<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Phormat Physics &#8211; Pauper UR TronPost</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/phormat-physics-pauper-ur-tronpost/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/phormat-physics-pauper-ur-tronpost/</link>
	<description>The prime source for Magic the Gathering strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2017 22:21:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geaux_Big007</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/phormat-physics-pauper-ur-tronpost/comment-page-1/#comment-9568</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Geaux_Big007]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 19:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=10760#comment-9568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fade Away is not legal in pauper. I know i&#039;m in 2012...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fade Away is not legal in pauper. I know i&#8217;m in 2012&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ACP</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/phormat-physics-pauper-ur-tronpost/comment-page-1/#comment-4112</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ACP]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 06:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=10760#comment-4112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like the deck a bit. Only thing i don&#039;t like is maindeck Flame Slash. There are better options. Sure they kill a lot of different threats but they don&#039;t take advantage of the mana engine.  I know the mana can come out slow at times but options like Wall of Tanglecord can solve that.  It just seems like the potentially least preforming card in the list. I&#039;d probably want a second capsize because capsize lock is always a viable win condition.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the deck a bit. Only thing i don&#8217;t like is maindeck Flame Slash. There are better options. Sure they kill a lot of different threats but they don&#8217;t take advantage of the mana engine.  I know the mana can come out slow at times but options like Wall of Tanglecord can solve that.  It just seems like the potentially least preforming card in the list. I&#8217;d probably want a second capsize because capsize lock is always a viable win condition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zage</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/phormat-physics-pauper-ur-tronpost/comment-page-1/#comment-3975</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zage]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 15:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=10760#comment-3975</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sounds like I need to just go ahead and test your list. Thanks for the information :D

Oh and good first article, keep it up! Pauper articles ftw!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like I need to just go ahead and test your list. Thanks for the information <img src="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif" alt=":D" class="wp-smiley" /> </p>
<p>Oh and good first article, keep it up! Pauper articles ftw!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noah Whinston</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/phormat-physics-pauper-ur-tronpost/comment-page-1/#comment-3974</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Noah Whinston]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 13:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=10760#comment-3974</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@zage: dissenting opinions are never bad :)

specifically against mono Blue i feel you should always have more counters. while they have more counterspells in their deck, with Mystical Teachings and Oona&#039;s Grace you should always have more in hand. i&#039;ve also never had trouble with paying enough mana for my finisher. i&#039;ll usually cast it around turn 15, with 5 posts out, leaving me able to thunder for 20 and still have 6-8 mana for counterspells.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@zage: dissenting opinions are never bad <img src="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" class="wp-smiley" /> </p>
<p>specifically against mono Blue i feel you should always have more counters. while they have more counterspells in their deck, with Mystical Teachings and Oona&#8217;s Grace you should always have more in hand. i&#8217;ve also never had trouble with paying enough mana for my finisher. i&#8217;ll usually cast it around turn 15, with 5 posts out, leaving me able to thunder for 20 and still have 6-8 mana for counterspells.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zage</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/phormat-physics-pauper-ur-tronpost/comment-page-1/#comment-3970</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zage]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 10:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=10760#comment-3970</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Noah: But it&#039;s likely they have more counters in their decks than you do. Also your finisher costs (lots of) mana, they don&#039;t need to pay mana for it. So you have a counter war where you start with more mana but also have to invest into the game-winning threat. Especially in the case of Rolling Thunder, that&#039;s going to be an enormous drain on your &#039;more mana than the opponent&#039;.
From the matches I&#039;ve played against MUC with my Cloudpost decks, if they&#039;re good and don&#039;t waste their counters I don&#039;t really have a shot because cloudpost is such a threat-light deck.

I&#039;m sure you&#039;ve had much more experience with the deck at actual tournaments though (I have none :p), so I&#039;m just trying to learn. Because as I said earlier, I love big mana decks and it would be great to find a brew that really works. I&#039;m just not sold on it&#039;s effectiveness yet. 

Oh I forgot to mention I did like the decklist + explanation and the tournament report. Nice and concise.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Noah: But it&#8217;s likely they have more counters in their decks than you do. Also your finisher costs (lots of) mana, they don&#8217;t need to pay mana for it. So you have a counter war where you start with more mana but also have to invest into the game-winning threat. Especially in the case of Rolling Thunder, that&#8217;s going to be an enormous drain on your &#8216;more mana than the opponent&#8217;.<br />
From the matches I&#8217;ve played against MUC with my Cloudpost decks, if they&#8217;re good and don&#8217;t waste their counters I don&#8217;t really have a shot because cloudpost is such a threat-light deck.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ve had much more experience with the deck at actual tournaments though (I have none :p), so I&#8217;m just trying to learn. Because as I said earlier, I love big mana decks and it would be great to find a brew that really works. I&#8217;m just not sold on it&#8217;s effectiveness yet. </p>
<p>Oh I forgot to mention I did like the decklist + explanation and the tournament report. Nice and concise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noah Whinston</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/phormat-physics-pauper-ur-tronpost/comment-page-1/#comment-3967</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Noah Whinston]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 22:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=10760#comment-3967</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@zage: cloudpost should dominate any control deck. the critical thing here is mana advantage. you will have more mana available after you cast a finisher than your opponent does, and because of this, you can counter more spells than they can. protecting your finisher]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@zage: cloudpost should dominate any control deck. the critical thing here is mana advantage. you will have more mana available after you cast a finisher than your opponent does, and because of this, you can counter more spells than they can. protecting your finisher</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zage</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/phormat-physics-pauper-ur-tronpost/comment-page-1/#comment-3964</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zage]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 19:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=10760#comment-3964</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love my casual Capsize Cloudpost deck in pauper and big mana decks in general, but I find playing against any control deck is just an excercise in futility.

How does this deck cope with opponents that know your deck and make sure to save a counter or two for these 4 cards (3x Rolling Thunder, 1x Ulamog&#039;s Crusher)?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love my casual Capsize Cloudpost deck in pauper and big mana decks in general, but I find playing against any control deck is just an excercise in futility.</p>
<p>How does this deck cope with opponents that know your deck and make sure to save a counter or two for these 4 cards (3x Rolling Thunder, 1x Ulamog&#8217;s Crusher)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
