<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Testing 1, 2, 3: February Edition #2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/testing-1-2-3-february-edition-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/testing-1-2-3-february-edition-2/</link>
	<description>The prime source for Magic the Gathering strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2017 22:21:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhythmik</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/testing-1-2-3-february-edition-2/comment-page-1/#comment-633</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rhythmik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 00:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=5714#comment-633</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CJ, I was dead on board at that point.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CJ, I was dead on board at that point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhythmik</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/testing-1-2-3-february-edition-2/comment-page-1/#comment-632</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rhythmik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 00:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=5714#comment-632</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks everyone for all the replies.  Next week, I will be moving to 2-man Queues and Daily Events, since the deck quality is a bit better.

Anonymous, I have noticed that, when playing U/W, equipments can become a huge problem, so I like to deal with equipments whenever possible.  My opponent was having issues, and I felt the pace was slow enough to play draw-go until I could get rid of it.  With U/W control, I feel there is no real need to drop threats, unless your opponent gives you a reason to.  I like to play the deck in a pretty reactionary fashion.

While I may be okay playing with Combo and Control decks, I don&#039;t laud myself as the best player around, and I typically do better with Aggro.  This column is as much to help me become a better player as it is to help you guys become better.  I feel that strategies only form well when many minds are involved.  RoninX, thanks for your extensive feedback, and I may try your sideboard strategies next week.  Extensive preparation for the MOCS had spread my attention a bit thin (having to juggle four decks at one time), but I will be focusing on Zendikar Block Constructed heavily for this final week of Testing: One, Two, Three this month.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks everyone for all the replies.  Next week, I will be moving to 2-man Queues and Daily Events, since the deck quality is a bit better.</p>
<p>Anonymous, I have noticed that, when playing U/W, equipments can become a huge problem, so I like to deal with equipments whenever possible.  My opponent was having issues, and I felt the pace was slow enough to play draw-go until I could get rid of it.  With U/W control, I feel there is no real need to drop threats, unless your opponent gives you a reason to.  I like to play the deck in a pretty reactionary fashion.</p>
<p>While I may be okay playing with Combo and Control decks, I don&#8217;t laud myself as the best player around, and I typically do better with Aggro.  This column is as much to help me become a better player as it is to help you guys become better.  I feel that strategies only form well when many minds are involved.  RoninX, thanks for your extensive feedback, and I may try your sideboard strategies next week.  Extensive preparation for the MOCS had spread my attention a bit thin (having to juggle four decks at one time), but I will be focusing on Zendikar Block Constructed heavily for this final week of Testing: One, Two, Three this month.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cj</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/testing-1-2-3-february-edition-2/comment-page-1/#comment-631</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cj]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 00:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=5714#comment-631</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[you had a 2nd rite gm1 vs armory why not use it to start eating his board instead u concede although the island pierce pierce draw would have made that a moot point]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you had a 2nd rite gm1 vs armory why not use it to start eating his board instead u concede although the island pierce pierce draw would have made that a moot point</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whatisfgh</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/testing-1-2-3-february-edition-2/comment-page-1/#comment-629</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[whatisfgh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 19:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=5714#comment-629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Game 1 of valakut.  I think maybe you just hadn&#039;t realized how big your geopede was going to be the next turn.  If you had, would you suggest that not cracking your fetchland in order to give geopede protection from burst lightning might be the better play that turn you play the map?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Game 1 of valakut.  I think maybe you just hadn&#8217;t realized how big your geopede was going to be the next turn.  If you had, would you suggest that not cracking your fetchland in order to give geopede protection from burst lightning might be the better play that turn you play the map?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/testing-1-2-3-february-edition-2/comment-page-1/#comment-624</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 12:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=5714#comment-624</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Game two I saw two play mistakes when you were playing with UW Control. In game 2, you waited a turn to play Kor Sanctifiers and blow of up 1 of his two adventuring gear. Even if he draws explorer&#039;s scope, he still doesn&#039;t have a creature on board yet and he&#039;s stuck on a single land and you have into the roil. Why did you wait a turn? Then on a subsequent turn you drew Serije Refuge and played a plains instead, and you tapped you blue not leaving up spell pierce and you played a plains so you didn&#039;t have UU until two turns after.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Game two I saw two play mistakes when you were playing with UW Control. In game 2, you waited a turn to play Kor Sanctifiers and blow of up 1 of his two adventuring gear. Even if he draws explorer&#8217;s scope, he still doesn&#8217;t have a creature on board yet and he&#8217;s stuck on a single land and you have into the roil. Why did you wait a turn? Then on a subsequent turn you drew Serije Refuge and played a plains instead, and you tapped you blue not leaving up spell pierce and you played a plains so you didn&#8217;t have UU until two turns after.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RoninX</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/testing-1-2-3-february-edition-2/comment-page-1/#comment-621</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RoninX]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 00:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=5714#comment-621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ Lunco - he had Brave the Elements in hand... but died with it unused :(]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Lunco &#8211; he had Brave the Elements in hand&#8230; but died with it unused <img src="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif" alt=":(" class="wp-smiley" /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lunco</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/testing-1-2-3-february-edition-2/comment-page-1/#comment-620</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lunco]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 23:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=5714#comment-620</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In game 1 with Kor Armory you could have played the Master and equipped him with the Gear to get 2 extra dmg from Skyfisher. Was there a particular reason like saving that 1 mana for the next turn or something else?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In game 1 with Kor Armory you could have played the Master and equipped him with the Gear to get 2 extra dmg from Skyfisher. Was there a particular reason like saving that 1 mana for the next turn or something else?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
