<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Peering Into Pauper: Innistrad In-Depth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/peering-into-pauper-innistrad-in-depth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/peering-into-pauper-innistrad-in-depth/</link>
	<description>The prime source for Magic the Gathering strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2017 22:21:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pitlord</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/peering-into-pauper-innistrad-in-depth/comment-page-1/#comment-6206</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pitlord]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 13:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=14234#comment-6206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To be honest I totally forgot about bear while constructing the list. It was quickly pointed out to me on Twitter that I did so, and some suggestions for entirely different lists were tossed around a little. I can post some of the ideas if you like.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be honest I totally forgot about bear while constructing the list. It was quickly pointed out to me on Twitter that I did so, and some suggestions for entirely different lists were tossed around a little. I can post some of the ideas if you like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: milegyenanevem</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/peering-into-pauper-innistrad-in-depth/comment-page-1/#comment-6203</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[milegyenanevem]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 08:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=14234#comment-6203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did you consider Phantasmal Bear for the blue aggro?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you consider Phantasmal Bear for the blue aggro?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/peering-into-pauper-innistrad-in-depth/comment-page-1/#comment-6200</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 02:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=14234#comment-6200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[you forgot that pauper has 2 reanimator spells :p
exhume and unearth :D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you forgot that pauper has 2 reanimator spells :p<br />
exhume and unearth <img src="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif" alt=":D" class="wp-smiley" /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pitlord</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/peering-into-pauper-innistrad-in-depth/comment-page-1/#comment-6198</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pitlord]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 20:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=14234#comment-6198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On one hand I kind of like the idea since Alchemy is a decent enough draw engine on its own, and having multiple lines of attack is awesome. It would probably take a complete re-tooling though since you&#039;d probably also want Deep Analysis and probably a touch less removal since you&#039;d be bringing back one of their men with exhume as well. Certainly worth testing though, at the very least it would probably be fun.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On one hand I kind of like the idea since Alchemy is a decent enough draw engine on its own, and having multiple lines of attack is awesome. It would probably take a complete re-tooling though since you&#8217;d probably also want Deep Analysis and probably a touch less removal since you&#8217;d be bringing back one of their men with exhume as well. Certainly worth testing though, at the very least it would probably be fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: browndr</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/peering-into-pauper-innistrad-in-depth/comment-page-1/#comment-6197</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[browndr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 19:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=14234#comment-6197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, I just had an evil thought of adding Forbidden Alchemy to IzzetPost and adding a complement of reanimator spells.  Not sure what to pull for them, but effectively doubling the effeciency of Crusher sounds like awesome sauce to me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, I just had an evil thought of adding Forbidden Alchemy to IzzetPost and adding a complement of reanimator spells.  Not sure what to pull for them, but effectively doubling the effeciency of Crusher sounds like awesome sauce to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
