<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obliteration!!!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/obliteration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/obliteration/</link>
	<description>The prime source for Magic the Gathering strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2017 22:21:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SaiDes</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/obliteration/comment-page-1/#comment-1424</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SaiDes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 15:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=7408#comment-1424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very interesting deck, I like the variety plus having a nice big win condition and lots of ways to achieve it are good.

Not played 100 card singleton before but it seems like a fun way to do things casually]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting deck, I like the variety plus having a nice big win condition and lots of ways to achieve it are good.</p>
<p>Not played 100 card singleton before but it seems like a fun way to do things casually</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ShardFenix</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/obliteration/comment-page-1/#comment-1390</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShardFenix]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 23:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=7408#comment-1390</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[well lunco said my post already but I agree this looks like a nice EDH deck as well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well lunco said my post already but I agree this looks like a nice EDH deck as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lunco</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/obliteration/comment-page-1/#comment-1322</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lunco]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 21:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=7408#comment-1322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This seems similar to the EDH Jhoira Build - maybe you should try that in Commander. I&#039;ve played with it IRL and it&#039;s pretty sick, the only problem is that it paints a huge target on your back :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This seems similar to the EDH Jhoira Build &#8211; maybe you should try that in Commander. I&#8217;ve played with it IRL and it&#8217;s pretty sick, the only problem is that it paints a huge target on your back <img src="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" class="wp-smiley" /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zimbardo</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/obliteration/comment-page-1/#comment-1320</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zimbardo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 17:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=7408#comment-1320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sphinx of Lost Truths: agreed, it&#039;s a pretty good fit, and I almost included it in my list.  Its power gives a bit of a generous clock in an end game situation, but I&#039;m sure it would work pretty well nonetheless.  

I don&#039;t think anybody complained to me about land destruction while I was playing this deck.  If I were to make this more of a controlling Wildfire deck instead, on the other hand, then I&#039;d probably get a few complaints.  Lately it seems like the casual room runs more powerful decks than it did six months ago, but I suppose one advantage of that is that you get less complaints about particular forms of disruption.  In any case, I think Obliteration of Jokulhaups is less likely to offend somebody than Armaggedon, because it doesn&#039;t seem like as much of a cheap shot.  

I had [card]Numot, the Devastator[/card] in my original Red-Blue-White build, and the one time I got to attack with him, it felt like an annoying LD win.  So I took him out, and maybe Detritivore could come out for similar reasons (replaced by Chronicler, like you say).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sphinx of Lost Truths: agreed, it&#8217;s a pretty good fit, and I almost included it in my list.  Its power gives a bit of a generous clock in an end game situation, but I&#8217;m sure it would work pretty well nonetheless.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think anybody complained to me about land destruction while I was playing this deck.  If I were to make this more of a controlling Wildfire deck instead, on the other hand, then I&#8217;d probably get a few complaints.  Lately it seems like the casual room runs more powerful decks than it did six months ago, but I suppose one advantage of that is that you get less complaints about particular forms of disruption.  In any case, I think Obliteration of Jokulhaups is less likely to offend somebody than Armaggedon, because it doesn&#8217;t seem like as much of a cheap shot.  </p>
<p>I had <a href="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/wp-content/plugins/mtgo-wp-mtg-helper/mtg_helper_cardfinder.php?find=Numot%2C+the+Devastator&width=223&height=310" class="jTip" name="Numot, the Devastator">Numot, the Devastator</a> in my original Red-Blue-White build, and the one time I got to attack with him, it felt like an annoying LD win.  So I took him out, and maybe Detritivore could come out for similar reasons (replaced by Chronicler, like you say).<img src='http://gatherer.wizards.com/Handlers/Image.ashx?size=small&type=card&name=Numot, the Devastator&options=' style='display:none;width:1px;height:1px;' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: platipus10</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/obliteration/comment-page-1/#comment-1319</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[platipus10]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 15:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=7408#comment-1319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another great article Zim!

I think the deck could use Sphinx of Lost Truths though.  It has 5 toughness and can either draw or dig to your sweepers.  Plus you said you were considering Chonicler but are often low on cards.  Perhaps Sphinx over Detritivore.

I find it odd too when people in the casual room get upset about LD even when you basically win right away with it.  I can see long grinding games with spot LD being annoying, but a mass LD with a massive win condition on the board is not that annoying in my opinion.  It&#039;s just a way to lock up the win.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another great article Zim!</p>
<p>I think the deck could use Sphinx of Lost Truths though.  It has 5 toughness and can either draw or dig to your sweepers.  Plus you said you were considering Chonicler but are often low on cards.  Perhaps Sphinx over Detritivore.</p>
<p>I find it odd too when people in the casual room get upset about LD even when you basically win right away with it.  I can see long grinding games with spot LD being annoying, but a mass LD with a massive win condition on the board is not that annoying in my opinion.  It&#8217;s just a way to lock up the win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: _Makaveli</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/obliteration/comment-page-1/#comment-1317</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[_Makaveli]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 13:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=7408#comment-1317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting article. I built a remotely similar deck a few months ago (well at least it contained suspend creatures and Obi/Decree/Arm/War) but I&#039;ve found all too many times that people in the causal room get really upset by land destruction so I stopped playing it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article. I built a remotely similar deck a few months ago (well at least it contained suspend creatures and Obi/Decree/Arm/War) but I&#8217;ve found all too many times that people in the causal room get really upset by land destruction so I stopped playing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
