<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Standard Spike: Green is good.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/standard-spike-green-is-good/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/standard-spike-green-is-good/</link>
	<description>The prime source for Magic the Gathering strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2017 22:21:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: zac</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/standard-spike-green-is-good/comment-page-1/#comment-3328</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[zac]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Oct 2010 10:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=9845#comment-3328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think it was pretty cool of you to tell the new player
why he couldn&#039;t target Garruk I know the first time i played against
a planeswalker on mtgo i was confused...  

Anyways,  i think your build was fine. 5 mountains seem sufficent you only had 5 red
cards 3 of which were double red, but  with 2 cultivates and a sylvan ranger 5 seems fine
Your also trying to hit double green most of the time anyways... 16 lands seems pretty good to me
especially considering you have 2 cultivates a ranger and a Llanowar. 

However, the sword is awkward with only 13 creatures. maybe not in general a draft deck
has 15 to 16 creatures so maybe its not bad... anyways great job with the videos, and I can&#039;t wait for the standard vids]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it was pretty cool of you to tell the new player<br />
why he couldn&#8217;t target Garruk I know the first time i played against<br />
a planeswalker on mtgo i was confused&#8230;  </p>
<p>Anyways,  i think your build was fine. 5 mountains seem sufficent you only had 5 red<br />
cards 3 of which were double red, but  with 2 cultivates and a sylvan ranger 5 seems fine<br />
Your also trying to hit double green most of the time anyways&#8230; 16 lands seems pretty good to me<br />
especially considering you have 2 cultivates a ranger and a Llanowar. </p>
<p>However, the sword is awkward with only 13 creatures. maybe not in general a draft deck<br />
has 15 to 16 creatures so maybe its not bad&#8230; anyways great job with the videos, and I can&#8217;t wait for the standard vids</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hovertical</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/standard-spike-green-is-good/comment-page-1/#comment-3245</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hovertical]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 10:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=9845#comment-3245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In R1 G1, on the fireball play wouldnt it have been better to tap out wipe his field and deal him 3 damage so you could deal 8 damage that turn?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In R1 G1, on the fireball play wouldnt it have been better to tap out wipe his field and deal him 3 damage so you could deal 8 damage that turn?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: masterofbrine</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/standard-spike-green-is-good/comment-page-1/#comment-3238</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[masterofbrine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 01:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=9845#comment-3238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Love the draft videos. cannot wait for more. Preferably SOM]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love the draft videos. cannot wait for more. Preferably SOM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ghettofetto</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/standard-spike-green-is-good/comment-page-1/#comment-3219</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ghettofetto]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Oct 2010 17:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=9845#comment-3219</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Spined Wurm &gt; Greater Basilisk &gt; Duskdale Wurm for your deck. 2 Acidic Slimes take care of your overcosted deathtouch creature quotient. Playing 16 land with a 7 drop seems greedy, even with a the elves and the cultivates. Having a Crystal Ball is a reason to play more lands, not less, since it allows your to minimize your odds of mana screw AND allows you to ship excess lands to the bottom. 

Nature&#039;s Spiral is SB material and is certainly not needed in multiples. Your curve is very high and you have so few early drops, I feel you built a deck that is very vulnerable to mono W aggro. 

5 Mountains with 3 Chandra Outrage is greedy.

It&#039;s also worth mentioning that with Sword of Vengeance you decided to only run 13 creatures, several of which are 5+ drops.

Just seems like a very suboptimal build that really leaves you wide open to awkward mulligan decisions.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spined Wurm &gt; Greater Basilisk &gt; Duskdale Wurm for your deck. 2 Acidic Slimes take care of your overcosted deathtouch creature quotient. Playing 16 land with a 7 drop seems greedy, even with a the elves and the cultivates. Having a Crystal Ball is a reason to play more lands, not less, since it allows your to minimize your odds of mana screw AND allows you to ship excess lands to the bottom. </p>
<p>Nature&#8217;s Spiral is SB material and is certainly not needed in multiples. Your curve is very high and you have so few early drops, I feel you built a deck that is very vulnerable to mono W aggro. </p>
<p>5 Mountains with 3 Chandra Outrage is greedy.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also worth mentioning that with Sword of Vengeance you decided to only run 13 creatures, several of which are 5+ drops.</p>
<p>Just seems like a very suboptimal build that really leaves you wide open to awkward mulligan decisions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sin_plague</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/standard-spike-green-is-good/comment-page-1/#comment-3200</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sin_plague]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 19:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=9845#comment-3200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[btw... ryan cribbs? he has crabbs...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>btw&#8230; ryan cribbs? he has crabbs&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sin_plague</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/standard-spike-green-is-good/comment-page-1/#comment-3199</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sin_plague]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 19:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=9845#comment-3199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i sided in double demon&#039;s horn against shahar because he was heavy black, i was w/b... and i had double ajani&#039;s pridemate...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i sided in double demon&#8217;s horn against shahar because he was heavy black, i was w/b&#8230; and i had double ajani&#8217;s pridemate&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: _ShipItHolla</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/standard-spike-green-is-good/comment-page-1/#comment-3198</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[_ShipItHolla]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 17:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=9845#comment-3198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t know exactly what you mean Wyrath, but in any case, I was rather hasty to make a decision on SOM Limited. I still don&#039;t like it too much but I have found that drafting it is not so bad. Sealed seems to be dominated by whoever has the best infect deck, but in draft infect is over-drafted and is less of a problem.

Next time I&#039;ll be covering a SOM Sealed with it being just released and all, but I will probably start doing constructed after that. UW isn&#039;t something I particularly want to play right now but we&#039;ll see where I stand in 3 weeks.

We definitely made some mistakes in the draft (and got rewarded at times). It&#039;s kinda fair that we lost the finals after all that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know exactly what you mean Wyrath, but in any case, I was rather hasty to make a decision on SOM Limited. I still don&#8217;t like it too much but I have found that drafting it is not so bad. Sealed seems to be dominated by whoever has the best infect deck, but in draft infect is over-drafted and is less of a problem.</p>
<p>Next time I&#8217;ll be covering a SOM Sealed with it being just released and all, but I will probably start doing constructed after that. UW isn&#8217;t something I particularly want to play right now but we&#8217;ll see where I stand in 3 weeks.</p>
<p>We definitely made some mistakes in the draft (and got rewarded at times). It&#8217;s kinda fair that we lost the finals after all that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
