<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Standard Spike: Puresteel In Standard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/standard-spike-puresteel-in-standard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/standard-spike-puresteel-in-standard/</link>
	<description>The prime source for Magic the Gathering strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2017 22:21:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheCable</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/standard-spike-puresteel-in-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-6432</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TheCable]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 16:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=14390#comment-6432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Definitely ran slightly under EV, but whatever&#039;s the case, deck seems a bit too unfocused. Virtues are really low impact and are really only acceptable with haunting. I&#039;m the guy who likes cute synergetic interactions more than anything, but it feels like doing all these things in the same deck just won&#039;t work on consistent basis.

Really sweet videos anyway]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely ran slightly under EV, but whatever&#8217;s the case, deck seems a bit too unfocused. Virtues are really low impact and are really only acceptable with haunting. I&#8217;m the guy who likes cute synergetic interactions more than anything, but it feels like doing all these things in the same deck just won&#8217;t work on consistent basis.</p>
<p>Really sweet videos anyway</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/standard-spike-puresteel-in-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-6409</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 11:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=14390#comment-6409</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[really enjoy the vids. you make some stupid mistakes sometimes, but i think apart from that you play constructed better than anyone i have seen.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>really enjoy the vids. you make some stupid mistakes sometimes, but i think apart from that you play constructed better than anyone i have seen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: _ShipItHolla</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/standard-spike-puresteel-in-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-6400</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[_ShipItHolla]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 18:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=14390#comment-6400</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I played the deck once more with a few changes and have decided that Preordain was more important to the deck than I realized. I actually think the deck could be good right now, but it has been too inconsistent for me.

@Rick, I was contemplating playing that deck anyways so that will probably be my choice.

@moerutora, I appreciate hearing that :) Mentor isn&#039;t bad at all, but it&#039;s not exactly what the deck wants to be doing. It&#039;s kinda the opposite of Puresteel Paladin (Paladin generates virtual mana and free cards, Mentor eats up mana and generates cards at a cost, one is compellingly fast, the other very slow).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I played the deck once more with a few changes and have decided that Preordain was more important to the deck than I realized. I actually think the deck could be good right now, but it has been too inconsistent for me.</p>
<p>@Rick, I was contemplating playing that deck anyways so that will probably be my choice.</p>
<p>@moerutora, I appreciate hearing that <img src="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" class="wp-smiley" />  Mentor isn&#8217;t bad at all, but it&#8217;s not exactly what the deck wants to be doing. It&#8217;s kinda the opposite of Puresteel Paladin (Paladin generates virtual mana and free cards, Mentor eats up mana and generates cards at a cost, one is compellingly fast, the other very slow).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moerutora</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/standard-spike-puresteel-in-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-6399</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[moerutora]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 18:36:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=14390#comment-6399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank You for this. I was thinking of playing this deck a couple of weeks ago but with Mentor added although Im not too sure if I want to play standard atm. As for suggestions- Sorins Vengeance.dek would be fun.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank You for this. I was thinking of playing this deck a couple of weeks ago but with Mentor added although Im not too sure if I want to play standard atm. As for suggestions- Sorins Vengeance.dek would be fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/standard-spike-puresteel-in-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-6392</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 09:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=14390#comment-6392</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I really love this series, thank you so much for making these videos!

I vote for U/w Illusions next week, that Todd Anderson just wrote about on SCG.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really love this series, thank you so much for making these videos!</p>
<p>I vote for U/w Illusions next week, that Todd Anderson just wrote about on SCG.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChrisKool</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/standard-spike-puresteel-in-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-6383</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ChrisKool]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 02:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=14390#comment-6383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I tried this Puresteel list and fell prey to mana issues more often than I cared for. 

I really want Puresteel to work; drawing cards in non-blue decks is fun :(]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried this Puresteel list and fell prey to mana issues more often than I cared for. </p>
<p>I really want Puresteel to work; drawing cards in non-blue decks is fun <img src="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif" alt=":(" class="wp-smiley" /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
