<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Peering Into Pauper: Poor Pauper Performers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/peering-into-pauper-poor-pauper-performers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/peering-into-pauper-poor-pauper-performers/</link>
	<description>The prime source for Magic the Gathering strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2017 22:21:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tehmoarbaus</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/peering-into-pauper-poor-pauper-performers/comment-page-1/#comment-6195</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tehmoarbaus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 07:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=13687#comment-6195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Isn&#039;t preordain a lot better than dimir transmuter in the reanimate list? Getting one of the 18 lands is often important. Also, does forbidden alchemy make the deck stronger? Seems like it would.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t preordain a lot better than dimir transmuter in the reanimate list? Getting one of the 18 lands is often important. Also, does forbidden alchemy make the deck stronger? Seems like it would.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shrip</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/peering-into-pauper-poor-pauper-performers/comment-page-1/#comment-5722</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[shrip]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 04:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=13687#comment-5722</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i think one of the contributors to this problem is that pauper can be a pretty stagnant format sometimes, so often people will try to make one of these decks work just for the hell of it when they could actually be playing more competitive decks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think one of the contributors to this problem is that pauper can be a pretty stagnant format sometimes, so often people will try to make one of these decks work just for the hell of it when they could actually be playing more competitive decks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malum</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/peering-into-pauper-poor-pauper-performers/comment-page-1/#comment-5721</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Malum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 03:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=13687#comment-5721</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I very much like this article.  My only request is if you could revisit your affinity deck.  

the links in the original article seem broken]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I very much like this article.  My only request is if you could revisit your affinity deck.  </p>
<p>the links in the original article seem broken</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amukasier</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/peering-into-pauper-poor-pauper-performers/comment-page-1/#comment-5717</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[amukasier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 19:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=13687#comment-5717</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I Disagree.

MUC has very good match-up against WW, Goblins aren`t that bad too. Its just a matter of good mulligans decisions.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I Disagree.</p>
<p>MUC has very good match-up against WW, Goblins aren`t that bad too. Its just a matter of good mulligans decisions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
