<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 100%: Rec-Sur DeckTech</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/ramble-on-rec-sur-decktech/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/ramble-on-rec-sur-decktech/</link>
	<description>The prime source for Magic the Gathering strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2017 22:21:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Travis R. Chance</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/ramble-on-rec-sur-decktech/comment-page-1/#comment-295</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Travis R. Chance]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 13:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=4444#comment-295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, Combo is an odd one.  If I were to play Combo, I&#039;d go with Belcher.  Painter/Stone has Blessing as a foil that pretty much any player can pack, as well as being creature based, making is dually vulnerable to disruption.

I think Rec-Sur is dang solid, and can be taken a number of ways (none of which require Blue, I might add).  Not long ago I was quoted as saying Naya had the best averages in the format (if built right).  I am beginning to wonder if Rec-Sur may have stolen that illustrious moniker in these last few weeks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, Combo is an odd one.  If I were to play Combo, I&#8217;d go with Belcher.  Painter/Stone has Blessing as a foil that pretty much any player can pack, as well as being creature based, making is dually vulnerable to disruption.</p>
<p>I think Rec-Sur is dang solid, and can be taken a number of ways (none of which require Blue, I might add).  Not long ago I was quoted as saying Naya had the best averages in the format (if built right).  I am beginning to wonder if Rec-Sur may have stolen that illustrious moniker in these last few weeks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin Russell (RoninX)</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/ramble-on-rec-sur-decktech/comment-page-1/#comment-291</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robin Russell (RoninX)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 19:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=4444#comment-291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think I played a few matches vs. platipus10 (I think) who had Ideal in a control shell featuring walkers - that seemed very effective vs. my GWB build. Humility is just a beating vs. decks that rely heavily (though not exclusively) on utility creatures - and I just could seem to draw or force through non-creature answers to enchantments. If Rec-Sur becomes a major component of the meta then I could easily see a control/combo shell build that can tutor for such effective hate in the main deck starting to play a more significant role.

I also just played against a combo version that was also running cascade -&gt; hypergenesis along side the Ideal combo. I only got to play vs. that deck once, so maybe there were some god draws involved but I got comboed out on turn 5 vs. the &quot;Ideal&quot; hand and on turn 4 vs. the hypergenesis hand. Now, combo always looks invincible when it works and terrible when it doesn&#039;t but I was intrigued.

...of course I&#039;m still just getting my feet wet in this format, so take those thoughts for what they are worth.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I played a few matches vs. platipus10 (I think) who had Ideal in a control shell featuring walkers &#8211; that seemed very effective vs. my GWB build. Humility is just a beating vs. decks that rely heavily (though not exclusively) on utility creatures &#8211; and I just could seem to draw or force through non-creature answers to enchantments. If Rec-Sur becomes a major component of the meta then I could easily see a control/combo shell build that can tutor for such effective hate in the main deck starting to play a more significant role.</p>
<p>I also just played against a combo version that was also running cascade -&gt; hypergenesis along side the Ideal combo. I only got to play vs. that deck once, so maybe there were some god draws involved but I got comboed out on turn 5 vs. the &#8220;Ideal&#8221; hand and on turn 4 vs. the hypergenesis hand. Now, combo always looks invincible when it works and terrible when it doesn&#8217;t but I was intrigued.</p>
<p>&#8230;of course I&#8217;m still just getting my feet wet in this format, so take those thoughts for what they are worth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Travis R. Chance</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/ramble-on-rec-sur-decktech/comment-page-1/#comment-290</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Travis R. Chance]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 18:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=4444#comment-290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To date, I only know of one person who has attempted to play Ideal.  I briefly tinkered with it and it felt a lot like the Prison deck: a bat-belt style Combo deck replete with weird and often bad draws.  Perhaps it is an endeavor worth undertaking, but it hits too many of my &quot;no&quot; buttons for this format.  With regard to Belcher...  I didn&#039;t play any Belcher matchups this time around the bend.  Typically, I find this to be an easier match, like RDW or Gobbos; I feel like I slip into some sort of scar tissue armor and win by virtue of prior experience.

Also, I played THREE &quot;mirrors&quot; in fact (two Rec-Zur and one [card]Body Double[/card]/[card]Bile Urchin[/card]/[card]Reveillark[/card] combo).  The maindeck [card]Shred Memory[/card] was clutch.  I will say though, I was pretty lucky with my opening draws; I seemingly had Dirty Jesus or Survival every game.

I have been playing this build (with a few minor edits to the SB) in 2mans since arriving back home post-New Years and have lost like two matches in maybe twelve.  It&#039;s definitely a powerful deck, and the fact that it can just straight beat the crap out of you if it fails to hit the synergy is a nice failsafe.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To date, I only know of one person who has attempted to play Ideal.  I briefly tinkered with it and it felt a lot like the Prison deck: a bat-belt style Combo deck replete with weird and often bad draws.  Perhaps it is an endeavor worth undertaking, but it hits too many of my &#8220;no&#8221; buttons for this format.  With regard to Belcher&#8230;  I didn&#8217;t play any Belcher matchups this time around the bend.  Typically, I find this to be an easier match, like RDW or Gobbos; I feel like I slip into some sort of scar tissue armor and win by virtue of prior experience.</p>
<p>Also, I played THREE &#8220;mirrors&#8221; in fact (two Rec-Zur and one <a href="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/wp-content/plugins/mtgo-wp-mtg-helper/mtg_helper_cardfinder.php?find=Body+Double&width=223&height=310" class="jTip" name="Body Double">Body Double</a>/<a href="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/wp-content/plugins/mtgo-wp-mtg-helper/mtg_helper_cardfinder.php?find=Bile+Urchin&width=223&height=310" class="jTip" name="Bile Urchin">Bile Urchin</a>/<a href="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/wp-content/plugins/mtgo-wp-mtg-helper/mtg_helper_cardfinder.php?find=Reveillark&width=223&height=310" class="jTip" name="Reveillark">Reveillark</a> combo).  The maindeck <a href="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/wp-content/plugins/mtgo-wp-mtg-helper/mtg_helper_cardfinder.php?find=Shred+Memory&width=223&height=310" class="jTip" name="Shred Memory">Shred Memory</a> was clutch.  I will say though, I was pretty lucky with my opening draws; I seemingly had Dirty Jesus or Survival every game.</p>
<p>I have been playing this build (with a few minor edits to the SB) in 2mans since arriving back home post-New Years and have lost like two matches in maybe twelve.  It&#8217;s definitely a powerful deck, and the fact that it can just straight beat the crap out of you if it fails to hit the synergy is a nice failsafe.<img src='http://gatherer.wizards.com/Handlers/Image.ashx?size=small&type=card&name=Body Double&options=' style='display:none;width:1px;height:1px;' /><img src='http://gatherer.wizards.com/Handlers/Image.ashx?size=small&type=card&name=Bile Urchin&options=' style='display:none;width:1px;height:1px;' /><img src='http://gatherer.wizards.com/Handlers/Image.ashx?size=small&type=card&name=Reveillark&options=' style='display:none;width:1px;height:1px;' /><img src='http://gatherer.wizards.com/Handlers/Image.ashx?size=small&type=card&name=Shred Memory&options=' style='display:none;width:1px;height:1px;' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin Russell (RoninX)</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/ramble-on-rec-sur-decktech/comment-page-1/#comment-288</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robin Russell (RoninX)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 17:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=4444#comment-288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Too bad. As I work my way into 100CS, GWB was a natural draw (as a long time Rock/Junk enthusiast). My current version is more of a Rock build, aggro + disruption + armageddon effects will always be good times, but the Rec-Sur decks look like a blast.

It seems like the arrival of Survival on the scene has produced a definite shift in the meta, you mentioned a couple of times that you played 2 control (presumably base blue) matchups, and it sounded like you played at least two &quot;mirrors&quot; (were both GBwu though?) What about combo? Did you notice anyone playing Ideal or Belcher?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too bad. As I work my way into 100CS, GWB was a natural draw (as a long time Rock/Junk enthusiast). My current version is more of a Rock build, aggro + disruption + armageddon effects will always be good times, but the Rec-Sur decks look like a blast.</p>
<p>It seems like the arrival of Survival on the scene has produced a definite shift in the meta, you mentioned a couple of times that you played 2 control (presumably base blue) matchups, and it sounded like you played at least two &#8220;mirrors&#8221; (were both GBwu though?) What about combo? Did you notice anyone playing Ideal or Belcher?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Travis R. Chance</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/ramble-on-rec-sur-decktech/comment-page-1/#comment-284</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Travis R. Chance]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 00:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=4444#comment-284</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, RoninX!  Unfortunately, I do not have any playbacks- though I wish I did.  ChrisKool can attest, as he sat side-by-side with me like some gaunt conjoined twin, that my matches were quite entertaining.  I made this comment on the day (and I mean no disrespect to my opponent&#039;s): &quot;I felt like I was playing a Constructed deck vs. Sealed all day.&quot;  Wish I had something to share other than &quot;ya shoulda been there...&quot;  Sorry, my friend.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, RoninX!  Unfortunately, I do not have any playbacks- though I wish I did.  ChrisKool can attest, as he sat side-by-side with me like some gaunt conjoined twin, that my matches were quite entertaining.  I made this comment on the day (and I mean no disrespect to my opponent&#8217;s): &#8220;I felt like I was playing a Constructed deck vs. Sealed all day.&#8221;  Wish I had something to share other than &#8220;ya shoulda been there&#8230;&#8221;  Sorry, my friend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RoninX</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/ramble-on-rec-sur-decktech/comment-page-1/#comment-281</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RoninX]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 22:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=4444#comment-281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good stuff - did you save any of your match replays? I know I have suggested that people try there best to use &quot;live&quot; video whenever possible, but a replay is better than nothing. If you had any particularly interesting matches en route to your PE win I would be interested in checking them out.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good stuff &#8211; did you save any of your match replays? I know I have suggested that people try there best to use &#8220;live&#8221; video whenever possible, but a replay is better than nothing. If you had any particularly interesting matches en route to your PE win I would be interested in checking them out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Travis R. Chance</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/ramble-on-rec-sur-decktech/comment-page-1/#comment-266</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Travis R. Chance]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 19:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=4444#comment-266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ah.  Apologies, Bry!  Now I remember.  I must admit that I just sort of strapped on my helmet, said &quot;uh&quot; one thousand times, and hoped for the best.  May the pointy-eared hordes bring you much blood and Rath Cycle packs in 2010, my friend.

To plat:  Yeah, agreed, SoFI is just crazy when it works.  It&#039;s just those times that it doesn&#039;t that&#039;s the big turn off for me.  Greaves never feels like a let down in a format jam-packed with removal (some of which is obviously Red so...).  My longstanding theory on deck construction is composite synergy, not the &quot;good cards in these colors make the cut.&quot;  I tried Doran initially, but found that I wanted something that did a bit more.  If I was to play a dork, yes, I&#039;d rather it be [card]Call of the Herd[/card] (two dorks).  Purely a judgment call.  I think I mentioned that there was a few cards you could probably opt out: [card]Wall of Blossoms[/card] being suspect one (hate this card).  

Also, if you look at the curve, there&#039;s just soooooooo many three-drops.  It worked out this time, but obviously with only a single showing it&#039;s hard to say whether this was in fact the right call.  Good point though.

DOWN WITH SoFI!!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah.  Apologies, Bry!  Now I remember.  I must admit that I just sort of strapped on my helmet, said &#8220;uh&#8221; one thousand times, and hoped for the best.  May the pointy-eared hordes bring you much blood and Rath Cycle packs in 2010, my friend.</p>
<p>To plat:  Yeah, agreed, SoFI is just crazy when it works.  It&#8217;s just those times that it doesn&#8217;t that&#8217;s the big turn off for me.  Greaves never feels like a let down in a format jam-packed with removal (some of which is obviously Red so&#8230;).  My longstanding theory on deck construction is composite synergy, not the &#8220;good cards in these colors make the cut.&#8221;  I tried Doran initially, but found that I wanted something that did a bit more.  If I was to play a dork, yes, I&#8217;d rather it be <a href="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/wp-content/plugins/mtgo-wp-mtg-helper/mtg_helper_cardfinder.php?find=Call+of+the+Herd&width=223&height=310" class="jTip" name="Call of the Herd">Call of the Herd</a> (two dorks).  Purely a judgment call.  I think I mentioned that there was a few cards you could probably opt out: <a href="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/wp-content/plugins/mtgo-wp-mtg-helper/mtg_helper_cardfinder.php?find=Wall+of+Blossoms&width=223&height=310" class="jTip" name="Wall of Blossoms">Wall of Blossoms</a> being suspect one (hate this card).  </p>
<p>Also, if you look at the curve, there&#8217;s just soooooooo many three-drops.  It worked out this time, but obviously with only a single showing it&#8217;s hard to say whether this was in fact the right call.  Good point though.</p>
<p>DOWN WITH SoFI!!!!<img src='http://gatherer.wizards.com/Handlers/Image.ashx?size=small&type=card&name=Call of the Herd&options=' style='display:none;width:1px;height:1px;' /><img src='http://gatherer.wizards.com/Handlers/Image.ashx?size=small&type=card&name=Wall of Blossoms&options=' style='display:none;width:1px;height:1px;' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
