<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Standard Spike: Modern PTQ with UW Control</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/standard-spike-modern-ptq-with-uw-control/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/standard-spike-modern-ptq-with-uw-control/</link>
	<description>The prime source for Magic the Gathering strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2017 22:21:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChrisKool</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/standard-spike-modern-ptq-with-uw-control/comment-page-1/#comment-7124</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ChrisKool]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:23:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=15050#comment-7124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I played versus UW twice, and the Cryptics were wonderful in the MU (UW v Project Melira). The tap all creatures opponent controls is just as scary as the countermagic after you&#039;ve been pecked by Hawks and Haunt tokens. I&#039;m interested in playing the deck some; it seems fun for those that like to grind out their win turn by turn.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I played versus UW twice, and the Cryptics were wonderful in the MU (UW v Project Melira). The tap all creatures opponent controls is just as scary as the countermagic after you&#8217;ve been pecked by Hawks and Haunt tokens. I&#8217;m interested in playing the deck some; it seems fun for those that like to grind out their win turn by turn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drew</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/standard-spike-modern-ptq-with-uw-control/comment-page-1/#comment-7117</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Drew]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 04:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=15050#comment-7117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Almost got there...

http://www.wizards.com/Magic/Digital/MagicOnlineTourn.aspx?x=mtg/digital/magiconline/tourn/3290352]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Almost got there&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.wizards.com/Magic/Digital/MagicOnlineTourn.aspx?x=mtg/digital/magiconline/tourn/3290352" rel="nofollow">http://www.wizards.com/Magic/Digital/MagicOnlineTourn.aspx?x=mtg/digital/magiconline/tourn/3290352</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: _ShipItHolla</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/standard-spike-modern-ptq-with-uw-control/comment-page-1/#comment-7115</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[_ShipItHolla]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 21:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=15050#comment-7115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The sound from the livestreamed matches is very low and I&#039;m really sorry about that. I thought for sure my settings were good, but I was being defaulted to my computer&#039;s mic, which is very poor. My settings should be accurate for future streams though.

@Drew, Cryptics aren&#039;t great in a lot of decks, but this one can put enough pressure on the board that the card is actually good. It also plays enough mana sources that Snapcasting it is a realistic possibility and since you&#039;re still a control deck you can usually keep control of the game to the point where Cryptic makes for a reasonable counterspell except against the most aggressive decks and the one with Vial.

Wrath and Gideon are too expensive and narrow to be maindecked in this format. I&#039;m okay with adding another Wrath to the board because of the Merfolk Menace, but not so much in the MD.

Playing a third color sacrifices a lot. You lose the manlands and the mana stability. If you want to go that route you&#039;re probably better off with UB Delver.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sound from the livestreamed matches is very low and I&#8217;m really sorry about that. I thought for sure my settings were good, but I was being defaulted to my computer&#8217;s mic, which is very poor. My settings should be accurate for future streams though.</p>
<p>@Drew, Cryptics aren&#8217;t great in a lot of decks, but this one can put enough pressure on the board that the card is actually good. It also plays enough mana sources that Snapcasting it is a realistic possibility and since you&#8217;re still a control deck you can usually keep control of the game to the point where Cryptic makes for a reasonable counterspell except against the most aggressive decks and the one with Vial.</p>
<p>Wrath and Gideon are too expensive and narrow to be maindecked in this format. I&#8217;m okay with adding another Wrath to the board because of the Merfolk Menace, but not so much in the MD.</p>
<p>Playing a third color sacrifices a lot. You lose the manlands and the mana stability. If you want to go that route you&#8217;re probably better off with UB Delver.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drew</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/standard-spike-modern-ptq-with-uw-control/comment-page-1/#comment-7114</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Drew]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 20:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=15050#comment-7114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cryptics are just awful. Maybe Mana Leaks? Add a Wrath main in place of some Cryptics or jam a couple Gideons? 

Actually now that I think of it you should try Esper Blade. Inquisition/Thoughtsieze and Doom Blade/Deathmarks/Smother in the board would help so much. Right now the UW is mediocre at best.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cryptics are just awful. Maybe Mana Leaks? Add a Wrath main in place of some Cryptics or jam a couple Gideons? </p>
<p>Actually now that I think of it you should try Esper Blade. Inquisition/Thoughtsieze and Doom Blade/Deathmarks/Smother in the board would help so much. Right now the UW is mediocre at best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PlanetWalls</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/standard-spike-modern-ptq-with-uw-control/comment-page-1/#comment-7111</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PlanetWalls]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 07:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=15050#comment-7111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everything should be working now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everything should be working now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shrip</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/standard-spike-modern-ptq-with-uw-control/comment-page-1/#comment-7110</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[shrip]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 05:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=15050#comment-7110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[tried watching it on your twitchtv but the sound is impossible to hear even when i put it up all the way]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tried watching it on your twitchtv but the sound is impossible to hear even when i put it up all the way</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joey</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/standard-spike-modern-ptq-with-uw-control/comment-page-1/#comment-7109</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 05:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=15050#comment-7109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These videos are not working. Round one is the deck tech from the fish deck.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These videos are not working. Round one is the deck tech from the fish deck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
