<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Standard Spike: RG in Innistrad Block Constructed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/standard-spike-rg-in-innistrad-block-constructed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/standard-spike-rg-in-innistrad-block-constructed/</link>
	<description>The prime source for Magic the Gathering strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2017 22:21:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/standard-spike-rg-in-innistrad-block-constructed/comment-page-1/#comment-8590</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 22:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=16173#comment-8590</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Also.

Threw this deck together and played it a bit this week. I really enjoyed it. The only decks I had trouble with were UG dredge decks in testing. Your best card against them is a flipped garruk and sometimes he basically wins by himself, but when he didn&#039;t (or you couldn&#039;t bum rush them) all your reach was easily negated by gnaws and your creatures outclassed. Now UG still isn&#039;t much of the competitive format, but I was wondering about thoughts on shoring up the matchup, because two threatens didn&#039;t seem to do it for me.

Finally, Vorrapede has really underwhelmed. The mirror seems to be decided to a much greater degree by who draws their burn (volley to win huntmaster wars and DP to go to the dome). Though I haven&#039;t played the true mirror at all, but mainly against the RG Vorrapede/slime decks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also.</p>
<p>Threw this deck together and played it a bit this week. I really enjoyed it. The only decks I had trouble with were UG dredge decks in testing. Your best card against them is a flipped garruk and sometimes he basically wins by himself, but when he didn&#8217;t (or you couldn&#8217;t bum rush them) all your reach was easily negated by gnaws and your creatures outclassed. Now UG still isn&#8217;t much of the competitive format, but I was wondering about thoughts on shoring up the matchup, because two threatens didn&#8217;t seem to do it for me.</p>
<p>Finally, Vorrapede has really underwhelmed. The mirror seems to be decided to a much greater degree by who draws their burn (volley to win huntmaster wars and DP to go to the dome). Though I haven&#8217;t played the true mirror at all, but mainly against the RG Vorrapede/slime decks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/standard-spike-rg-in-innistrad-block-constructed/comment-page-1/#comment-8589</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 22:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=16173#comment-8589</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The problem with bramblecrush is the same that creeping molds have always had, and usually suffered from: they are expensive and slow and rarely impact the board. Sure, getting a &#039;walker with bramble crush is good. But even discussing that best case scenario: unless you are already ahead on the board you still fall behind on the trade. The current format is largely defined by a frenetic early game* capped by 4 drops where losing your 4th turn to undo the damage of a planeswalker can cost you enough tempo to lose in short order. Is there a place for Bramblecrush in SBs? I keep thinking so, and then I keep ending up cutting them.

*which gives way to a grindy middle game, and late game that sees huge life swings from devil&#039;s play/gnaw etc.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with bramblecrush is the same that creeping molds have always had, and usually suffered from: they are expensive and slow and rarely impact the board. Sure, getting a &#8216;walker with bramble crush is good. But even discussing that best case scenario: unless you are already ahead on the board you still fall behind on the trade. The current format is largely defined by a frenetic early game* capped by 4 drops where losing your 4th turn to undo the damage of a planeswalker can cost you enough tempo to lose in short order. Is there a place for Bramblecrush in SBs? I keep thinking so, and then I keep ending up cutting them.</p>
<p>*which gives way to a grindy middle game, and late game that sees huge life swings from devil&#8217;s play/gnaw etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/standard-spike-rg-in-innistrad-block-constructed/comment-page-1/#comment-8578</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 12:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=16173#comment-8578</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Concerning Bramblecrush, this was alluded to but not stated outright and I think it&#039;s important: it&#039;s *any* non-creature permanent, meaning you can destroy planeswalkers. I haven&#039;t played block since the Lingering souls/Intangible Virtue ban so I&#039;m guessing that&#039;s not as relevant as it used to be, but it does greatly increase the chance of it not being a dead card against certain decks.

 It can also be used to destroy a land, which I&#039;m sure will be extremely relevant once AVR hits. The boros land is going to be a house, admittedly it makes the mana even more difficult than it is already, but I think the upside far outweighs its downsides. Then there&#039;s of course the loothouse and refuge, though I don&#039;t see an obvious home for refuge yet. 

Lets not forget Tamiyo (or possibly even Tibalt) either. That&#039;s a lot of new cards (and I haven&#039;t even covered the artifacts/enchantments) that get hit by bramblecrush. The versatility and the fact that it&#039;s never *completely* dead (since it can take out a land) makes it something I&#039;ll definitely want in any green sideboard once AVR rotates in.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Concerning Bramblecrush, this was alluded to but not stated outright and I think it&#8217;s important: it&#8217;s *any* non-creature permanent, meaning you can destroy planeswalkers. I haven&#8217;t played block since the Lingering souls/Intangible Virtue ban so I&#8217;m guessing that&#8217;s not as relevant as it used to be, but it does greatly increase the chance of it not being a dead card against certain decks.</p>
<p> It can also be used to destroy a land, which I&#8217;m sure will be extremely relevant once AVR hits. The boros land is going to be a house, admittedly it makes the mana even more difficult than it is already, but I think the upside far outweighs its downsides. Then there&#8217;s of course the loothouse and refuge, though I don&#8217;t see an obvious home for refuge yet. </p>
<p>Lets not forget Tamiyo (or possibly even Tibalt) either. That&#8217;s a lot of new cards (and I haven&#8217;t even covered the artifacts/enchantments) that get hit by bramblecrush. The versatility and the fact that it&#8217;s never *completely* dead (since it can take out a land) makes it something I&#8217;ll definitely want in any green sideboard once AVR rotates in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Butthead</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/standard-spike-rg-in-innistrad-block-constructed/comment-page-1/#comment-8571</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Butthead]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=16173#comment-8571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Also here are more lines of play that I am sure that you considered, but I just want people to think I am smart (even though I anonymously posted this)...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also here are more lines of play that I am sure that you considered, but I just want people to think I am smart (even though I anonymously posted this)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Disco</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/standard-spike-rg-in-innistrad-block-constructed/comment-page-1/#comment-8566</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Disco]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 08:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=16173#comment-8566</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That damn furor deck is really no different than the ancient Unholy Strength/Unstable Mutation/Serendib Efreet deck that sucked so incredibly much.  As much as I hate to lose to that kind of garbage, at least it keeps smart people honest...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That damn furor deck is really no different than the ancient Unholy Strength/Unstable Mutation/Serendib Efreet deck that sucked so incredibly much.  As much as I hate to lose to that kind of garbage, at least it keeps smart people honest&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malk</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/standard-spike-rg-in-innistrad-block-constructed/comment-page-1/#comment-8564</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Malk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 23:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=16173#comment-8564</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Btw seeing that you&#039;re playing GR seems to be almost mandatory to have ancient grudge on the sideboard, the card is quite busted.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Btw seeing that you&#8217;re playing GR seems to be almost mandatory to have ancient grudge on the sideboard, the card is quite busted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/standard-spike-rg-in-innistrad-block-constructed/comment-page-1/#comment-8563</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[M]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 23:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=16173#comment-8563</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice deck, just an advie you&#039;re not making full use of your Huntmasters, when he&#039;s in play quite often the play is to just pass, and setup flip turns, for example last game aginst boros you played geist to fdeal an extra 2 damage, you could just pass flip and deal two damage to him anyway, then on your next turn go villager + geist to flip again]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice deck, just an advie you&#8217;re not making full use of your Huntmasters, when he&#8217;s in play quite often the play is to just pass, and setup flip turns, for example last game aginst boros you played geist to fdeal an extra 2 damage, you could just pass flip and deal two damage to him anyway, then on your next turn go villager + geist to flip again</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
