<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Standard Spike: UWb Control in Standard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/standard-spike-uwb-control-in-standard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/standard-spike-uwb-control-in-standard/</link>
	<description>The prime source for Magic the Gathering strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2017 22:21:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: apaulogy</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/standard-spike-uwb-control-in-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-7618</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[apaulogy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 16:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=15476#comment-7618</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am still having moderate success with it in 2-mans (which, I know,  is generally subpar opponents with bad decks, but I am still fighting Relics and whatnot). I am 23-9 with it there. All of me DE energy has been put into 4-0&#039;ing sealeds (3 so far) because I want to qualify for MOCS this month.

I also am not running ghast or smallpox. I have  3 Liliana + Bob + 1 Witness instead.

I have also been tinkering with BW Tokens.

I might run it is a DE this weekend. Hit me up on MODO if you want to test any new brews or whatev.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am still having moderate success with it in 2-mans (which, I know,  is generally subpar opponents with bad decks, but I am still fighting Relics and whatnot). I am 23-9 with it there. All of me DE energy has been put into 4-0&#8242;ing sealeds (3 so far) because I want to qualify for MOCS this month.</p>
<p>I also am not running ghast or smallpox. I have  3 Liliana + Bob + 1 Witness instead.</p>
<p>I have also been tinkering with BW Tokens.</p>
<p>I might run it is a DE this weekend. Hit me up on MODO if you want to test any new brews or whatev.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: _ShipItHolla</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/standard-spike-uwb-control-in-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-7607</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[_ShipItHolla]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 22:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=15476#comment-7607</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Mike I, Liliana would be an okay fit, but that would require moving much deeper into black which isn&#039;t exactly the direction I want to go. Also, Liliana is pretty lacking against the card Lingering Souls.

@apaulogy, Is the deck doing well for you? I got kinda scared that it would get hated out after it won a GP. It&#039;s pretty difficult to beat almost any form of gy hate (except Cage, as you can still work around it).

@Jawa, The second Snapcaster is boarded in against almost everything. I couldn&#039;t make room in the md for it, but postboard there&#039;s usually room and also usually more targets. It also serves as an additional answer to Geist of Saint Traft, a card that is responsible for a lot of the deck&#039;s losses.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mike I, Liliana would be an okay fit, but that would require moving much deeper into black which isn&#8217;t exactly the direction I want to go. Also, Liliana is pretty lacking against the card Lingering Souls.</p>
<p>@apaulogy, Is the deck doing well for you? I got kinda scared that it would get hated out after it won a GP. It&#8217;s pretty difficult to beat almost any form of gy hate (except Cage, as you can still work around it).</p>
<p>@Jawa, The second Snapcaster is boarded in against almost everything. I couldn&#8217;t make room in the md for it, but postboard there&#8217;s usually room and also usually more targets. It also serves as an additional answer to Geist of Saint Traft, a card that is responsible for a lot of the deck&#8217;s losses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jawa</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/standard-spike-uwb-control-in-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-7597</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jawa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 14:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=15476#comment-7597</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like the deck, tried it on last week&#039;s fnm and went 3-0-1.

What do you board in the second snapcaster against? 

Ain&#039;t the deck extremely weak against an surgical extraction of Sun Titan?

Keep up the good work :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the deck, tried it on last week&#8217;s fnm and went 3-0-1.</p>
<p>What do you board in the second snapcaster against? </p>
<p>Ain&#8217;t the deck extremely weak against an surgical extraction of Sun Titan?</p>
<p>Keep up the good work <img src="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" class="wp-smiley" /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/standard-spike-uwb-control-in-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-7593</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 19:52:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=15476#comment-7593</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alot of mouth breathing and throat noises.

Other wise, interesting brew.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alot of mouth breathing and throat noises.</p>
<p>Other wise, interesting brew.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: apaulogy</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/standard-spike-uwb-control-in-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-7588</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[apaulogy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 22:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=15476#comment-7588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[aww, man...I was hoping for another run with the loam deck. After our little scrimmage last week and you chiding me for playing a &quot;bad&quot; version of loam (no goyf), I went and got them. Was coming to see what you were doing to that list...

I despise standard, but I watched your videos anyway. I like this deck, but I don&#039;t have anything really thoughtful to add nor am I going to grind standard...

You are always fun to watch tho...keep postin&#039; em and I&#039;ll keep watchin&#039; em.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>aww, man&#8230;I was hoping for another run with the loam deck. After our little scrimmage last week and you chiding me for playing a &#8220;bad&#8221; version of loam (no goyf), I went and got them. Was coming to see what you were doing to that list&#8230;</p>
<p>I despise standard, but I watched your videos anyway. I like this deck, but I don&#8217;t have anything really thoughtful to add nor am I going to grind standard&#8230;</p>
<p>You are always fun to watch tho&#8230;keep postin&#8217; em and I&#8217;ll keep watchin&#8217; em.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bkwrds</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/standard-spike-uwb-control-in-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-7587</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bkwrds]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 22:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=15476#comment-7587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can&#039;t Revoke in response, it&#039;s a Sorcery.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t Revoke in response, it&#8217;s a Sorcery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sowikkid</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/standard-spike-uwb-control-in-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-7586</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sowikkid]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 22:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=15476#comment-7586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In round 1 g2, couldn&#039;t you have Revoked the O-ring in response to Surgical using the returning Sun Titan to get the image back and fizzle Surgical.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In round 1 g2, couldn&#8217;t you have Revoked the O-ring in response to Surgical using the returning Sun Titan to get the image back and fizzle Surgical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
