<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: M:tG Cribbs #102: Standard Blue-Green Timewalk-Fog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/mtg-cribbs-102-standard-blue-green-timewalk-fog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/mtg-cribbs-102-standard-blue-green-timewalk-fog/</link>
	<description>The prime source for Magic the Gathering strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2017 22:21:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kwitz</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/mtg-cribbs-102-standard-blue-green-timewalk-fog/comment-page-1/#comment-270756</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kwitz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2015 12:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=35006#comment-270756</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fun deck Ryan. What lame flaming? Given the comments, they must lead pretty sad lives.  Sad when it denigrates into such tripe. Anyways, I always enjoy your videos, even if they are not always successful. They are a good exercise and ask excellent questions of the game. Please continue to provide the value that you do!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fun deck Ryan. What lame flaming? Given the comments, they must lead pretty sad lives.  Sad when it denigrates into such tripe. Anyways, I always enjoy your videos, even if they are not always successful. They are a good exercise and ask excellent questions of the game. Please continue to provide the value that you do!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DrDrJ</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/mtg-cribbs-102-standard-blue-green-timewalk-fog/comment-page-1/#comment-270742</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DrDrJ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2015 01:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=35006#comment-270742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great video and fun deck, Ryan. Don&#039;t worry about trolls like obZen. Even though I don&#039;t comment on every article, I watch every video and feel like you make me a better player. I think people forget that decks that are designed to win can be annoying to the opposing player, but that&#039;s why you don&#039;t take it into the casual play lobby.

As I was watching this I was wondering if making this deck blue-white-green would work:
fortified rampart instead of jaddi offshoot
encircling fisher, pressure point, and alchemist&#039;s vial as additional fogs

I also agree that more ramp is needed. I think embodiment of spring would be good, giving you a sacrificial blocker for a turn. I also think blighted woodland would work well in this deck. I might even consider Nissa&#039;s renewal.
I would trade dragonlord&#039;s perogative for some combination of pressure point, alchemist&#039;s vial. Put dispels in sideboard. I&#039;d also run 22 lands.

Although honestly, I agree that this standard is almost too powerful for this deck to get any traction. Especially to rally decks, a version of which is now seeing play in modern.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great video and fun deck, Ryan. Don&#8217;t worry about trolls like obZen. Even though I don&#8217;t comment on every article, I watch every video and feel like you make me a better player. I think people forget that decks that are designed to win can be annoying to the opposing player, but that&#8217;s why you don&#8217;t take it into the casual play lobby.</p>
<p>As I was watching this I was wondering if making this deck blue-white-green would work:<br />
fortified rampart instead of jaddi offshoot<br />
encircling fisher, pressure point, and alchemist&#8217;s vial as additional fogs</p>
<p>I also agree that more ramp is needed. I think embodiment of spring would be good, giving you a sacrificial blocker for a turn. I also think blighted woodland would work well in this deck. I might even consider Nissa&#8217;s renewal.<br />
I would trade dragonlord&#8217;s perogative for some combination of pressure point, alchemist&#8217;s vial. Put dispels in sideboard. I&#8217;d also run 22 lands.</p>
<p>Although honestly, I agree that this standard is almost too powerful for this deck to get any traction. Especially to rally decks, a version of which is now seeing play in modern.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
