<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rhythmik Study: Underextending</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/rhythmik-study-underextending/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/rhythmik-study-underextending/</link>
	<description>The prime source for Magic the Gathering strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2017 22:21:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neros</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/rhythmik-study-underextending/comment-page-1/#comment-2110</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neros]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 02:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=8177#comment-2110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m kind of looking forward to this new extended mainly cause its got all the sets I played in more competitively and have plenty of cards in.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m kind of looking forward to this new extended mainly cause its got all the sets I played in more competitively and have plenty of cards in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Milkshake75</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/rhythmik-study-underextending/comment-page-1/#comment-1715</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Milkshake75]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 23:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=8177#comment-1715</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fae was a good deck, but if you remember your standard meta game fae was eaten alive by Boat brew and BW tokens and lets not forget my personal favorite GW tokens.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fae was a good deck, but if you remember your standard meta game fae was eaten alive by Boat brew and BW tokens and lets not forget my personal favorite GW tokens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeph Foster</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/rhythmik-study-underextending/comment-page-1/#comment-1713</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeph Foster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 18:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=8177#comment-1713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@phfantom. I&#039;m actually going to start buying up Ravnica Shocklands while they are in the tanks. MaRo actually said a few years ago that the reason the Shocklands had generic names was so they could be reprinted in the future.  If you get them when they all hit ~$3-5, I&#039;m sure you&#039;ll be pleasantly surprised.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@phfantom. I&#8217;m actually going to start buying up Ravnica Shocklands while they are in the tanks. MaRo actually said a few years ago that the reason the Shocklands had generic names was so they could be reprinted in the future.  If you get them when they all hit ~$3-5, I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ll be pleasantly surprised.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: akujin</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/rhythmik-study-underextending/comment-page-1/#comment-1712</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[akujin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 18:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=8177#comment-1712</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I really like this new format and my shop might be having extended tournies now because people can just play their standard decks with only a few changes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like this new format and my shop might be having extended tournies now because people can just play their standard decks with only a few changes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phfantom</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/rhythmik-study-underextending/comment-page-1/#comment-1711</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[phfantom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 16:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=8177#comment-1711</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i think Fae will be back in force, but I honestly don&#039;t think it will be the best deck, just the one there in the biggest quantity. Now to win myself a PTQ so I can make a monstrosity to beat Fae as well.

Well written, and I hope you&#039;re right there&#039;s going to be a &quot;new format&quot; so that my 4 year ago investment in Ravnica Shocks doesn&#039;t stay in the tanks]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think Fae will be back in force, but I honestly don&#8217;t think it will be the best deck, just the one there in the biggest quantity. Now to win myself a PTQ so I can make a monstrosity to beat Fae as well.</p>
<p>Well written, and I hope you&#8217;re right there&#8217;s going to be a &#8220;new format&#8221; so that my 4 year ago investment in Ravnica Shocks doesn&#8217;t stay in the tanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ShardFenix</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/rhythmik-study-underextending/comment-page-1/#comment-1709</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShardFenix]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 15:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=8177#comment-1709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bah..i dont play standard so i never bothered to buy any of the cards from recent standard deck so this sucks.

And I am really wondering why everyone keeps bringing up this Overextended format...it was an idea over on mtgsalvation...nothing wotc ever actually said]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bah..i dont play standard so i never bothered to buy any of the cards from recent standard deck so this sucks.</p>
<p>And I am really wondering why everyone keeps bringing up this Overextended format&#8230;it was an idea over on mtgsalvation&#8230;nothing wotc ever actually said</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeph Foster</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/rhythmik-study-underextending/comment-page-1/#comment-1707</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeph Foster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 14:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=8177#comment-1707</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I do not believe Fae will be as good as people are saying will be. I do know, however, know that many people will be running Fae, and picking up these cards for your collection are great bets.

In Amsterdam, I&#039;ll be playing something that beats Fae.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not believe Fae will be as good as people are saying will be. I do know, however, know that many people will be running Fae, and picking up these cards for your collection are great bets.</p>
<p>In Amsterdam, I&#8217;ll be playing something that beats Fae.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
