<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PlanetWalls and the Kool Kat: NMS Draft #2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/the-stupidly-named-limited-series-nms-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/the-stupidly-named-limited-series-nms-2/</link>
	<description>The prime source for Magic the Gathering strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2017 22:21:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inigo</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/the-stupidly-named-limited-series-nms-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5335</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Inigo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 12:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=13043#comment-5335</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would have taken the liquimetal coating. you had 6 pieces of artifact removal, and turns on a rhino if you want to play it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have taken the liquimetal coating. you had 6 pieces of artifact removal, and turns on a rhino if you want to play it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PlanetWalls</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/the-stupidly-named-limited-series-nms-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5282</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PlanetWalls]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 22:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=13043#comment-5282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RE: Milegy -- I&#039;m curious if you have your sound on when watching the Drafts.  It&#039;s perfectly fine if you prefer them without hearing our voices (I&#039;d completely understand, in fact!), but I think we addressed a couple of those issues in game, at the points you were speaking of.  We definitely made an error in Round 1 by not playing our Gremlin Mine when we had a chance, and then our opponent was able to equip his artifact creature twice, netting him 6 life from two Lifestaffs (though we talked about that error as soon as we made it).  But also holding back a Gremlin Mine in some circumstances opens up your opponent to make an error, for instance, if he wants to cast a valuable low-toughness artifact creature spell before casting the lower-value one.  As for the Burn the Impure on the Phyrexian Hydra, while I haven&#039;t watched the video right before writing this response, I believe we did so in order to make sure he committed to an attack with the Hydra before losing the 3 life from Burning his Impure Hydra (and said as much in the video, I hope, but perhaps I&#039;m wrong).  Basically, we didn&#039;t want him to have all the information before declaring attacks -- he may not have known, in short, that he&#039;d be losing 3 more life.

RE: MightyMosy -- Thanks for the compliment about the video.  Glad you liked it.  We should be posting another one a week from today (every other Friday, according to our current calendar).

In retrospect, Tanadon would&#039;ve been better for our deck, but (1) I&#039;m not sure it&#039;s *always* playable in a deck, and (2) at the time, we probably both imagined playing a more controlling, less Cat-heavy strategy.  Plus the Talisman could&#039;ve ramped up to the green Exarch.  Nonetheless, your point is well-taken.

About Spin Engine, I&#039;m pretty sure that card just plain sucks now in most matchups, but that could be too strong of a statement.  It&#039;s just that it dies to every removal spell in the format, and now that New Phyrexia joined the party, there are fewer playable artifacts to absorb the artifact removal and keep Spin Engine safe.  All that said, I think that Spin Engine would be awesome in a deck with Concussive Bolt, and it&#039;s my lifelong dream to keep drafting decks with Concussive Bolt.  And it works, like you said, in the same way Insatiable Souleater did in the Infect matchup, versus Cystbearer.  But Ringleader blocks once for value, and it would&#039;ve been good with cat tokens.  I think the 4 toughness makes him pretty resilient in the format, but I haven&#039;t tested him a lot either.

Thanks, everyone, for the comments.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE: Milegy &#8212; I&#8217;m curious if you have your sound on when watching the Drafts.  It&#8217;s perfectly fine if you prefer them without hearing our voices (I&#8217;d completely understand, in fact!), but I think we addressed a couple of those issues in game, at the points you were speaking of.  We definitely made an error in Round 1 by not playing our Gremlin Mine when we had a chance, and then our opponent was able to equip his artifact creature twice, netting him 6 life from two Lifestaffs (though we talked about that error as soon as we made it).  But also holding back a Gremlin Mine in some circumstances opens up your opponent to make an error, for instance, if he wants to cast a valuable low-toughness artifact creature spell before casting the lower-value one.  As for the Burn the Impure on the Phyrexian Hydra, while I haven&#8217;t watched the video right before writing this response, I believe we did so in order to make sure he committed to an attack with the Hydra before losing the 3 life from Burning his Impure Hydra (and said as much in the video, I hope, but perhaps I&#8217;m wrong).  Basically, we didn&#8217;t want him to have all the information before declaring attacks &#8212; he may not have known, in short, that he&#8217;d be losing 3 more life.</p>
<p>RE: MightyMosy &#8212; Thanks for the compliment about the video.  Glad you liked it.  We should be posting another one a week from today (every other Friday, according to our current calendar).</p>
<p>In retrospect, Tanadon would&#8217;ve been better for our deck, but (1) I&#8217;m not sure it&#8217;s *always* playable in a deck, and (2) at the time, we probably both imagined playing a more controlling, less Cat-heavy strategy.  Plus the Talisman could&#8217;ve ramped up to the green Exarch.  Nonetheless, your point is well-taken.</p>
<p>About Spin Engine, I&#8217;m pretty sure that card just plain sucks now in most matchups, but that could be too strong of a statement.  It&#8217;s just that it dies to every removal spell in the format, and now that New Phyrexia joined the party, there are fewer playable artifacts to absorb the artifact removal and keep Spin Engine safe.  All that said, I think that Spin Engine would be awesome in a deck with Concussive Bolt, and it&#8217;s my lifelong dream to keep drafting decks with Concussive Bolt.  And it works, like you said, in the same way Insatiable Souleater did in the Infect matchup, versus Cystbearer.  But Ringleader blocks once for value, and it would&#8217;ve been good with cat tokens.  I think the 4 toughness makes him pretty resilient in the format, but I haven&#8217;t tested him a lot either.</p>
<p>Thanks, everyone, for the comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mightymosy83</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/the-stupidly-named-limited-series-nms-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5264</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mightymosy83]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 18:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=13043#comment-5264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Regarding your picks:
Thanadon: I think the Thanadon is better than Talisman, especially since you already had the green Exarch.
The Talisman can save you in long games, but Thanadon will almost always be good, and sometimes exceptionally. 
Thanadon you will always play, and it will always be a strong addition to your creature base. Look at the creature count misery you had in the end of the draft. Picking quality creatures that fit into any deck deck early instead of random mana acceleration is a good step into avoiding such situations.
The Talisman is good, but Thanadon applies pressure!

Spin Engine: I like your decision. Being 2 mana cheaper is almost enough reason. Than consider that Ringleader sucks on defense, and you have it. Sure, Spin Engine often gets killed by Pith Driller or Blisterstick or Virulent Wound, but what are you gonna do? Not play 1-toughness dudes? You already had some of those, so you basically can&#039;t avoid it. Clogging up the 5-drops just to prevent 1-toughness-removals from getting you won&#039;t work if in the meantime you just get overrun by a deck with a real curve. Again, Ringleader sucks at blocking. Spin Engine can take down a Cystbearer.
If you get an aggressive start and they don&#039;t have the precious 1-toughness-removal, Spin Engine can be the nail in the coffin.
So, I really like that pick!

Couriers: I don&#039;t get why people hate them. I usually play them maindeck, when they are in my main color, unless I have plenty of other good options. I usually hope to leave them in the sideboard when they are in my secondary color.

Scoria Elemental / Insatiable Souleater: None of the are good. But they are certainly playable! I would have maindecked the Souleater if I were you. Certainly over something like Corpse Cur in a non-infect deck :-)
In Triple SOM I once had a deck with Bladed Pinions and Accorder Shields. I ran Scoria Elemental and it was awesome! It is a fragile strategy, and certainly not tier 1, but especially when drafts go somewhat poor like the one you had, they become a very viable Plan B strategy, I think!

Casutic Hound / Seize the Initiative: I think the same as you, but never have seen it happen.

Rally the forces, maybe Blunt the Assault : I&#039;d advice against it. The latter is an awesome fog variant for multiplayer, though :-)))


All in all, this was certainly one of the better, and easily the most entertaining draft video i have watched in recent weeks! Kepp it up, guys!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding your picks:<br />
Thanadon: I think the Thanadon is better than Talisman, especially since you already had the green Exarch.<br />
The Talisman can save you in long games, but Thanadon will almost always be good, and sometimes exceptionally.<br />
Thanadon you will always play, and it will always be a strong addition to your creature base. Look at the creature count misery you had in the end of the draft. Picking quality creatures that fit into any deck deck early instead of random mana acceleration is a good step into avoiding such situations.<br />
The Talisman is good, but Thanadon applies pressure!</p>
<p>Spin Engine: I like your decision. Being 2 mana cheaper is almost enough reason. Than consider that Ringleader sucks on defense, and you have it. Sure, Spin Engine often gets killed by Pith Driller or Blisterstick or Virulent Wound, but what are you gonna do? Not play 1-toughness dudes? You already had some of those, so you basically can&#8217;t avoid it. Clogging up the 5-drops just to prevent 1-toughness-removals from getting you won&#8217;t work if in the meantime you just get overrun by a deck with a real curve. Again, Ringleader sucks at blocking. Spin Engine can take down a Cystbearer.<br />
If you get an aggressive start and they don&#8217;t have the precious 1-toughness-removal, Spin Engine can be the nail in the coffin.<br />
So, I really like that pick!</p>
<p>Couriers: I don&#8217;t get why people hate them. I usually play them maindeck, when they are in my main color, unless I have plenty of other good options. I usually hope to leave them in the sideboard when they are in my secondary color.</p>
<p>Scoria Elemental / Insatiable Souleater: None of the are good. But they are certainly playable! I would have maindecked the Souleater if I were you. Certainly over something like Corpse Cur in a non-infect deck <img src="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":-)" class="wp-smiley" /><br />
In Triple SOM I once had a deck with Bladed Pinions and Accorder Shields. I ran Scoria Elemental and it was awesome! It is a fragile strategy, and certainly not tier 1, but especially when drafts go somewhat poor like the one you had, they become a very viable Plan B strategy, I think!</p>
<p>Casutic Hound / Seize the Initiative: I think the same as you, but never have seen it happen.</p>
<p>Rally the forces, maybe Blunt the Assault : I&#8217;d advice against it. The latter is an awesome fog variant for multiplayer, though :-)))</p>
<p>All in all, this was certainly one of the better, and easily the most entertaining draft video i have watched in recent weeks! Kepp it up, guys!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: milegyenanevem</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/the-stupidly-named-limited-series-nms-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5260</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[milegyenanevem]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 15:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=13043#comment-5260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The very last, mostly. Although this conservative timing is quite usual. I mean, usually it is a good thing to use your removal in the very last moment. But in case you know you want to kill that particular guy, but he can save it with a pump spell, it worth to try in your turn, as it means he will waste his pump spell. And it is much clearer in case of the Phyrexian Hydra, of course.

Another thing I wanted to mention is Gremlin Mine. If it is in your hand, play it! You lose the surprise element, your opponent can play a smaller threat at first. But in case of your deck, it&#039;s not a big problem, as you have plenty of artifact removal. You kill the small guy with it, he plays the bigger guy, and then you still have a removal. Or he can destroy it, before playing his artifact, but then you should be happy again, as your opponent lost a removal spell. On the other hand, if it&#039;s on the battlefield, you can use it with instant speed and you save a mana in a later turn, when it might be important.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The very last, mostly. Although this conservative timing is quite usual. I mean, usually it is a good thing to use your removal in the very last moment. But in case you know you want to kill that particular guy, but he can save it with a pump spell, it worth to try in your turn, as it means he will waste his pump spell. And it is much clearer in case of the Phyrexian Hydra, of course.</p>
<p>Another thing I wanted to mention is Gremlin Mine. If it is in your hand, play it! You lose the surprise element, your opponent can play a smaller threat at first. But in case of your deck, it&#8217;s not a big problem, as you have plenty of artifact removal. You kill the small guy with it, he plays the bigger guy, and then you still have a removal. Or he can destroy it, before playing his artifact, but then you should be happy again, as your opponent lost a removal spell. On the other hand, if it&#8217;s on the battlefield, you can use it with instant speed and you save a mana in a later turn, when it might be important.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PlanetWalls</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/the-stupidly-named-limited-series-nms-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5257</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PlanetWalls]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 02:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=13043#comment-5257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Which match are you talking about?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which match are you talking about?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: milegyenanevem</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/the-stupidly-named-limited-series-nms-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5253</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[milegyenanevem]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 22:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=13043#comment-5253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Please, use instant speed removal sometimes in your turn! If your opponent had an Untamed Might in the last game, you would have lost. Also, it is an unnecessary risk to use Leonin Relic-Warder instead of Revoke Existence. If he can kill it, he gets back his artifact, and you really didn&#039;t need a 6th guy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please, use instant speed removal sometimes in your turn! If your opponent had an Untamed Might in the last game, you would have lost. Also, it is an unnecessary risk to use Leonin Relic-Warder instead of Revoke Existence. If he can kill it, he gets back his artifact, and you really didn&#8217;t need a 6th guy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oma</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/the-stupidly-named-limited-series-nms-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5241</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[oma]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 16:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=13043#comment-5241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, hat in hand.  Well played gentlemen! WSZ is sick.

I can&#039;t wait for m12 on modo.  I&#039;ve been over nms for a month now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, hat in hand.  Well played gentlemen! WSZ is sick.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t wait for m12 on modo.  I&#8217;ve been over nms for a month now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
