<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: M:tG Cribbs #95: Abzan Azcendancy in Standard (with BFZ!)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/mtg-cribbs-95-abzan-azcendancy-in-standard-with-bfz/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/mtg-cribbs-95-abzan-azcendancy-in-standard-with-bfz/</link>
	<description>The prime source for Magic the Gathering strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2017 22:21:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dank</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/mtg-cribbs-95-abzan-azcendancy-in-standard-with-bfz/comment-page-1/#comment-258885</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dank]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2015 03:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=34713#comment-258885</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In round 5, game 1, I think you should have considered sacrificing hangarback to Executioner, then playing ascendancy to pump all the tokens.  That puts the most power out, and plays around Ulamog exiling your hangarback.  Cool deck, great videos.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In round 5, game 1, I think you should have considered sacrificing hangarback to Executioner, then playing ascendancy to pump all the tokens.  That puts the most power out, and plays around Ulamog exiling your hangarback.  Cool deck, great videos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
