Wurm with his Gutter Skulk, bringing him down to one creature. Until he drew a way to kill the Wurm, he&#8217;d be on auto-chump from then on with any creatures he could get down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
