<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: M:tG Cribbs #57: Standard with Naya Possibility Storm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/mtg-cribbs-57-standard-with-naya-possibility-storm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/mtg-cribbs-57-standard-with-naya-possibility-storm/</link>
	<description>The prime source for Magic the Gathering strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2017 22:21:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Roads</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/mtg-cribbs-57-standard-with-naya-possibility-storm/comment-page-1/#comment-193213</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam Roads]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2014 02:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=31281#comment-193213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The combo is a &#039;win more&#039; technology, so the deck is simply worse than an equivalent mid range which doesn&#039;t spend the slots on the combo.

That said, if you face monored, drop out every big card you can. Elspeth is way worse than a 3 mana 2/1 or even 
a Boros Charm. Games are over, one way or the other, by turn 6.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The combo is a &#8216;win more&#8217; technology, so the deck is simply worse than an equivalent mid range which doesn&#8217;t spend the slots on the combo.</p>
<p>That said, if you face monored, drop out every big card you can. Elspeth is way worse than a 3 mana 2/1 or even<br />
a Boros Charm. Games are over, one way or the other, by turn 6.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymouse Part Trois</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/mtg-cribbs-57-standard-with-naya-possibility-storm/comment-page-1/#comment-191614</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymouse Part Trois]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 06:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=31281#comment-191614</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ Reyemile

I was gonna reply that the second spell gets countered, but maybe it doesn&#039;t, because the cast off of possibility storm is a may ability. If that&#039;s the case, both players could continually cast spells and decline to cast the one they hit via possibility storm to avoid decking themselves, and then the game would go to time, which would mean that Ryan would win given that he was ahead on time, and assuming he can play at the same speed as his opponent. That all assumes I understand that interaction correctly, though.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Reyemile</p>
<p>I was gonna reply that the second spell gets countered, but maybe it doesn&#8217;t, because the cast off of possibility storm is a may ability. If that&#8217;s the case, both players could continually cast spells and decline to cast the one they hit via possibility storm to avoid decking themselves, and then the game would go to time, which would mean that Ryan would win given that he was ahead on time, and assuming he can play at the same speed as his opponent. That all assumes I understand that interaction correctly, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reyemile</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/mtg-cribbs-57-standard-with-naya-possibility-storm/comment-page-1/#comment-191527</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Reyemile]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2014 18:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=31281#comment-191527</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How did you get decked at the end of round 1? You can just keep casting spells to Possibility Storm, and the spells get shuffled back into your deck!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How did you get decked at the end of round 1? You can just keep casting spells to Possibility Storm, and the spells get shuffled back into your deck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lantis</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/mtg-cribbs-57-standard-with-naya-possibility-storm/comment-page-1/#comment-191394</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lantis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2014 06:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=31281#comment-191394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting idea!
You should include a 1-off rogue passage as an alternative win con tho]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting idea!<br />
You should include a 1-off rogue passage as an alternative win con tho</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sev</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/mtg-cribbs-57-standard-with-naya-possibility-storm/comment-page-1/#comment-191376</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sev]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2014 05:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=31281#comment-191376</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What about adding Chandra to the deck? With the 0 ability, you can continue casting spells when once the Eidolon/Possibilty lock is assembled.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about adding Chandra to the deck? With the 0 ability, you can continue casting spells when once the Eidolon/Possibilty lock is assembled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crabbs42</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/mtg-cribbs-57-standard-with-naya-possibility-storm/comment-page-1/#comment-191266</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Crabbs42]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2014 17:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=31281#comment-191266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey everyone, sorry about the audio problems. Everything looked fine on my end when I was recording. Hopefully you can still get some enjoyment from the videos anyways :P 
And to Steve, Mutavault can&#039;t block Lifebane Zombie. Intimidate creatures can only be blocked by creatures of their color of artifact creatures and Mutavault is neither of those.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey everyone, sorry about the audio problems. Everything looked fine on my end when I was recording. Hopefully you can still get some enjoyment from the videos anyways <img src="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif" alt=":P" class="wp-smiley" /><br />
And to Steve, Mutavault can&#8217;t block Lifebane Zombie. Intimidate creatures can only be blocked by creatures of their color of artifact creatures and Mutavault is neither of those.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daracaex</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/mtg-cribbs-57-standard-with-naya-possibility-storm/comment-page-1/#comment-191262</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daracaex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2014 16:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=31281#comment-191262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting deck idea, but your videos get fairly close to unwatchable with the audio desync.  There&#039;s little point to commentary when it&#039;s difficult to see what&#039;s being commentated on.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting deck idea, but your videos get fairly close to unwatchable with the audio desync.  There&#8217;s little point to commentary when it&#8217;s difficult to see what&#8217;s being commentated on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
