<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: M:tG Cribbs #59: Villainous Wealth in Standard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/mtg-cribbs-59-villainous-wealth-in-standard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/mtg-cribbs-59-villainous-wealth-in-standard/</link>
	<description>The prime source for Magic the Gathering strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2017 22:21:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pearce</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/mtg-cribbs-59-villainous-wealth-in-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-198962</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pearce]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2014 22:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=31522#comment-198962</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why not font of fertility instead of embodiment of spring?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not font of fertility instead of embodiment of spring?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laopooh</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/mtg-cribbs-59-villainous-wealth-in-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-198941</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Laopooh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2014 20:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=31522#comment-198941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Round 2 game 1 those Jeskai Charms were time walks with a lightning helix stapled on, he wasn&#039;t trading down at all.

Thanks for the videos, I always enjoy them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Round 2 game 1 those Jeskai Charms were time walks with a lightning helix stapled on, he wasn&#8217;t trading down at all.</p>
<p>Thanks for the videos, I always enjoy them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emisun</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/mtg-cribbs-59-villainous-wealth-in-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-198895</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Emisun]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2014 15:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=31522#comment-198895</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Round 3, not taking the 3 for 1 with the &quot;drown in sorrow&quot; against a monored opponent seems loose.

Thanks for these fun videos!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Round 3, not taking the 3 for 1 with the &#8220;drown in sorrow&#8221; against a monored opponent seems loose.</p>
<p>Thanks for these fun videos!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JMOSHER</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/mtg-cribbs-59-villainous-wealth-in-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-198632</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JMOSHER]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2014 16:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=31522#comment-198632</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Round 1, game 2 instead of skeletal scrying, you could have Aetherspouted both lions and then untapped and wealthed both to your side of the field, this would have allowed you to even activate monstrosity with your caryatid afterward. Tempo gain would have been enormous I think.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Round 1, game 2 instead of skeletal scrying, you could have Aetherspouted both lions and then untapped and wealthed both to your side of the field, this would have allowed you to even activate monstrosity with your caryatid afterward. Tempo gain would have been enormous I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
