<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Standard Spike: Black-Red Vamps</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/standard-spike-black-red-vamps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/standard-spike-black-red-vamps/</link>
	<description>The prime source for Magic the Gathering strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2017 22:21:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: _ShipItHolla</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/standard-spike-black-red-vamps/comment-page-1/#comment-4754</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[_ShipItHolla]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 22:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=12473#comment-4754</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@BANE: Good point!

@milegyenanevem: I think I had a Gatekeeper or another removal spell in hand. Otherwise, I would probably attack there.

@drn: I actually forgot to include Captivating Vampire, which I like as a 1-2 of. Personally, I&#039;ve disliked playing aginst Vampires with CawBlade, but if the deck is built well it&#039;s probably not a bad matchup after all.

Yeah, there should be 1-2 Vandals/Crushes, especially to compete with Batterskull in the future.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@BANE: Good point!</p>
<p>@milegyenanevem: I think I had a Gatekeeper or another removal spell in hand. Otherwise, I would probably attack there.</p>
<p>@drn: I actually forgot to include Captivating Vampire, which I like as a 1-2 of. Personally, I&#8217;ve disliked playing aginst Vampires with CawBlade, but if the deck is built well it&#8217;s probably not a bad matchup after all.</p>
<p>Yeah, there should be 1-2 Vandals/Crushes, especially to compete with Batterskull in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wesleyjboyd</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/standard-spike-black-red-vamps/comment-page-1/#comment-4745</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wesleyjboyd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 00:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=12473#comment-4745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Congrats on your &quot;Q&quot;!  Hard work pays off!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congrats on your &#8220;Q&#8221;!  Hard work pays off!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheCable</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/standard-spike-black-red-vamps/comment-page-1/#comment-4744</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TheCable]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 May 2011 16:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=12473#comment-4744</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great videos. Vamps definitely are slightly underpowered. No good mythic rare to boost its overall power level still makes it a dog to caw-blade.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great videos. Vamps definitely are slightly underpowered. No good mythic rare to boost its overall power level still makes it a dog to caw-blade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drn</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/standard-spike-black-red-vamps/comment-page-1/#comment-4743</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[drn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 May 2011 00:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=12473#comment-4743</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I never liked Vampires due to the lack of good lords and the weakness to pyroclasm.  I play caw-blade and I love getting paired vs Vampires, and post board is even better.  I know I prefer 1 Hero of Bladehold and 1 Sun Titan maindeck, but people are now running multiple Emeria Angels which seem awesome vs Vamps.

Having played it a fair amount (Testing only, I hate tribal decks) I found 1 Manic Vandal maindeck to be great, since your deck is nothing but crappy 2/2s and you play 0 artifacts, not to mention you can scry him away if need be.  I also prefer it to crush in the board, they don&#039;t even use sword until they are stabilized so crush is only good vs Boros, and Vandel is fine there too.

Anyone who is thinking of playing this, switch Demon of Death&#039;s Gate with Mark of Mutiny, which not only combos with Viscera Seer, but is good vs Valakut and RUG (Valakut will beat you regardless of your board plan, they are heavily favored pre and post board).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never liked Vampires due to the lack of good lords and the weakness to pyroclasm.  I play caw-blade and I love getting paired vs Vampires, and post board is even better.  I know I prefer 1 Hero of Bladehold and 1 Sun Titan maindeck, but people are now running multiple Emeria Angels which seem awesome vs Vamps.</p>
<p>Having played it a fair amount (Testing only, I hate tribal decks) I found 1 Manic Vandal maindeck to be great, since your deck is nothing but crappy 2/2s and you play 0 artifacts, not to mention you can scry him away if need be.  I also prefer it to crush in the board, they don&#8217;t even use sword until they are stabilized so crush is only good vs Boros, and Vandel is fine there too.</p>
<p>Anyone who is thinking of playing this, switch Demon of Death&#8217;s Gate with Mark of Mutiny, which not only combos with Viscera Seer, but is good vs Valakut and RUG (Valakut will beat you regardless of your board plan, they are heavily favored pre and post board).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dougf</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/standard-spike-black-red-vamps/comment-page-1/#comment-4742</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dougf]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 May 2011 00:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=12473#comment-4742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[absolutely love how you play. keep making content, and tell so many trolls that we don&#039;t hate him.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>absolutely love how you play. keep making content, and tell so many trolls that we don&#8217;t hate him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fifthchild</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/standard-spike-black-red-vamps/comment-page-1/#comment-4740</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fifthchild]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 18:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=12473#comment-4740</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did every game open with Stoneforge Mystic? Or just almost all of them? Yeah, the variety is slaying me.

Can&#039;t fault the players though, they&#039;re gonna follow the good cards. Seems out of place seeing the same opening from the premier control and aggro decks, though.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did every game open with Stoneforge Mystic? Or just almost all of them? Yeah, the variety is slaying me.</p>
<p>Can&#8217;t fault the players though, they&#8217;re gonna follow the good cards. Seems out of place seeing the same opening from the premier control and aggro decks, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PlanetWalls</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/standard-spike-black-red-vamps/comment-page-1/#comment-4739</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PlanetWalls]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 18:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=12473#comment-4739</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[milegy: I don&#039;t recall his exact explanation, but he did reason out that decision.  Watching his videos with the sound on is definitely worthwhile.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>milegy: I don&#8217;t recall his exact explanation, but he did reason out that decision.  Watching his videos with the sound on is definitely worthwhile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
