<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Standard Spike: Burning Vengeance in Standard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/standard-burning-vengeance-in-standard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/standard-burning-vengeance-in-standard/</link>
	<description>The prime source for Magic the Gathering strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2017 22:21:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: AuranAlchemist</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/standard-burning-vengeance-in-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-6340</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AuranAlchemist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 16:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=14339#comment-6340</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Round 1 G3 you could have ancient grudged his token, snapped back the doomblade to deal 2 at the splicer and blade the hero. This would have saved you mana the following turn and let you just flashback spells. I can see how it&#039;s easy to lose track of these interactions which makes me like the deck. lol

Also it&#039;s easy to forget that just because you target with Extraction that mtgo doesn&#039;t take it out of the graveyard. It&#039;s super tilting when you realize the flashback deck still gets their flashback spells because of that. :(]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Round 1 G3 you could have ancient grudged his token, snapped back the doomblade to deal 2 at the splicer and blade the hero. This would have saved you mana the following turn and let you just flashback spells. I can see how it&#8217;s easy to lose track of these interactions which makes me like the deck. lol</p>
<p>Also it&#8217;s easy to forget that just because you target with Extraction that mtgo doesn&#8217;t take it out of the graveyard. It&#8217;s super tilting when you realize the flashback deck still gets their flashback spells because of that. <img src="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif" alt=":(" class="wp-smiley" /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: areign</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/standard-burning-vengeance-in-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-6328</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[areign]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 17:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=14339#comment-6328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[in game 2 match 1, had you flashed in smapcaster mage on the turn before playing slagstorm you could have traded it and killed a traveler and then the slagstorm could have killed all but one token. especially being that he played the spellbomb and you weren&#039;t going to get anything good out of the snapcaster.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in game 2 match 1, had you flashed in smapcaster mage on the turn before playing slagstorm you could have traded it and killed a traveler and then the slagstorm could have killed all but one token. especially being that he played the spellbomb and you weren&#8217;t going to get anything good out of the snapcaster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheCable</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/standard-burning-vengeance-in-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-6315</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TheCable]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 12:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=14339#comment-6315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Woohoo! There&#039;s not enough constructed content on the net, glad to this come out so fast]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woohoo! There&#8217;s not enough constructed content on the net, glad to this come out so fast</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: milegyenanevem</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/standard-burning-vengeance-in-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-6314</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[milegyenanevem]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 10:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=14339#comment-6314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I really wonder what you can do against a really fast deck...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really wonder what you can do against a really fast deck&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oprah</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/standard-burning-vengeance-in-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-6313</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oprah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 03:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=14339#comment-6313</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like Turtles]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Turtles</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pekka</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/standard-burning-vengeance-in-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-6302</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pekka]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 08:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=14339#comment-6302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Match 3, Game 3: HE was referring to you having Mana Leak for Lashwrithe on the last turn, which you did. He would have won if you had leaked it, so well played with the Grudge!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Match 3, Game 3: HE was referring to you having Mana Leak for Lashwrithe on the last turn, which you did. He would have won if you had leaked it, so well played with the Grudge!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/standard-burning-vengeance-in-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-6301</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 08:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=14339#comment-6301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[dat sound at the end of round 3

so you&#039;re really just dead to thrun or anything with shroud

was really hoping to see a match against red. how do you sideboard in that matchup?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dat sound at the end of round 3</p>
<p>so you&#8217;re really just dead to thrun or anything with shroud</p>
<p>was really hoping to see a match against red. how do you sideboard in that matchup?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
