<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: M:tG Cribbs #1: Standard DE with Blue-White Flash</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/mtg-cribbs-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/mtg-cribbs-1/</link>
	<description>The prime source for Magic the Gathering strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2017 22:21:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crabbs42</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/mtg-cribbs-1/comment-page-1/#comment-11372</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Crabbs42]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 18:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=19252#comment-11372</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are but I was testing Gerry Thompson&#039;s list which didn&#039;t have either. This may be worse and play hellkite could be better. It is just hard to race when more dedicated aggro decks are usually faster and the control decks have Thragtusk and can go over the top of you very easily. Especially with the flash decks playing less counters than before.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are but I was testing Gerry Thompson&#8217;s list which didn&#8217;t have either. This may be worse and play hellkite could be better. It is just hard to race when more dedicated aggro decks are usually faster and the control decks have Thragtusk and can go over the top of you very easily. Especially with the flash decks playing less counters than before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PB</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/mtg-cribbs-1/comment-page-1/#comment-11360</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PB]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 06:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=19252#comment-11360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(oops, that was me above)

I think there&#039;s a UWR list around that runs both geist and hellkite? That one seems ok, it has both the ability to race and the necessary burn.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(oops, that was me above)</p>
<p>I think there&#8217;s a UWR list around that runs both geist and hellkite? That one seems ok, it has both the ability to race and the necessary burn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crabbs42</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/mtg-cribbs-1/comment-page-1/#comment-11359</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Crabbs42]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 06:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=19252#comment-11359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d have to agree with you there. I think the UWR version is  a lot better at this moment. Adding burn spells solves a lot or problems that you mentioned. But I don&#039;t like geist at all right now. It is only good in the mirror as creature decks have too many cheap creatures to block it and the control decks have Supreme Verdict. Depending on how the format evolves this deck could be better but as of right now I would put it on the shelf for a bit.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d have to agree with you there. I think the UWR version is  a lot better at this moment. Adding burn spells solves a lot or problems that you mentioned. But I don&#8217;t like geist at all right now. It is only good in the mirror as creature decks have too many cheap creatures to block it and the control decks have Supreme Verdict. Depending on how the format evolves this deck could be better but as of right now I would put it on the shelf for a bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/mtg-cribbs-1/comment-page-1/#comment-11358</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 03:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=19252#comment-11358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Enjoyed the vid, good to see standard content here again.

I&#039;m not sure that I really like the deck though, it just seems so weak to anything which has a cavern and/or threats &gt; X/2 (cavern naming vampire, play olivia and your only out is a sweeper? Cavern naming beast and your out is....??) and also doesn&#039;t have geist or anything to be able to go under other sphinx&#039;s revelation decks, which will own you in the long game.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enjoyed the vid, good to see standard content here again.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure that I really like the deck though, it just seems so weak to anything which has a cavern and/or threats &gt; X/2 (cavern naming vampire, play olivia and your only out is a sweeper? Cavern naming beast and your out is&#8230;.??) and also doesn&#8217;t have geist or anything to be able to go under other sphinx&#8217;s revelation decks, which will own you in the long game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Moore</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/mtg-cribbs-1/comment-page-1/#comment-11330</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Moore]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 03:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=19252#comment-11330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree that it&#039;s nice to see some Standard videos. Welcome to the site!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that it&#8217;s nice to see some Standard videos. Welcome to the site!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Cribbs</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/mtg-cribbs-1/comment-page-1/#comment-11326</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan Cribbs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 22:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=19252#comment-11326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cavern usually comes mostly for a 25th land against control and then names angel. It&#039;s almost always more important to resolve restoration angel then augur or snapcaster.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cavern usually comes mostly for a 25th land against control and then names angel. It&#8217;s almost always more important to resolve restoration angel then augur or snapcaster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Undersol</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/mtg-cribbs-1/comment-page-1/#comment-11322</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Undersol]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 19:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=19252#comment-11322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just wondering, when you do side in Cavern of Souls do you name Angel or Wizard? Which card/cards need to not get countered, that is?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wondering, when you do side in Cavern of Souls do you name Angel or Wizard? Which card/cards need to not get countered, that is?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
